The ever-increasing yields in genome sequence data production pose a computational challenge to current genome sequence analysis tools, jeopardizing the future of personalized medicine. Leveraging hardware accelerators (GPUs, FPGAs, and ASICs) to accelerate computationally-intensive algorithms like sequence alignment has become paramount. Recently, the wavefront alignment algorithm was introduced, significantly reducing the execution time to perform sequence alignment. This paper presents the first-ever ASIC accelerator of the WFA integrated into a RISC-V system-on-chip. Our designed chip greatly accelerates sequence alignment, delivering up to 1076 × better performance over the CPU implementation of the WFA running on the RISC-V core of the chip.

Dynamic Task Scheduling is an enticing programming model aiming to ease the development of parallel programs with intrinsically irregular or data-dependent parallelism. The performance of such solutions relies on the ability of the Task Scheduling HW/SW stack to efficiently evaluate dependencies at runtime and schedule work to available cores. Traditional SW-only systems implicate scheduling overheads of around 30K processor cycles per task, which severely limit the ( core count , task granularity ) combinations that they might adequately handle. Previous work on HW-accelerated Task Scheduling has shown that such systems might support high performance scheduling on processors with up to eight cores, but questions remained regarding the viability of such solutions to support the greater number of cores now frequently found in high-end SMP systems. The present work presents an FPGA-proven, tightly-integrated, Linux-capable, 30-core RISC-V system with hardware accelerated Task Scheduling. We use this implementation to show that HW Task Scheduling can still offer competitive performance at such high core count, and describe how this organization includes hardware and software optimizations that make it even more scalable than previous solutions. Finally, we outline ways in which this architecture could be augmented to overcome inter-core communication bottlenecks, mitigating the cache-degradation effects usually involved in the parallelization of highly optimized serial code.

Processor simulators rely on detailed timing models of the processor pipeline to evaluate performance. The diversity in real-world processor designs mandates building flexible simulators that expose parts of the underlying model to the user in the form of configurable parameters. Consequently, the accuracy of modeling a real processor relies on both the accuracy of the pipeline model itself, and the accuracy of adjusting the configuration parameters according to the modeled processor. Unfortunately, processor vendors publicly disclose only a subset of their design decisions, raising the probability of introducing specification inaccuracies when modeling these processors. Inaccurately tuning model parameters deviates the simulated processor from the actual one. In the worst case, using improper parameters may lead to imbalanced pipeline models compromising the simulation output. Therefore, simulation models should be hardware-validated before using them for performance evaluation. As processors increase in complexity and diversity, validating a simulator model against real hardware becomes increasingly more challenging and time-consuming. In this work, we propose a methodology for validating simulation models against real hardware. We create a framework that relies on micro-benchmarks to collect performance statistics on real hardware, and machine learning-based algorithms to fine-tune the unknown parameters based on the accumulated statistics. We overhaul the Sniper simulator to support the ARM AArch64 instruction-set architecture (ISA), and introduce two new timing models for ARM-based in-order and out-of-order cores. Using our proposed simulator validation framework, we tune the in-order and out-of-order models to match the performance of a real-world implementation of the Cortex-A53 and Cortex-A72 cores with an average error of 7% and 15%, respectively, across a set of SPEC CPU2017 benchmarks.

Over the years, Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA) have been gaining popularity in the High Performance Computing (HPC) field, because their reconfigurability enables very fine-grained optimizations with low energy cost. However, the different characteristics, architectures, and network topologies of the clusters have hindered the use of FPGAs at a large scale. In this work, we present an evolution of OmpSs@FPGA, a high-level task-based programming model and extension to OmpSs-2, that aims at unifying all FPGA clusters by using a message-passing interface that is compatible with FPGA accelerators. These accelerators are programmed with C/C++ pragmas, and synthesized with High-Level Synthesis tools. The new framework includes a custom protocol to exchange messages between FPGAs, agnostic of the architecture and network type. On top of that, we present a new communication paradigm called Implicit Message Passing (IMP), where the user does not need to call any message-passing API. Instead, the runtime automatically infers data movement beetween nodes. We test classic message passing and IMP with three benchmarks on two different FPGA clusters. One is cloudFPGA, a disaggregated platform with AMD FPGAs that are only connected to the network through UDP/TCP/IP. The other is ESSPER, composed of CPU-attached Intel FPGAs that have a private network at the ethernet level. In both cases, we demonstrate that IMP with OmpSs@FPGA can increase the productivity of FPGA programmers at a large scale thanks to simplifying communication between nodes, without limiting the scalability of applications. We implement the N-body, Heat simulation and Cholesky decomposition benchmarks, and show that FPGA clusters get 2.6x and 2.4x better performance per watt than a CPU-only supercomputer for N-body and Heat.

The goal of modern high performance computing platforms is to combine low power consumption and high throughput. Within the European Processor Initiative (EPI), such an SoC platform to meet the novel exascale requirements is built and investigated. As part of this project, we introduce an embedded Field Programmable Gate Array (eFPGA), adding flexibility to accelerate various workloads. In this article, we show our approach to design the eFPGA tile that supports the EPI SoC. While eFPGAs are inherently reconfigurable, their initial design has to be determined for tape-out. The design space of the eFPGA is explored and evaluated with different configurations of two HPC workloads, covering control and dataflow heavy applications. As a result, we present a well-balanced eFPGA design that can host several use cases and potential future ones by allocating 1% of the total EPI SoC area. Finally, our simulation results of the architectures on the eFPGA show great performance improvements over their software counterparts.

X-ray crystallography is a powerful method that has significantly contributed to our understanding of the biological function of proteins and other molecules. This method relies on the production of crystals that, however, are usually a bottleneck in the process. For some molecules, no crystallization has been achieved or insufficient crystals were obtained. Some other systems do not crystallize at all, such as nanoparticles which, because of their dimensions, cannot be treated by the usual crystallographic methods. To solve this, whole pair distribution function has been proposed to bridge the gap between Bragg and Debye scattering theories. To execute a fitting, the spectra of several different constructs, composed of millions of particles each, should be computed using a particle–pair or particle–particle (pp) distance algorithm. Using this computation as a test bench for current field-programmable gate array (FPGA) technology, we evaluate how the parallel computation capability of FPGAs can be exploited to reduce the computation time. We present two different solutions to the problem using two state-of-the-art FPGA technologies. In the first one, the main C program uses OmpSs (a high-level programming model developed at the Barcelona Supercomputing Center, that enables task offload to different high-performance computing devices) for task invocation, and kernels are built with OpenCL using reduced data sizes to save transmission time. The second approach uses task and data parallelism to operate on data locally and update data globally in a decoupled task. Benchmarks have been evaluated over an Intel D5005 Programmable Acceleration Card, computing a model of 2 million particles in 81.57 s – 24.5 billion atom pairs per second (bapps)– and over a ZU102 in 115.31 s. In our last test, over an up-to-date Alveo U200 board, the computation lasted for 34.68 s (57.67 bapps). In this study, we analyze the results in relation to the classic terms of speed-up and efficiency and give hints for future improvements focused on reducing the global job time.