George BM, et al. Anat Cell Biol. 2014 Dec;47(4):253-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.5115/acb.2014.47.4.253

To systematically review, summarize and appraise evidence on the factors determining quality of life (QoL) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. We searched six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, and ProQuest) using appropriate search terms to identify the relevant literature published on the factors determining QoL following TKA. Two reviewers independently performed the study screening and study selection. A third reviewer was consulted in case of any disagreement. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Modified Downs and Black Index checklist. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022352887) and reported according to the PRISMA checklist. We identified a total of 8517 studies, 29 of which were included. Advanced age; female sex; increased body mass index (BMI); the presence of comorbidities such as diabetes; contralateral knee pain; poor preoperative status; psychological and pain-related factors such as the presence of pain catastrophizing; central sensitization; kinesiophobia; anxiety; depression; chronic pain; psychological distress; low level of optimism; and reduced patient satisfaction were used to determine post-TKA QoL scores. High BMI and depression were the most common factors evaluated in these studies. Overall, the methodological quality of the included studies varied from high to low. After TKA, the overall QoL score improved. However, there are a few physical, behavioral, and psychological factors that influence QoL. Identifying these factors could aid clinicians and health professionals in treating and rehabilitating patients by helping them improve patient prognosis after TKA.

The conventional lateral approach to the orbit (Krönlein) does not allow a satisfactory view of the superior part of the orbit and the operative field is rather narrow. Therefore, large tumors which have developed not only laterally but also superiorly are usually approached transcranially. The craniotomy and exposure of the dura may be avoided when the tumor does not extend too far posteriorly and medially, by turning a larger orbital bone flap than the Krönlein's one. This technique was described by Nakamura as "type I orbitotomy" and can be referred to as a superolateral approach. After a bicoronal skin incision, a free orbital bone flap is cut. It includes the lateral orbital rim, a large external part of the superior orbital rim, and the lateral orbital wall. From 1985 to 1990 this approach was performed on 23 patients presenting with lacrimal gland tumors in 14 cases (11 pleomorphic adenomas, 2 adenoid cystic carcinomas, 1 adenocarcinoma), schwannomas in 2 cases, dermoid cyst in 1 case, hydatic cyst in 1 case, cavernous hemangiomas in 2 cases, inflammatory pseudotumor in 1 case, and mucoceles in 2 cases. This superolateral approach provides a wider exposure to the superolateral orbit than the classical Krönlein's approach and avoids the drawbacks of a craniotomy. A direct incision through the eyebrow can be used for bald people or for patients in poor condition.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is routinely performed for pain relief and to improve performance of the knee in individuals with severe knee osteoarthritis (OA). The quadriceps angle (Q-angle) is a key component of knee joint stability. However, there is a dearth of literature evaluating Q-angle as an outcome measure after TKA in individuals with severe knee OA. The objective of the study was to assess the Q-angle as an outcome measure before and after TKA and to find the correlation of Q-angle with pain, quadriceps strength, and knee flexion range of motion (ROM) after TKA in individuals with severe knee OA. The Q-angles of 34 individuals (male: female = 17:17) were measured using standardized procedures. Pain, quadriceps strength, and knee flexion ROM were measured. The measurements were taken preoperatively (one day before surgery), and postoperatively at the sixth week and third month after TKA. The mean Q-angle was 19.17° (SD = 1.92°) before TKA, 16.06° (SD = 1.87°) at the sixth week and 13.43° (SD = 1.77°) at the third month after TKA. Significant linear correlations were noted between the Q-angle and pain, quadriceps strength, and knee flexion ROM following TKA. The Q-angle was measured before and after TKA using a standardized clinical goniometric method. Understanding the Q-angle before and after TKA and its relationship with various clinical and functional variables is imperative in clinical practice for orthopedic surgeons and rehabilitation professionals.