Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae is an established animal pathogen while the zoonotic infections in humans are rarely reported. Infections occur after exposure to animals or animal products that are mostly occupational in adults. Here we report in a child for the first time septic arthritis and osteomyelitis without an identifiable risk factor. A 5-year-old male child was admitted with pain in the left hip joint and inability to bear weight on the limb. Clinical examination followed by radiological and magnetic resonance imaging was suggestive of septic arthritis. Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae grew from peroperative joint specimen. The infection was resolved following arthrotomy, joint lavage and antibiotic therapy.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is routinely performed for pain relief and to improve performance of the knee in individuals with severe knee osteoarthritis (OA). The quadriceps angle (Q-angle) is a key component of knee joint stability. However, there is a dearth of literature evaluating Q-angle as an outcome measure after TKA in individuals with severe knee OA. The objective of the study was to assess the Q-angle as an outcome measure before and after TKA and to find the correlation of Q-angle with pain, quadriceps strength, and knee flexion range of motion (ROM) after TKA in individuals with severe knee OA. The Q-angles of 34 individuals (male: female = 17:17) were measured using standardized procedures. Pain, quadriceps strength, and knee flexion ROM were measured. The measurements were taken preoperatively (one day before surgery), and postoperatively at the sixth week and third month after TKA. The mean Q-angle was 19.17° (SD = 1.92°) before TKA, 16.06° (SD = 1.87°) at the sixth week and 13.43° (SD = 1.77°) at the third month after TKA. Significant linear correlations were noted between the Q-angle and pain, quadriceps strength, and knee flexion ROM following TKA. The Q-angle was measured before and after TKA using a standardized clinical goniometric method. Understanding the Q-angle before and after TKA and its relationship with various clinical and functional variables is imperative in clinical practice for orthopedic surgeons and rehabilitation professionals.
Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is the current standard care of treatment for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Modified transtibial (mTT) and anteromedial portal (AMP) techniques aim at the anatomical placement of femoral tunnel. Controversy existed in the literature with regard to the outcome of these techniques. Hence, we designed a retrospective comparative study to analyse the clinical and functional outcomes of mTT and AMP techniques. We hypothesized that there would be no difference between the clinical and functional outcomes in mTT and AMP techniques. This retrospective observational study was conducted in consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using semitendinosus-gracilis (STG) quadrupled graft in our tertiary care centre with a minimum follow-up of two years. Out of 69 patients, 37 had undergone ACL reconstruction by mTT technique and remaining by AMP technique. All the patients were assessed clinically by anterior drawer, Lachman’s, pivot shift and single-legged hop test. Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation score were used for the functional status. Knee instability was assessed objectively by KT-1000 arthrometer. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline demographic characteristics between mTT and AMP groups. At the end of 2 years, no statistically significant difference was noted in the anterior drawer and Lachman’s test. Though not significant, IKDC scores and Lysholm’s scores showed a better outcome in the AMP group when compared to the mTT group. AMP group showed significantly better outcome with KT-1000 arthrometer. Based on the results obtained, we presume that overall both mTT and AMP have similar functional outcome. However, as AMP technique offers significantly improved subjective rotational stability on pivot shift test, better hop limb symmetry index and KT 1000 readings compared to mTT, we suggest AMP over mTT.