Achal Lama

Dr. Achal Lama


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 October 2023 in Applied Soft Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRSoumik Ray
Soumik Ray
ALAchal Lama
Achal Lama
Pradeep MishraPradeep Mishra
Pradeep Mishra
TBTufleuddin Biswas
Tufleuddin Biswas
SDSoumitra Sankar Das
Soumitra Sankar Das
BGBishal Gurung
Bishal Gurung

1 September 2021 in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNiraj Biswakarma
Niraj Biswakarma
VPVijay Pooniya
Vijay Pooniya
RZR.R. Zhiipao
R.R. Zhiipao
DKDinesh Kumar
Dinesh Kumar
AVA.K. Verma
A.K. Verma
KSKarivaradharajan Swarnalakshmi
Karivaradharajan Swarnalakshmi

28 February 2023 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pankaj DasPankaj Das
Pankaj Das
GJGirish Kumar Jha
Girish Kumar Jha
ALAchal Lama
Achal Lama
RPRajender Parsad
Rajender Parsad
This paper introduces a novel hybrid approach, combining machine learning algorithms with feature selection, for efficient modelling and forecasting of complex phenomenon governed by multifactorial and nonlinear behaviours, such as crop yield. We have attempted to harness the benefits of the soft computing algorithm multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) for feature selection coupled with support vector regression (SVR) and artificial neural network (ANN) for efficiently mapping the relationship between the predictors and predictand variables using the MARS-ANN and MARS-SVR hybrid frameworks. The performances of the algorithms are com-pared on different fit statistics such as RMSE, MAD, MAPE, etc., using numeric agronomic traits of 518 lentil genotypes to predict grain yield. The proposed MARS-based hybrid models outperformed individual models such as MARS, SVR and ANN. This is largely due to the enhanced feature ex-traction capability of the MARS model coupled with the nonlinear adaptive learning ability of ANN and SVR. The superiority of the proposed hybrid models MARS-ANN and MARS-SVM in terms of model building and generalisation ability was demonstrated.

17 February 2021 in Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ALAchal Lama
Achal Lama
KSK. N. Singh
K. N. Singh
HSHerojit Singh
Herojit Singh
RSRavindra Shekhawat
Ravindra Shekhawat
Pradeep MishraPradeep Mishra
Pradeep Mishra
BGBishal Gurung
Bishal Gurung

5 February 2025 in Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BJBellamkonda Jyostna
Bellamkonda Jyostna
AMAdmala Meena
Admala Meena
SRSantosha Rathod
Santosha Rathod
MTMangal Deep Tuti
Mangal Deep Tuti
KCKapil Choudhary
Kapil Choudhary
AKAnil Kumar
Anil Kumar

15 March 2024 in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MCManojit Chowdhury
Manojit Chowdhury
TKTapan Kumar Khura
Tapan Kumar Khura
PUPravin Kumar Upadhyay
Pravin Kumar Upadhyay
RPROAF AHMAD PARRAY
ROAF AHMAD PARRAY
HKH. L. Kushwaha
H. L. Kushwaha
IMIndra Mani
Indra Mani
Nitrogen responses vary under diverse agronomic management practices, influencing vegetation indices (VIs) and productivity across different ecological conditions. However, the proper quantification of these responses under various crop establishment methods with varied nitrogen levels is rarely studied. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted to investigate the impact of varying nitrogen levels on VIs, growth parameters, yield attributes, yield, and economic aspects of transplanted rice (TR) and direct-seeded rice (DSR). The experiment was conducted in the randomized block design consisted seven N levels, which included 0% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) or no nitrogen (N0), 33.33% RDN (N1), 66.66% RDN (N2), 100% RDN (N3), 133.33% RDN (N4), 166.66% RDN (N5) and 200% RDN (N6), and replicated thrice. The plots with higher N levels demonstrated increased values of VIs and treatment N3 (120 kg N ha−1), N4 (160 kg N ha−1), N5 (200 kg N ha−1), and N6 (240 kg N ha−1) showed no statistically significant differences in NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index), RVI (ratio vegetation index), NDRE (normalized difference red edge), and GNDVI (green normalized difference vegetation index) values across the various growth stages of rice. The application of treatment N4 resulted in the highest number of panicles m−2 (348.2 in TR, 376.8 in DSR), filled grains panicle−1 (74.55 in TR, 62.43 in DSR), and a 1,000-grain weight of 26.92 g in TR and 26.76 g in DSR. The maximum yield (4.89 t ha−1) was obtained in transplanted rice at treatment N4 and, 8.15% yield reduction was noted in DSR for the same treatment, which was statistically equivalent to N3, but significantly superior to other N levels. Conversely, in DSR with RDN (120 kg N ha−1), the cost–benefit ratio surpassed that of TR by 16.96%, signifying DSR’s adaptability for more profitable rice cultivation in the region. This research provides valuable insights into optimizing nitrogen management practices for TR and DSR, thereby enhancing rice crop performance and economic returns.