SUMMARY: Despite the early recognition of their therapeutic potential and the current escalation of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, the adoption of bacteriophages into mainstream clinical practice is hindered by unfamiliarity with their basic pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties, among others. Given the self-replicative nature of bacteriophages in the presence of host bacteria, the adsorption rate, and the clearance by the host’s immunity, their PK/PD characteristics cannot be estimated by conventional approaches, and thus, the introduction of new considerations is required. Furthermore, the multitude of different bacteriophage types, preparations, and treatment schedules impedes drawing general conclusions on their in vivo PK/PD features. Additionally, the drawback of acquired bacteriophage resistance of MDR pathogens with clinical and environmental implications should be taken into consideration. Here, we provide an overview of the current state of the field of PK and PD of bacteriophage therapy with a focus on its application against MDR Gram-negative infections, highlighting the potential knowledge gaps and the challenges in translation from the bench to the bedside. After reviewing the in vitro PKs and PDs of bacteriophages against the four major MDR Gram-negative pathogens, Klebsiella pneumoniae , Acinetobacter baumannii complex, Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Escherichia coli , specific data on in vivo PKs (tissue distribution, route of administration, and basic PK parameters in animals and humans) and PDs (survival and reduction of bacterial burden in relation to the route of administration, timing of therapy, dosing regimens, and resistance) are summarized. Currently available data merit close scrutiny, and optimization of bacteriophage therapy in the context of a better understanding of the underlying PK/PD principles is urgent to improve its therapeutic effect and to minimize the occurrence of bacteriophage resistance.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and the emergence of Candida auris have changed the epidemiological landscape of candidaemia worldwide. Aim: We compared the epidemiological trends of candidaemia in a Greek tertiary academic hospital before (2009–2018) and during the early COVID-19 (2020–2021) and late COVID-19/early post-pandemic (2022–2023) era. Methods: Incidence rates, species distribution, antifungal susceptibility profile and antifungal consumption were recorded, and one-way ANOVA or Fisher’s exact test performed. Species were identified by MALDI-ToF MS, and in vitro susceptibility determined with CLSI M27-Ed4 for C. auris and the EUCAST-E.DEF 7.3.2 for other Candida spp. Results: In total, 370 candidaemia episodes were recorded during the COVID-19 pandemic. Infection incidence (2.0 episodes/10,000 hospital bed days before, 3.9 during the early and 5.1 during the late COVID-19 era, p < 0.0001), C. auris (0%, 9% and 33%, p < 0.0001) and fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis species complex (SC) (20%, 24% and 33%, p = 0.06) infections increased over time, with the latter not associated with increase in fluconazole/voriconazole consumption. A significant increase over time was observed in fluconazole-resistant isolates regardless of species (8%, 17% and 41%, p < 0.0001). Resistance to amphotericin B or echinocandins was not recorded, with the exception of a single pan-echinocandin-resistant C. auris strain. Conclusion: Candidaemia incidence nearly tripled during the COVID-19 era, with C. auris among the major causative agents and increasing fluconazole resistance in C. parapsilosis SC. Almost half of Candida isolates were fluconazole-resistant, underscoring the need for increased awareness and strict implementation of infection control measures.

Double-layer agar (DLA) overlay plaque assay is the gold standard for phage enumeration. However, it is cumbersome and time-consuming. Given the great interest in phage therapy, we explored alternative assays for phage quantitation. A total of 16 different phages belonging to Myoviridae, Siphoviridae, and Podoviridae families were quantitated with five K . pneumoniae, eight P . aeruginosa, and three A . baumannii host isolates. Phages were quantitated with the standard DLA assay (10 mL of LB soft agar 0.7% on LB hard agar 1.5%) and the new single-layer agar (SLA) assay (10 mL of LB soft agar 0.7%) with phages spread (spread) into or spotted (spot) onto soft agar. Phage concentrations with each assay were correlated with the standard assay, and the relative and absolute differences between each assay and the standard double-layer agar spread were calculated. Phage concentrations 1 × 10 ⁴ –8.3 x10 ¹² PFU/mL with the standard DLA assay were quantitated with SLA-spread, SLA-spot, and DLA-spot assays, and the median (range) relative and absolute differences were <10% and 0.77, P < 0.01). Moreover, plaques could be quantified at 37°C after 4-h incubation for K. pneumoniae phages and 6-h incubation for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii phages, and estimated concentrations remained the same over 24 hours. Compared to DLA assay, the SLA-spot assay required less media, it was 10 times faster, and generated same-day results. The SLA-spot assay was cheaper, faster, easier to perform, and generated similar phage concentrations as the standard DLA-spread assay.

• A Candida co-infection can be either primary- or secondarily acquired, i.e., presented together with or following the onset of COVID-19 disease (super-infection). • Immunosuppressants, such as corticosteroids and anti-IL-6 agents, predispose to fungal overgrowth and translocation from the gastrointestinal tract to the bloodstream. • Critically ill COVID-19 patients often presented altered fecal mycobiomes, enriched with members of the genus Candida. • Candida spp. from blood followed Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria as the most common nosocomial isolates in patients already infected with COVID-19. • It has been reported that hospital-onset candidemia rate significantly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, however incidence varied significantly between studies. • C. albicans led the isolates in COVID-19 and invasive Candida co-infection in several reports, while the reported incidence of C. parapsilosis and C.auris increased during the pandemic. • The knowledge of Candida spp. local epidemiology, concerning resistance to antifungal agents, remains crucial for the selection of the empirical antifungal treatment. • During the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase in the frequency of resistance to fluconazole have been reported. • The first-line treatment consists of intravenous administration of fluconazole (unless there is local-resistance to fluconazole or suspicion for C. auris) or an echinocandin. • C. auris is a troublesome pathogen as it can persist in the hospital environment and has modes of transmission like multidrug resistant bacteria. The treatment of C. auris is challenging, as it may present resistance to several (or even all) major antifungal classes, i.e., polyenes, azoles, and echinocandins. • Invasive Candida on critically ill patients with COVID-19, increasing morbidity and mortality. Proper awareness and prevention efforts might decrease their incidence and improve their prognosis.

In the light of increasing antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative bacteria and the lack of new more potent antimicrobial agents, new strategies have been explored. Old antibiotics, such as colistin, temocillin, fosfomycin, mecillinam, nitrofurantoin, minocycline, and chloramphenicol, have attracted the attention since they often exhibit in vitro activity against multi-drug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. The current review provides a summary of the in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics and PK/PD characteristics of old antibiotics. In silico modelling was then performed using Monte Carlo simulation in order to combine all preclinical data with human pharmacokinetics and determine the probability of target (1-log kill in thigh/lung infection animal models) attainment (PTA) of different dosing regimens. The potential of clinical efficacy of a drug against severe infections by MDR gram-negative bacteria was considered when PTA was >95% at the epidemiological cutoff values of corresponding species. In vitro potent activity against MDR gram-negative pathogens has been shown for colistin, polymyxin B, temocillin (against E. coli and K. pneumoniae), fosfomycin (against E. coli), mecillinam (against E. coli), minocycline (against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii), and chloramphenicol (against E. coli) with ECOFF or MIC₉₀ ≤ 16 mg/L. When preclinical PK/PD targets were combined with human pharmacokinetics, Monte Carlo analysis showed that among the old antibiotics analyzed, there is clinical potential for polymyxin B against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and A. baumannii; for temocillin against K. pneumoniae and E. coli; for fosfomycin against E. coli and K. pneumoniae; and for mecillinam against E. coli. Clinical studies are needed to verify the potential of those antibiotics to effectively treat infections by multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria.