The aim of this study was to address chronic heart failure (HF) diagnosis with the application of machine learning (ML) approaches. In the present study, we simulated the procedure that is followed in clinical practice, as the models we built are based on various combinations of feature categories, e.g., clinical features, echocardiogram, and laboratory findings. We also investigated the incremental value of each feature type. The total number of subjects utilized was 422. An ML approach is proposed, comprising of feature selection, handling class imbalance, and classification steps. The results for HF diagnosis were quite satisfactory with a high accuracy (91.23%), sensitivity (93.83%), and specificity (89.62%) when features from all categories were utilized. The results remained quite high, even in cases where single feature types were employed.

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review on the potential value of saliva biomarkers in the diagnosis, management and prognosis of heart failure (HF). The correlation between saliva and plasma values of these biomarkers was also studied. PubMed was searched to collect relevant literature, i.e., case-control, cross-sectional studies that either compared the values of salivary biomarkers among healthy subjects and HF patients, or investigated their role in risk stratification and prognosis in HF patients. No randomized control trials were included. The search ended on 31st of December 2020. A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. 18 salivary biomarkers were analyzed and the levels of all biomarkers studied were found to be higher in HF patients compared to controls, except for amylase, sodium, and chloride that had smaller saliva concentrations in HF patients. Natriuretic peptides are the most commonly used plasma biomarkers in the management of HF. Their saliva levels show promising results, although the correlation of saliva to plasma values is weakened in higher plasma values. In most of the publications, differences in biomarker levels between HF patients and controls were found to be statistically significant. Due to the small number of patients included, larger studies need to be conducted in order to facilitate the use of saliva biomarkers in clinical practice.

Summary: Background: Heart failure (HF) is affecting millions of people every year and it is characterized by impaired ventricular performance, exercise intolerance and shortened life expectancy. Despite significant advancements in drug therapy, mortality of the disease remains excessively high, as heart transplant remains the gold standard treatment for end-stage HF when no contraindications subsist. Traditionally, implanted Ventricular Assist Devices (VADs) have been employed in order to provide circulatory support to patients who cannot survive the waiting time to transplantation, reducing the workload imposed on the heart. In many cases that process could recover its contractility performance.Objectives: The SensorART platform focuses on the management and remote treatment of patients suffering from HF. It provides an inter-operable, extendable and VAD-independent solution, which incorporates various hardware and software components in a holistic approach, in order to improve the quality of the patients’ treatment and the workflow of the specialists. This paper focuses on the description and analysis of Specialist’s Decision Support System (SDSS), an innovative component of the SensorART platform.Methods: The SDSS is a Web-based tool that assists specialists on designing the therapy plan for their patients before and after VAD implantation, analyzing patients’ data, extracting new knowledge, and making informative decisions.Results: SDSS offers support to medical and VAD experts through the different phases of VAD therapy, incorporating several tools covering all related fields; Statistics, Association Rules, Monitoring, Treatment, Weaning, Speed and Suction Detection.Conclusions: SDSS and its modules have been tested in a number of patients and the results are encouraging.

Background/Objectives: The prevalence of breast cancer (BC) is significant globally. The malignancy itself and the related treatments have a considerable impact on patients’ overall well-being. The adoption of e-health solutions for patients is increasing rapidly worldwide, since these innovative tools hold significant potential to positively impact the mental health and quality of life (QoL) of BC patients. However, their overall impact is still being explored, and further understanding and analysis are required. This review paper aims to present, quantify, and summarize the cumulative available randomized evidence on the state of the art of supportive interventions delivered via e-health applications for patients’ mental health and QoL before, during, and after BC treatment. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines in the Scopus and PubMed databases on 7 November 2024 to identify studies that utilized internet-based interventions in BC patients. The inclusion criteria were as follows: adult men and women (aged > 18 years) diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) who received patient-directed e-health interventions, compared to standard care or control interventions. The studies had to focus on outcomes such as quality of life (QoL), anxiety, depression, and distress, and be limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The PRISMA-P guidelines were followed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool for randomized controlled trials. Results: A total of 27 randomized studies, involving 2898 patients, were included in this systematic review. The e-health interventions significantly affected patients’ anxiety (SMD = −0.80; 95% CI: −1.33 to −0.27; p < 0.01; and I² = 94%), depression (SMD = −0.74; 95% CI: −1.40 to −0.09; p = 0.026; and I² = 95%) and QoL (SMD = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.04; p < 0.01; and I² = 90%) but had no significant effect on distress (SMD = −0.78; 95% CI: −1.93 to 0.37; p = 0.184; and I² = 95%). Conclusions: This study showed that e-health interventions can improve QoL, reduce anxiety, and decrease depression in adult BC patients. However, no noticeable impact on reducing distress levels was observed. Additionally, given the diversity of interventions, these results should be interpreted with caution. To determine the optimum duration, validate different intervention approaches, and address methodological gaps in previous studies, more extensive clinical studies are needed.