The novel Contour device is an intrasaccular flow disruption device designed for treatment of intracranial wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. Outside its original purpose, Contour implantation can be used to treat aneurysms with a higher dome-to-neck ratio which would be suitable for conventional unassisted coil embolization. We compared both techniques in a retrospective single-center analysis. A total of 42 aneurysms from 42 patients with a dome-to-neck ratio of 1.6 or higher were included in this study. Data on technical success, implantation times, radiation dosages, procedural complications, reinterventions and recurrences were gathered and compared. Technical success was achieved in all cases with both techniques. Aneurysm embolization was achieved significantly faster in the Contour group compared to coiling (Overall p = 0.0002; r = 0.580; acute setting: p = 0.005, r = 0.531; elective setting: p = 0.002, r = 0.607). Significantly less radiation dosage was applied in the Contour group (Overall p = 0.002; r = 0.478; acute group p = 0.006; r = 0.552; elective group p = 0.045; r = 0.397). The number of complications was higher in the coiling group compared to the Contour group (Coiling 7/21 (33,3%); Contour 3/21 (14.3%). There was a higher rate of reinterventions in the coiling group (7.6% vs 21.4%). Outside its original intention, the Contour device seems to be a safe and fast alternative to coil embolization for the treatment of narrow-neck-aneurysms.

Purpose. Contrast-enhanced (CE) angiographic techniques, such as computed tomographic angiography (CE-CTA), are most commonly used for follow-up imaging after endovascular aneurysm repair. In this study, CE-CTA and non-CE QISS-MRA were compared for the first time for assessing endoleaks and aneurysms at follow-up after abdominal EVAR. Methods. Our study included 20 patients (17 male, median age 79.8 years) who underwent radial QISS-MRA and CE-CTA after EVAR at their first follow-up examination. Two interventional radiologists evaluated datasets from both techniques in each patient concerning presence of endoleaks, types of endoleaks, aneurysm diameter, and image quality. Interobserver and intermodal agreement were assessed with Cohen’s Kappa. Results. Image quality was rated as excellent or good for both modalities by both observers. Ferromagnetic embolization materials cause hyperdense artifacts in CE-CTA causing aneurysm sac diameter measurements to be inaccurate by up to 1 cm. Type 2 endoleaks with low-flow characteristics in CE-CTA were overlooked compared to radial QISS-MRA. Compared to CE-CTA, all endoleaks after abdominal EVAR were detected and classified correctly on QISS-MRA. The interobserver agreement between CE-CTA and QISS-MRA was almost perfect, except for type 2 endoleaks, where agreement was substantial. Intermodal aneurysm diameter correlate “very strongly” for both observers. Conclusions. Radial QISS-MRA is a contrast agent free technique for diagnosing and monitoring all types of endoleaks and aneurysms in patients after abdominal EVAR. It provides information about specific clinical questions concerning aneurysm diameter and presence and types of endoleaks without radiation exposure and the side effects associated with iodine-based contrast agents.

Introduction: Unilateral pulmonary edema (UPE) is a potential complication after mitral valve surgery (MVS), and its cause is not yet fully understood. Definitions are inconsistent, and previous studies have reported wide variance in the incidence of UPE. This research aims at the evaluation of the Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) score concerning assessment of UPE after MVS in order to provide an accurate and consistent definition of this pathology. Methods and Results: Postoperative chest X-ray images of 676 patients after MVS (minimally invasive MVS, n = 434; conventional MVS, n = 242) were retrospectively analyzed concerning presence of UPE. UPE was diagnosed only after exclusion of other pathologies up until the eighth postoperative day. RALE values were calculated for each patient. ROC analysis was performed to assess diagnostic performance. UPE was diagnosed in 18 patients (2.8%). UPE occurred significantly more often in the MI-MVS group (p = 0.045; MI-MVS n = 15; C-MVS n = 3). Postoperative RALE values for the right hemithorax (Q1 + Q2) > 12 and the right-to-left RALE difference ((Q1 + Q2) − (Q3 + Q4)) > 13 provide a sensitivity of up to 100% and 94.4% and a specificity of up to 88.4% and 94.2% for UPE detection. Conclusion: The RALE score is a practical tool for assessment of chest X-ray images after MVS with regard to UPE and provides a clear definition of UPE. In addition, it enables objective comparability when assessing of the postoperative course. The given score thresholds provide a sensitivity and specificity of up to 94%. Further, UPE after MVS seems to be a rather rare pathology with an incidence of 2.6%.

Emergency computed tomography (CT) often does not allow for comprehensive coronary artery assessment. However, CT may reveal pathological myocardial hypoperfusion suggestive of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), especially in patients presenting with a different diagnostic hypothesis. CT hypoperfusion is known to be associated with myocardial infarction, however the diagnostic value of CT hypoperfusion for the detection of AMI is still not well evaluated. This was a single-centre retrospective study including patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) due to suspected AMI based on incidental perfusion defects upon emergency CT imaging between 2018 and 2023. A total of 22 patients (mean age 66.3 ± 10.8 years, 11 female) were included in this analysis. The diagnosis of AMI was established in all cases leading to ICA. Culprit coronary artery lesions with an indication of percutaneous coronary intervention were detected in all patients who underwent ICA. Spearmann correlation for hypoperfused segments on CT imaging and the corresponding vascular territory upon ICA was significantly substantial (ρ = 0.73, p = < 0.001). The higher the number of affected myocardial segments, the faster ICA was initiated. Mean time between the suspicion of AMI on CT imaging and ICA was 196 (29–4044) minutes. Myocardial hypoperfusion on emergency CT imaging should be considered as AMI until proven otherwise, independent of the clinical scenario leading to performance of CT imaging and whether imaging was performed for the exclusion of non-cardiac pathologies. Early initiation of further diagnostic workup may potentially avoid delays to invasive treatment and reduce the CT-to-catheter-time. Our study explicitly underlines that myocardial hypoperfusion upon contrast enhanced CT imaging needs to be considered as sign of acute myocardial infarction and indicates targeted clinical workup to rule out this diagnosis and to shorten the timeframe from imaging diagnosis to interventional treatment.

Objective: In this study, we report our experience with the occurrence of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesions following aneurysm treatment with Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device and Contour Neurovascular System in elective settings. We compared both techniques in a retrospective single-center analysis, to investigate whether there are significant differences in the incidence of microemboli depending on the device used. Materials and methods: Sixty-two cases treated with Contour were retrospectively compared with 84 WEB cases. Postinterventional MRI was performed in all patients within five days after the angiographic procedure. Only DWI lesions in the dependent vascular territory of the treated aneurysm were considered. Data on occurrence of DWI lesions, device implantation times as well as device change or repositions maneuvers were compared. Results: A total of 146 patients were included in this study. Postinterventional DWI lesions were detected in 33 of the 62 (53.2%) Contour cases and in 36 of the 84 (42.8%) WEB cases with an average lesion number of 1.70 ± 3.45 in our WEB group and 1.68 ± 2.53 in our Contour cohort. Neither periinterventional device changes nor device reposition maneuvers had a significant impact on the occurrence of DWI lesions. Although four patients experienced transient neurological deterioration, the DWI lesions were not clinically relevant at the time of discharge, as the patients’ NIHSS remained stable compared to the preintervention NIHSS in the entire cohort. There was no statistically significant difference between the implantation times of WEB and Contour, although Contour could be implanted slightly faster. Conclusion: Aneurysm treatment with WEB or Contour results in a comparable numbers of procedure-related DWI lesions. This effect was consistent after adjustment for other demographic or technical variables.

Introduction: Treatment of basilar apex aneurysms will remain challenging regarding the nobility of the parent vessel and their often wide-necked configuration. With endovascular techniques being the treatment approach of choice, novel intrasaccular flow-disruption devices constitute an endovascular embolization option. In this research, we report our experiences in embolizing basilar tip aneurysms with the novel Contour device. Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of eight patients after Contour implantation into a basilar apex aneurysm. Periprocedural data on intervention times, radiation dose, procedural success and complications were gathered. All patients received follow-up digital subtraction angiography after six months. Further follow-up examination results were analysed given their availability. Results: Contour implantation was successful in all patients. The mean device instrumentation time was 18.8 ± 7.7 min with a mean full intervention time of 100 ± 65.8 min. The mean full procedure radiation dose was 1917 (421–5107) cGy/cm ² . After six months, six aneurysms were occluded (Raymond Roy Scale (RRS) 1/2), one showed perfusion inside the device (RRS 3a) and one patient had undergone reintervention due to progression. The aneurysm with constant perfusion at six months was seen to be occluded after 24 months. Conclusion: Contour device implantation is a promising feasible alternative endovascular method for embolization of intracranial aneurysms located in the basilar tip with short intervention times and low radiation dosages. Short- and medium-term follow-ups show promising results concerning aneurysm occlusion and reinterventions, however further research is needed to show long-term stability.