Ben Hur Marimon-Júnior

Prof. Dr. Ben Hur Marimon-Júnior

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 November 2023 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLidong Mo
Lidong Mo
CZConstantin M. Zohner
Constantin M. Zohner
PRPeter B. Reich
Peter B. Reich
JLJingjing Liang
Jingjing Liang
Sergio de MiguelSergio de Miguel
Sergio de Miguel
TCThomas W. Crowther
Thomas W. Crowther
Forests are a substantial terrestrial carbon sink, but anthropogenic changes in land use and climate have considerably reduced the scale of this system1. Remote-sensing estimates to quantify carbon losses from global forests2–5 are characterized by considerable uncertainty and we lack a comprehensive ground-sourced evaluation to benchmark these estimates. Here we combine several ground-sourced6 and satellite-derived approaches2,7,8 to evaluate the scale of the global forest carbon potential outside agricultural and urban lands. Despite regional variation, the predictions demonstrated remarkable consistency at a global scale, with only a 12% difference between the ground-sourced and satellite-derived estimates. At present, global forest carbon storage is markedly under the natural potential, with a total deficit of 226 Gt (model range = 151–363 Gt) in areas with low human footprint. Most (61%, 139 Gt C) of this potential is in areas with existing forests, in which ecosystem protection can allow forests to recover to maturity. The remaining 39% (87 Gt C) of potential lies in regions in which forests have been removed or fragmented. Although forests cannot be a substitute for emissions reductions, our results support the idea2,3,9 that the conservation, restoration and sustainable management of diverse forests offer valuable contributions to meeting global climate and biodiversity targets.

25 February 2019 in Biodiversity and Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EMEduardo Q. Marques
Eduardo Q. Marques
BMBen Hur Marimon-Júnior
Ben Hur Marimon-Júnior
BMBeatriz Schwantes Marimon
Beatriz Schwantes Marimon
Eraldo A.T. MatricardiEraldo A.T. Matricardi
Eraldo A.T. Matricardi
HMHenrique A. Mews
Henrique A. Mews
GCGuarino R. Colli
Guarino R. Colli

23 August 2023 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CDCamille S. Delavaux
Camille S. Delavaux
TCThomas W. Crowther
Thomas W. Crowther
CZConstantin M. Zohner
Constantin M. Zohner
NRNiamh M. Robmann
Niamh M. Robmann
TLThomas Lauber
Thomas Lauber
DMDaniel S. Maynard
Daniel S. Maynard
Determining the drivers of non-native plant invasions is critical for managing native ecosystems and limiting the spread of invasive species1,2. Tree invasions in particular have been relatively overlooked, even though they have the potential to transform ecosystems and economies3,4. Here, leveraging global tree databases5–7, we explore how the phylogenetic and functional diversity of native tree communities, human pressure and the environment influence the establishment of non-native tree species and the subsequent invasion severity. We find that anthropogenic factors are key to predicting whether a location is invaded, but that invasion severity is underpinned by native diversity, with higher diversity predicting lower invasion severity. Temperature and precipitation emerge as strong predictors of invasion strategy, with non-native species invading successfully when they are similar to the native community in cold or dry extremes. Yet, despite the influence of these ecological forces in determining invasion strategy, we find evidence that these patterns can be obscured by human activity, with lower ecological signal in areas with higher proximity to shipping ports. Our global perspective of non-native tree invasion highlights that human drivers influence non-native tree presence, and that native phylogenetic and functional diversity have a critical role in the establishment and spread of subsequent invasions.

26 April 2023 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JTJulia Valentim Tavares
Julia Valentim Tavares
RORafael S. Oliveira
Rafael S. Oliveira
MMMaurizio Mencuccini
Maurizio Mencuccini
Caroline Signori-MüllerCaroline Signori-Müller
Caroline Signori-Müller
LPLuciano Pereira
Luciano Pereira
DGDavid Galbraith
David Galbraith
Tropical forests face increasing climate risk1,2, yet our ability to predict their response to climate change is limited by poor understanding of their resistance to water stress. Although xylem embolism resistance thresholds (for example, $$\varPsi $$ Ψ 50) and hydraulic safety margins (for example, HSM50) are important predictors of drought-induced mortality risk3–5, little is known about how these vary across Earth’s largest tropical forest. Here, we present a pan-Amazon, fully standardized hydraulic traits dataset and use it to assess regional variation in drought sensitivity and hydraulic trait ability to predict species distributions and long-term forest biomass accumulation. Parameters $$\varPsi $$ Ψ 50 and HSM50 vary markedly across the Amazon and are related to average long-term rainfall characteristics. Both $$\varPsi $$ Ψ 50 and HSM50 influence the biogeographical distribution of Amazon tree species. However, HSM50 was the only significant predictor of observed decadal-scale changes in forest biomass. Old-growth forests with wide HSM50 are gaining more biomass than are low HSM50 forests. We propose that this may be associated with a growth–mortality trade-off whereby trees in forests consisting of fast-growing species take greater hydraulic risks and face greater mortality risk. Moreover, in regions of more pronounced climatic change, we find evidence that forests are losing biomass, suggesting that species in these regions may be operating beyond their hydraulic limits. Continued climate change is likely to further reduce HSM50 in the Amazon6,7, with strong implications for the Amazon carbon sink.

4 September 2023 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAmy Bennett
Amy Bennett
TSThaiane Rodrigues de Sousa
Thaiane Rodrigues de Sousa
AMAbel Monteagudo-Mendoza
Abel Monteagudo-Mendoza
AEAdriane Esquivel-Muelbert
Adriane Esquivel-Muelbert
PMPaulo S. Morandi
Paulo S. Morandi
OPOliver L. Phillips
Oliver L. Phillips
The tropical forest carbon sink is known to be drought sensitive, but it is unclear which forests are the most vulnerable to extreme events. Forests with hotter and drier baseline conditions may be protected by prior adaptation, or more vulnerable because they operate closer to physiological limits. Here we report that forests in drier South American climates experienced the greatest impacts of the 2015–2016 El Niño, indicating greater vulnerability to extreme temperatures and drought. The long-term, ground-measured tree-by-tree responses of 123 forest plots across tropical South America show that the biomass carbon sink ceased during the event with carbon balance becoming indistinguishable from zero (−0.02 ± 0.37 Mg C ha−1 per year). However, intact tropical South American forests overall were no more sensitive to the extreme 2015–2016 El Niño than to previous less intense events, remaining a key defence against climate change as long as they are protected.

27 April 2020 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RTRakesh Tiwari
Rakesh Tiwari
EGEmanuel Gloor
Emanuel Gloor
WCWesley Jonatar A Da Cruz
Wesley Jonatar A Da Cruz
BMBeatriz Schwantes Marimon
Beatriz Schwantes Marimon
BMBen Hur Marimon-Júnior
Ben Hur Marimon-Júnior
DGDavid Galbraith
David Galbraith
Tropical forests are experiencing unprecedented high‐temperature conditions due to climate change that could limit their photosynthetic functions. We studied the high‐temperature sensitivity of photosynthesis in a rainforest site in southern Amazonia, where some of the highest temperatures and most rapid warming in the Tropics have been recorded. The quantum yield (Fv/Fm) of photosystem II was measured in seven dominant tree species using leaf discs exposed to varying levels of heat stress. T50 was calculated as the temperature at which Fv/Fm was half the maximum value. T5 is defined as the breakpoint temperature, at which Fv/Fm decline was initiated. Leaf thermotolerance in the rapidly warming southern Amazonia was the highest recorded for forest tree species globally. T50 and T5 varied between species, with one mid‐storey species, Amaioua guianensis, exhibiting particularly high T50 and T5 values. While the T50 values of the species sampled were several degrees above the maximum air temperatures experienced in southern Amazonia, the T5 values of several species are now exceeded under present‐day maximum air temperatures.