Matteo Benedetti

Prof. Matteo Benedetti

University of Trento, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2021 in Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Matteo BenedettiMatteo Benedetti
Matteo Benedetti
Anton Du PlessisAnton Du Plessis
Anton Du Plessis
RRR.O. Ritchie
R.O. Ritchie
MDMichele Dallago
Michele Dallago
Nima RazaviNima Razavi
Nima Razavi
FBF. Berto
F. Berto

1 July 2017 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Matteo BenedettiMatteo Benedetti
Matteo Benedetti
ETE. Torresani
E. Torresani
MLM. Leoni
M. Leoni
Vigilio FontanariVigilio Fontanari
Vigilio Fontanari
MBM. Bandini
M. Bandini
CPC. Potrich
C. Potrich

1 January 2021 in International Journal of Fatigue
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMichele Dallago
Michele Dallago
SRS. Raghavendra
S. Raghavendra
VLV. Luchin
V. Luchin
GZG. Zappini
G. Zappini
DPD. Pasini
D. Pasini
Matteo BenedettiMatteo Benedetti
Matteo Benedetti


7 May 2019 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Matteo BenedettiMatteo Benedetti
Matteo Benedetti
JKJohanna Klarin
Johanna Klarin
FJFrida Johansson
Frida Johansson
Vigilio FontanariVigilio Fontanari
Vigilio Fontanari
VLValerio Luchin
Valerio Luchin
Alberto MolinariAlberto Molinari
Alberto Molinari
The aim of this paper was to investigate the compression properties of several trabecular structures produced by additive laser manufacturing of a Ti6Al4V, having different densities and unit cells. Filling space structures were investigated, with different unit cells characterized by both bending-dominated and stretching-dominated behaviour. The stiffness and yield strength were correlated to relative density according to the Gibson and Ashby model. For a constant porosity, the stiffness and the yield strength varied between two extremes represented by the cubic structure (stretching-dominated deformation) and the cross structure (bending-dominated deformation). The properties of the deformed structures did not differ substantially from those of the regular structures. Only in the cubic structure did distortion enhance the contribution of bending to deformation and both stiffness and strength decreased. Cross structures displayed the highest strength at constant stiffness than the others, since they are characterized by the most favourable orientation of the struts.

15 September 2004 in Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Matteo BenedettiMatteo Benedetti
Matteo Benedetti
Vigilio FontanariVigilio Fontanari
Vigilio Fontanari