Andrew C. Kummel

Prof. Dr. Andrew C. Kummel


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2014 in Surface Science Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAlexander Liberman
Alexander Liberman
NMNatalie Mendez
Natalie Mendez
WTWilliam C. Trogler
William C. Trogler
AKAndrew C. Kummel
Andrew C. Kummel

6 October 2017 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJun Hong Park
Jun Hong Park
ASAtresh Sanne
Atresh Sanne
YGYuzheng Guo
Yuzheng Guo
MAMatin Amani
Matin Amani
KZKehao Zhang
Kehao Zhang
AKAndrew C. Kummel
Andrew C. Kummel
Adsorption of organic molecules passivates defect states on single-layer MoS 2 via charge transfer.

13 March 2015 in Advanced Energy Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKasra Sardashti
Kasra Sardashti
RHRichard Haight
Richard Haight
TGTayfun Gokmen
Tayfun Gokmen
WWWei Wang
Wei Wang
LCLiang‐Yi Chang
Liang‐Yi Chang
AKAndrew C. Kummel
Andrew C. Kummel

25 June 2007 in Applied Physics Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RYRichard D. Yang
Richard D. Yang
Thomas GredigThomas Gredig
Thomas Gredig
CCCorneliu N. Colesniuc
Corneliu N. Colesniuc
JPJeongwon Park
Jeongwon Park
ISIvan K. Schuller
Ivan K. Schuller
AKAndrew C. Kummel
Andrew C. Kummel
Ultrathin cobalt phthalocyanine transistors of 4 ML have been fabricated for chemical sensing. Compared to 50 ML devices, the ultrathin transistors show faster response times, higher base line stabilities, and sensitivity enhancements of 1.5–20 for the five analytes tested. The enhanced response for the ultrathin transistors provides insight into the device physics. The absorption of analytes changes the surface doping level and trap energies. The changes in surface trap energies perturb the charge transport properties of the ultrathin devices, thereby, making these devices more sensitive.

15 July 2010 in Journal of Applied Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WMWilhelm Melitz
Wilhelm Melitz
JSJian Shen
Jian Shen
SLSangyeob Lee
Sangyeob Lee
JLJoon Sung Lee
Joon Sung Lee
AKAndrew C. Kummel
Andrew C. Kummel
EYEdward T. Yu
Edward T. Yu
A comparison is made between the electronic structures determined in ultrahigh vacuum of three surfaces using scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) and Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM). STS and KPFM illustrates Fermi level pinning of clean InAs(001)-(4×2) and InGaAs(001)-(4×2) surfaces and near flat band conditions for InAs(110) cleaved surfaces. However, for InAs(001)-(4×2) and InGaAs(001)-(4×2), STS and KPFM data show very different positions for the surface Fermi level on identical samples; it is hypothesized that the difference is due to the Fermi level measured by KPFM being shifted by a static charge dipole to which STS is much less sensitive.

5 October 2023 in ACS Nano
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPChristopher Perez
Christopher Perez
AMAaron J. McLeod
Aaron J. McLeod
MCMichelle E. Chen
Michelle E. Chen
SYSu-In Yi
Su-In Yi
SVSam Vaziri
Sam Vaziri
KGKenneth E. Goodson
Kenneth E. Goodson