Prakash Nepal

Dr. Prakash Nepal

USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI 53726, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 March 2023 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NRNaveenkumar Rajendran
Naveenkumar Rajendran
TRTroy Runge
Troy Runge
RBRichard Bergman
Richard Bergman
Prakash NepalPrakash Nepal
Prakash Nepal
CHCarl Houtman
Carl Houtman

17 December 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Prakash NepalPrakash Nepal
Prakash Nepal
CJCraig Johnston
Craig Johnston
IGIndroneil Ganguly
Indroneil Ganguly
This study evaluated the effects on forest resources and forest product markets of three contrasting mass timber demand scenarios (Conservative, Optimistic, and Extreme), up to 2060, in twelve selected countries in Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. Analyses were carried out by utilizing the FOrest Resource Outlook Model, a partial market equilibrium model of the global forest sector. The findings suggest increases in global softwood lumber production of 8, 23, and 53 million m3 per year by 2060, under the Conservative, Optimistic, and Extreme scenarios, respectively, leading to world price increases of 2%, 7%, and 23%, respectively. This projected price increase is relative to the projected price in the reference scenario, altering prices, production, consumption, trade of forest products, timber harvest, forest growth, and forest stock in individual countries. An increase in softwood lumber prices due to increased mass timber demand would lead to the reduced consumption of softwood lumber for traditional end-use (e.g., light-frame construction), suggesting a likely strong market competition for softwood lumber between the mass timber and traditional construction industries. In contrast, the projected effect on global forest stock was relatively small based on the relatively fast projected biomass growth in stands assumed to be regenerated after harvest.

28 April 2023 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMSeyed Hashem Mousavi-Avval
Seyed Hashem Mousavi-Avval
KSKamalakanta Sahoo
Kamalakanta Sahoo
Prakash NepalPrakash Nepal
Prakash Nepal
TRTROY RUNGE
TROY RUNGE
RBRichard Bergman
Richard Bergman

21 January 2024 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Vaibhav KumarVaibhav Kumar
Vaibhav Kumar
MRMarco Lo Ricco
Marco Lo Ricco
RBRichard Bergman
Richard Bergman
Prakash NepalPrakash Nepal
Prakash Nepal
NPNeelam C. Poudyal
Neelam C. Poudyal

1 June 2019 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Prakash NepalPrakash Nepal
Prakash Nepal
JKJaana Korhonen
Jaana Korhonen
JPJeffrey Paul Prestemon
Jeffrey Paul Prestemon
Frederick CubbageFrederick Cubbage
Frederick Cubbage

20 March 2024 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Prakash NepalPrakash Nepal
Prakash Nepal
JPJeffrey Paul Prestemon
Jeffrey Paul Prestemon
IGIndroneil Ganguly
Indroneil Ganguly
Vaibhav KumarVaibhav Kumar
Vaibhav Kumar
RBRichard Bergman
Richard Bergman
NPNeelam C. Poudyal
Neelam C. Poudyal
Nonresidential and mid- to high-rise multifamily residential structures in the United States currently use little wood per unit floor area installed, because earlier building codes lacked provisions for structural wood use in those types of buildings. However, revisions to the International Building Code allow for increased wood use in the form of mass timber, as structural and fire safety concerns have been addressed through new science-based design standards and through newly specified construction materials and measures. This study used multiple models to describe alternative futures for new construction, mass timber adoption rates, and the associated carbon benefits in higher than three-story buildings in the United States. The use of mass timber, in place of traditional constructions (i.e., structures dominated by concrete and steel), in projected new higher than three-story buildings was shown to provide combined carbon benefits (i.e., global warming mitigation benefits), including avoided embodied carbon emissions due to the substitution of non-wood alternatives and additional biogenic carbon storage in mass timber materials, of between 9.9 and 16.5 million t CO2e/yr spanning 50 years, 2020 to 2070. These carbon benefits equate to 12% to 20% of the total U.S. harvested wood products carbon storage for 2020. Future research is needed to understand how greater mass timber adoption leads to changes in forest product markets, land use, and total forest sector carbon.