Leaf area index (LAI) estimation based on remote sensing data has often relied on the use of spectral vegetation indices from optical data. However, it is difficult to accurately estimate LAI due to saturation of spectral signals. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems have emerged as promising technologies for overcoming the saturation problem, and an increasing number of studies have been conducted on LAI estimation using LiDAR data. In this study, we compared the performance of LAI estimation using LiDAR height and intensity data, and explored the potential for estimating forest LAI using combined LiDAR height and intensity data. LAI estimation models were established using LiDAR height, intensity, and a combination of LiDAR height and intensity metrics based on a random forest regression algorithm. Our results show that the laser intercept index derived from LiDAR height or intensity data was the most important predictor for LAI. Field measurements of LAI at 64 sites were used to assess the power of various LiDAR metrics in predicting LAI. The results show that both LiDAR height and intensity metrics alone could reliably estimate forest LAI. However, compared to LiDAR intensity metrics [ $R^{{\rm 2}}\,= \,0.610$ with root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.664], LiDAR height metrics had a better predictive power ( $R^{{\rm 2}}\,= \,0.765$ with RMSE of 0.562). Moreover, the combined LiDAR height and intensity metrics resulted in the highest LAI estimation accuracy ( $R^{{\rm 2}}\,= \,0.809$ with RMSE of 0.501). Therefore, the combination of LiDAR height and intensity data has a great potential for improving the LAI estimation accuracy.

Accurate estimation of aboveground carbon stock for individual trees is important for evaluating forest carbon sequestration potential and maintaining ecosystem carbon balance. Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data has been widely used to estimate tree-level carbon stock. However, few studies have explored the potential of combining LiDAR and hyperspectral data to estimate tree-level carbon stock. The objective of this study is to explore the potential of integrating unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) LiDAR with hyperspectral data for tree-level aboveground carbon stock estimation. To achieve this goal, we first delineated individual trees by a CHM-based watershed segmentation algorithm. We then extracted structural and spectral features from UAV LiDAR and hyperspectral data respectively. Then, Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to assess the correlation between LiDAR features, hyperspectral features, and tree-level carbon stock, based on which, features were selected for model development. Finally, we developed tree-level carbon stock estimation models based on the Schumacher–Hall formula and stepwise multiple regression. Results showed that both LiDAR and hyperspectral features were strongly correlated to tree-level carbon stock. Both tree height (H, r = 0.75) and Green index (GI, r = 0.83) had the highest correlation coefficients with tree-level carbon stock in LiDAR and hyperspectral features, respectively. The best model using LiDAR features alone includes the metrics of H, the 10th height percentile of points (PH10), and mean height of points (H_mean), and can explain 74% of the variations in tree-level carbon stock. Similarly, the best model using hyperspectral data includes GI and modified normalized differential vegetation index (mNDVI), and has similar explanatory power (r² = 0.75). The model that integrates predictors, namely, GI and the 95th height percentile of points (PH95) from hyperspectral and LiDAR data, substantially improves the explanatory power (r² = 0.89). These results indicated that while either LiDAR data or hyperspectral data alone can estimate tree-level carbon stock with reasonable accuracy, combining LiDAR and hyperspectral features can substantially improve the explanatory power of the model. Such results suggested that tree-level carbon stock estimation can greatly benefit from the complementary nature of LiDAR-detected structural characteristics and hyperspectral-captured spectral information of vegetation.

Accurate estimation of the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR) for maize canopies are important for maize growth monitoring and yield estimation. The goal of this study is to explore the potential of using airborne LiDAR and hyperspectral data to better estimate maize fPAR. This study focuses on estimating maize fPAR from (1) height and coverage metrics derived from airborne LiDAR point cloud data; (2) vegetation indices derived from hyperspectral imagery; and (3) a combination of these metrics. Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationships among LiDAR metrics, hyperspectral metrics, and field-measured fPAR values. Then, multiple linear regression (MLR) models were developed using these metrics. Results showed that (1) LiDAR height and coverage metrics provided good explanatory power (i.e., R² = 0.81); (2) hyperspectral vegetation indices provided moderate interpretability (i.e., R² = 0.50); and (3) the combination of LiDAR metrics and hyperspectral metrics improved the LiDAR model (i.e., R² = 0.88). These results indicate that LiDAR model seems to offer a reliable method for estimating maize fPAR at a high spatial resolution and it can be used for farmland management. Combining LiDAR and hyperspectral metrics led to better performance of maize fPAR estimation than LiDAR or hyperspectral metrics alone, which means that maize fPAR retrieval can benefit from the complementary nature of LiDAR-detected canopy structure characteristics and hyperspectral-captured vegetation spectral information.

Foliage profile is a key biophysical parameter for forests. Airborne Light Detection and Ranging is an effective tool for vegetation parameter retrieval. Data acquisition conditions influence the estimation of biophysical parameters. To acquire accurate foliage profiles at the lowest cost, we used simulations to explore the effects of data acquisition conditions on forest foliage profile retrieval. First, a 3-D forest scene and the airborne small-footprint full-waveform LiDAR data were simulated by the DART model. Second, the foliage profile was estimated from LiDAR data based on a Geometric Optical and Radiative Transfer model. Lastly, the effects of the airborne LiDAR scanning angle, flying altitude, and pulse density on foliage profile retrieval were explored. The results indicated that the scanning angle was an important factor in the foliage profile retrieval, and the optimal scanning angle was 20°. The optimal scanning angle was independent of flying altitude and pulse density, and combinations of multiple scanning angles could improve the accuracy of the foliage profile estimation. The flying altitude and pulse density had little influence on foliage profile retrieval at plot level and could be ignored. In general, our study provides reliable information for selecting the optimal instrument operational parameters to acquire more accurate foliage profiles and minimize data acquisition costs.

An accurate spatial distribution map of the urban dominant tree species is crucial for evaluating the ecosystem service value of urban forests and formulating urban sustainable development strategies. Spaceborne hyperspectral remote sensing has been utilized to distinguish tree species, but these hyperspectral data have a low spatial resolution (pixel size ≥ 30 m), which limits their ability to differentiate tree species in urban areas characterized by fragmented patches and robust spatial heterogeneity. Zhuhai-1 is a new hyperspectral satellite sensor with a higher spatial resolution of 10 m. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of Zhuhai-1 hyperspectral imagery for classifying the urban dominant tree species. We first extracted 32 reflectance bands and 18 vegetation indices from Zhuhai-1 hyperspectral data. We then used the random forest classifier to differentiate 28 dominant tree species in Shenzhen based on these hyperspectral features. Finally, we analyzed the effects of the classification paradigm, classifier, and species number on the classification accuracy. We found that combining the hyperspectral reflectance bands and vegetation indices could effectively distinguish the 28 dominant tree species in Shenzhen, obtaining an overall accuracy of 76.8%. Sensitivity analysis results indicated that the pixel-based classification paradigm was slightly superior to the object-based paradigm. The random forest classifier proved to be the optimal classifier for distinguishing tree species using Zhuhai-1 hyperspectral imagery. Moreover, reducing the species number could slowly improve the classification accuracy. These findings suggest that Zhuhai-1 hyperspectral data can identify the urban dominant tree species with accuracy and holds potential for application in other cities.

Figuring out the effect of the built-up environment on artificial light at night is essential for better understanding nighttime luminosity in both socioeconomic and ecological perspectives. However, there are few studies linking artificial surface properties to nighttime light (NTL). This study uses a statistical method to investigate effects of construction region environments on nighttime brightness and its variation with building height and regional economic development level. First, we extracted footprint-level target heights from Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) waveform light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data. Then, we proposed a set of built-up environment properties, including building coverage, vegetation fraction, building height, and surface-area index, and then extracted these properties from GLAS-derived height, GlobeLand30 land-cover data, and DMSP/OLS radiance-calibrated NTL data. Next, the effects of non-building areas on NTL data were removed based on a supervised method. Finally, linear regression analyses were conducted to analyze the relationships between nighttime lights and built-up environment properties. Results showed that building coverage and vegetation fraction have weak correlations with nighttime lights (R² < 0.2), building height has a moderate correlation with nighttime lights (R² = 0.48), and surface-area index has a significant correlation with nighttime lights (R² = 0.64). The results suggest that surface-area index is a more reasonable measure for estimating light number and intensity of NTL because it takes into account both building coverage and height, i.e., building surface area. Meanwhile, building height contributed to nighttime lights greater than building coverage. Further analysis showed the correlation between NTL and surface-area index becomes stronger with the increase of building height, while it is the weakest when the regional economic development level is the highest. In conclusion, these results can help us better understand the determinants of nighttime lights.