Omer Saeed

Omer Saeed


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2021 in Human Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OSOmer Saeed
Omer Saeed
SMSteven A. Mann
Steven A. Mann
CLClaudio Luchini
Claudio Luchini
KHKun Huang
Kun Huang
SZShaobo Zhang
Shaobo Zhang
Liang ChengLiang Cheng
Liang Cheng

2 June 2018 in Histopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KTKaren E Trevino
Karen E Trevino
AEAlaleh Esmaeili‐Shandiz
Alaleh Esmaeili‐Shandiz
OSOmer Saeed
Omer Saeed
HXHuiping Xu
Huiping Xu
TUThomas M. Ulbright
Thomas M. Ulbright
MIMuhammad T Idrees
Muhammad T Idrees

27 October 2017 in Diagnostic Cytopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OSOmer Saeed
Omer Saeed
HCHarvey Cramer
Harvey Cramer
XWXiaoyan Wang
Xiaoyan Wang
HWHoward H. Wu
Howard H. Wu

28 January 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Asad UllahAsad Ullah
Asad Ullah
OSOmer Saeed
Omer Saeed
Nabin R KarkiNabin R Karki
Nabin R Karki
MGMya Goodbee
Mya Goodbee
AYAbdul Qahar Khan Yasinzai
Abdul Qahar Khan Yasinzai
Jaffar KhanJaffar Khan
Jaffar Khan
Background: Primary lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States (US). Approximately 90% of lung cancers are associated with smoking and the use of other tobacco products. Based on histology, lung cancers are divided into small-cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs) and non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs). Most SCLCs are of the pure subtype, while the rare combined SCLCs contain elements of both small-cell and non-small-cell morphologies. This study sought to evaluate the demographics, clinical factors, molecular abnormalities, treatment approaches, and survival outcomes with combined SCLC and NSCLCs. Materials and Methods: Data on 2126 combined SCLC patients was extracted from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database from 2000 to 2018. Data extracted for analyses included age, sex, race, tumor size, tumor location, metastasis status, stage at diagnosis, treatment received, and treatment outcomes. Multivariate analysis was performed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) software. Results: The patients had a median age of 68 years; 43.9% of the patients were female and 56.1% were male; 84.5% were White and 11.7% were African Americans. The majority of patients had a poorly differentiated disease at 29.6%; 17% were undifferentiated, 3.2% were moderately differentiated, and 0.8% were well differentiated. Chemotherapy was the most common treatment modality (45.3%); 17% underwent surgery only, 10.3% underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, and 10% underwent radiation after surgery. Five-year cancer-specific survival was 15.2% with surgery alone, and combined surgery and chemotherapy provided the highest percentages (38.3% and 34.7%, respectively). Females had significantly higher 1- and 5-year cancer-specific survival rates compared to males (59.3% and 29.9% vs. 48.0% and 23.7, respectively; p < 0.001). Well-differentiated tumors had significantly higher survival compared to other gradings (p < 0.001). Survival decreased as tumor staging moved distally from localized to regional to distant (p < 0.001). Metastasis to bone, liver, brain, and lung significantly decreased survival in comparison to patients who did not have any metastasis (p < 0.001). Females had significantly shorter survival compared to their counterparts when metastasis was to the bone, brain, or liver (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified male sex (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.2), undifferentiated grade (HR = 1.9), regional extent of disease (HR = 1.7), distant extent of disease (HR = 3.7), and metastasis to liver (HR = 3.5) as variables associated with worse survival. Conclusion: Combined SCLC is overall very rare. However, the frequency of presentation with combined SCLC is on the rise, in part due to improvements in diagnostic techniques. Despite advances in therapies, treating combined SCLC is challenging, and novel therapies are not utilized, owing to low rates of targetable mutations. Combined SCLC has higher survival rates if well differentiated.

6 April 2023 in Diagnostic Cytopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KCKatrina Collins
Katrina Collins
BYBianca Puello Yocum
Bianca Puello Yocum
HMHector Mesa
Hector Mesa
HCHarvey Cramer
Harvey Cramer
OSOmer Saeed
Omer Saeed
Background: The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) versus endoscopic biopsy for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial lesions (SELs) using surgical resection as the gold standard.Methods: All patients who underwent EUS-FNA of upper and lower GI SELs over a 10-year period (2010 through 2019) were retrospectively reviewed. The medical records of all patients were reviewed and data extracted from the endoscopy, pathology, and surgical reports were analyzed.Results: In total, 283 patients with ages ranging from 21 to 92 years underwent EUS-FNA for evaluation of GI SELs, 117 (41%) patients underwent endoscopic biopsy and 82 (29%) patients had concurrent surgical resection specimen. EUS-FNA was obtained from the stomach in 167 (59%) patients, duodenum in 51 (18%) patients, esophagus in 38 (13%) patients, and colorectum in 27 (10%) patients. It was found that the largest percentage of lesions originated in the muscularis propria (36%), followed by the submucosa (26%), deep mucosa (13%), and not specified in 21%. The concordance between EUS-FNA and endoscopic biopsy was good (correlation coefficient of 0.631, p < .001). EUS-FNA versus endoscopic biopsy in resected cases showed sensitivity and specificity of 78% versus 68% and 84% versus 100%, respectively. The EUS-FNA has an accuracy of 80% compared to 74% in biopsy. The diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA and endoscopic biopsy was 64% versus 55%.Conclusion: EUS-FNA is more sensitive and more accurate than endoscopic biopsy for diagnosing GI SELs with a good concordance between the two techniques.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jaffar KhanJaffar Khan
Jaffar Khan
AUAsad Ullah
Asad Ullah
AYAbdul Qahar Khan Yasinzai
Abdul Qahar Khan Yasinzai
AWAbdul Waheed
Abdul Waheed
KBKalyani Ballur
Kalyani Ballur
OSOmer Saeed
Omer Saeed
Background: Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the gallbladder (NECs-GB) are rare tumors, accounting for <0.2% of all neuroendocrine carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract. They originate from the neuroendocrine cells of the gallbladder epithelium with associated intestinal or gastric metaplasia. The current study is the largest study from the SEER database on NECs-GB that aims to elucidate the demographic, clinical, and pathologic factors influencing the prognosis and comparative survival analysis of different treatment modalities. Methods: The data from 176 patients with NECs-GB was abstracted from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database (2000–2018). Multivariate analysis, non-parametric survival analysis, and a chi-square test were used to analyze the data. Results: NECs-GB had a higher incidence amongst females (72.7%) and Caucasians (72.7%). Most patients had surgery only (N = 52, 29.5%), (N = 40) 22.7% had chemotherapy only, and (N = 23) 13.1% had chemotherapy with surgery. Only (N = 17) 9.7% had trimodaltiy (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy), and for (N = 41) 23.3% the status of chemotherapy was unknown, and these cases had neither radiation nor surgery. Conclusion: NECs-GB more frequently affects Caucasian females after the 6th decade of life. The combination of surgery, radiation, and adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better long-term (5 years) outcomes, while surgery alone was associated with better short-term (<2 years) outcome survival.