This study aimed to assess the mechanical and biocompatibility properties of dental resin reinforced with different nanoparticle additives. Temporary crown specimens were 3D-printed and grouped based on nanoparticle type and amount, including zirconia and glass silica. Flexural strength testing evaluated the material’s ability to withstand mechanical stress using a three-point bending test. Biocompatibility was tested using MTT and dead/live cell assays to assess effects on cell viability and tissue integration. Fractured specimens were analysed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) for fracture surface examination and elemental composition determination. Results show that adding 5% glass fillers and 10–20% zirconia nanoparticles significantly improves the flexural strength and biocompatibility of the resin material. Specifically, the addition of 10%, 20% zirconia, and 5% glass silica by weight significantly increases the flexural strength of the 3D-printed resins. Biocompatibility testing reveals cell viabilities greater than 80% in all tested groups. Reinforced 3D-printed resin holds clinical potential for restorative dentistry, as zirconia and glass fillers have been shown to enhance mechanical and biocompatibility properties of dental resin, making it a promising option for dental restorations. The findings of this study may contribute to the development of more effective and durable dental materials.

We earlier reported that cell-projection pumping transfers fibroblast contents to cancer cells and this alters the cancer cell phenotype. Here, we report on single-cell tracking of time lapse recordings from co-cultured fluorescent fibroblasts and SAOS-2 osteosarcoma cells, tracking 5201 cells across 7 experiments. The fluorescent lipophilic marker DiD was used to label fibroblast organelles and to trace the transfer of fibroblast cytoplasm into SAOS-2 cells. We related SAOS-2 phenotypic change to levels of fluorescence transfer from fibroblasts to SAOS-2 cells, as well as what we term ‘compensated fluorescence’, that numerically projects mother cell fluorescence post-mitosis into daughter cells. The comparison of absolute with compensated fluorescence allowed us to deduct if the phenotypic effects in mother SAOS-2 cells were inherited by their daughters. SAOS-2 receipt of fibroblast fluorescence correlated by Kendall’s tau with cell-profile area and without evidence of persistence in daughter cells (median tau = 0.51, p < 0.016); negatively and weakly with cell circularity and with evidence of persistence (median tau = −0.19, p < 0.05); and very weakly with cell migration velocity and without evidence of persistence (median tau = 0.01, p < 0.016). In addition, mitotic SAOS-2 cells had higher rates of prior fluorescence uptake (median = 64.9 units/day) than non-dividing cells (median = 35.6 units/day, p < 0.016) and there was no evidence of persistence post-mitosis. We conclude that there was an appreciable impact of cell-projection pumping on cancer cell phenotype relevant to cancer histopathological diagnosis, clinical spread and growth, with most effects being ‘reset’ by cancer cell mitosis.

We recently described cell-projection pumping as a mechanism transferring cytoplasm between cells. The uptake of fibroblast cytoplasm by co-cultured SAOS-2 osteosarcoma cells changes SAOS-2 morphology and increases cell migration and proliferation, as seen by single-cell tracking and in FACS separated SAOS-2 from co-cultures. Morphological changes in SAOS-2 seen by single cell tracking are consistent with previous observations in fixed monolayers of SAOS-2 co-cultures. Notably, earlier studies with fixed co-cultures were limited by the absence of a quantitative method for identifying sub-populations of co-cultured cells, or for quantitating transfer relative to control populations of SAOS-2 or fibroblasts cultured alone. We now overcome that limitation by a novel Cartesian plot analysis that identifies individual co-cultured cells as belonging to one of five distinct cell populations, and also gives numerical measure of similarity to control cell populations. We verified the utility of the method by first confirming the previously established relationship between SAOS-2 morphology and uptake of fibroblast contents, and also demonstrated similar effects in other cancer cell lines including from melanomas, and cancers of the ovary and colon. The method was extended to examine global DNA methylation, and while there was no clear effect on SAOS-2 DNA methylation, co-cultured fibroblasts had greatly reduced DNA methylation, similar to cancer associated fibroblasts.