Marcin Andrzej Madziała

Dr. Marcin Andrzej Madziała

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 April 2017 in European Journal of Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMarcin Andrzej Madziała
Marcin Andrzej Madziała
JSJacek Smereka
Jacek Smereka
MDMarek Dabrowski
Marek Dabrowski
SLSteve Leung
Steve Leung
Kurt RuetzlerKurt Ruetzler
Kurt Ruetzler
Lukasz SzarpakLukasz Szarpak
Lukasz Szarpak
Emergency airway management in children is generally considered to be challenging, and endotracheal intubation requires a high level of personal skills and experience. Immobilization of the cervical spine is indicated in all patients with the risk of any cervical spine injury but significantly aggravates endotracheal intubation. The best airway device in this setting has not been established yet, although the use of videolaryngoscopes is generally promising. Seventy-five moderately experienced paramedics of the Emergency Medical Service of Poland performed endotracheal intubations in a pediatric manikin in three airway scenarios: (A) normal airway, (B) manual in-line cervical immobilization, and (C) cervical immobilization using a Patriot cervical extrication collar and using two airway techniques: (1) McGrath videolaryngoscope and (2) Macintosh blade in a randomized sequence. First-attempt intubation success rate, time to intubation, glottis visualization, and subjective ease of intubation were investigated in this study. Intubation of difficult airways, including manual in-line and cervical collar immobilization, using the McGrath was significantly faster, with a higher first-attempt intubation success rate, better glottic visualization, and ease of intubation, compared to Macintosh-guided intubation. In the normal airway, both airway techniques performed equal.

1 April 2017 in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PGPawel Gawlowski
Pawel Gawlowski
JSJacek Smereka
Jacek Smereka
MMMarcin Andrzej Madziała
Marcin Andrzej Madziała
BCBarak Cohen
Barak Cohen
Kurt RuetzlerKurt Ruetzler
Kurt Ruetzler
Lukasz SzarpakLukasz Szarpak
Lukasz Szarpak
Management of the airway of a trauma victim is considered challenging. Various approaches have been described to achieve airway control in this setup; many of them include video-assited viewing of the larynx during intubation. ETView Single Lumen (SL) is a novice single-use endotracheal tube equiped with a video camera and a light source at its distal tip. Its use was previously described in seeral clinical and training setups. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of the VivaSight SL compared with classic direct laryngoscopy performed with a Macintosh blade in a manikin-simulated trauma setup presenting various degrees of airway challenge when performed by inexperienced physicians. This was prospective, randomized, crossover, manikin trial. After short training on the ETView system, 67 novice paramedics attempted to perform oral intubation using both standard direct laryngoscopy (MAC group) and the VivaSight SL endotracheal tube (ETView group) in a randomized order on manikins in 3 increasingly more difficult scenarios (simple intubation, cervical spine manual stabilization, and with cervical collar in place). Overall success rate, time to intubation, number of intubation attempts, laryngeal view grade, dental compression, and overall participant satisfaction were monitored. Duration of intubation and number of attempts were significantly superior in the ETView group in the latter 2 more challenging scenarios. All other parameters showed superiority to the ETView group in all 3 scenarios. The VivaSight SL system performed better in a complex scenario of airway management of a trauma victim in need for cervical spine stabilization performed by novice caregivers compared to standard direct laryngoscopy and should be considered in this clinical setup.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJustyna Paleczny
Justyna Paleczny
MBMalwina Brożyna
Malwina Brożyna
RDRuth Dudek-Wicher
Ruth Dudek-Wicher
KDKarolina Dydak
Karolina Dydak
MOMonika Oleksy-Wawrzyniak
Monika Oleksy-Wawrzyniak
Adam JunkaAdam Junka
Adam Junka
The biofilm-associated infections of bones are life-threatening diseases, requiring application of dedicated antibiotics in order to counteract the tissue damage and spread of microorganisms. The in vitro analyses on biofilm formation and susceptibility to antibiotics are frequently carried out using methods that do not reflect conditions at the site of infection. To evaluate the influence of nutrient accessibility on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm development in vitro, a cohesive set of analyses in three different compositional media was performed. Next, the efficacy of four antibiotics used in bone infection treatment, including gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and vancomycin, against staphylococcal biofilm, was also assessed. The results show a significant reduction in the ability of biofilm to grow in a medium containing elements occurring in the serum, which also translated into the diversified changes in the efficacy of used antibiotics, compared to the setting in which conventional media were applied. The differences indicate the need for implementation of adequate in vitro models that closely mimic the infection site. The results of the present research may be considered an essential step toward the development of in vitro analyses aiming to accurately indicate the most suitable antibiotic to be applied against biofilm-related infections of bones.

1 September 2016 in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZTZenon Truszewski
Zenon Truszewski
LCLukasz Czyzewski
Lukasz Czyzewski
JSJacek Smereka
Jacek Smereka
PKPaweł Krajewski
Paweł Krajewski
MFMarcin Fudalej
Marcin Fudalej
Lukasz SzarpakLukasz Szarpak
Lukasz Szarpak

1 March 2017 in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PGPawel Gawlowski
Pawel Gawlowski
JSJacek Smereka
Jacek Smereka
MMMarcin Andrzej Madziała
Marcin Andrzej Madziała
Lukasz SzarpakLukasz Szarpak
Lukasz Szarpak
MFMichael Frass
Michael Frass
OROliver Robak
Oliver Robak

1 September 2018 in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Lukasz SzarpakLukasz Szarpak
Lukasz Szarpak
AMAgnieszka Madziala
Agnieszka Madziala
MCMichael Czekajlo
Michael Czekajlo
JSJacek Smereka
Jacek Smereka
Alexander KasererAlexander Kaserer
Alexander Kaserer
Kurt RuetzlerKurt Ruetzler
Kurt Ruetzler
Endotracheal intubation (ETI) can be challenging, especially in life-threatening situations such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Videolaryngoscopes aim to ease ETI, but effort is still widely discussed. This study intended to investigate 2 different airway devices regarding the success rate of ETI during ongoing chest compressions. This randomized, cross-over, multi-center manikin trial included 85 experienced paramedics actively working in the emergency medicine service. After a standardized training session, all paramedics underwent 3 airway scenarios using both, direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade and videolaryngoscope (the UEScope): normal airway without chest compressions, normal airway with uninterrupted chest compressions, and difficult airway with uninterrupted chest compressions. The primary outcome was successful ETI, defined as successful placement of the endotracheal tube within the manikin's trachea. Secondary outcomes were number of intubation attempts, time to successful ETI, time to best glottis view, best percent of glottic opening, best glottic view score (Cormack and Lehane), occurrence of dental trauma, ease of use, and willing to reuse in real-life situations. The UEScope provided a better glottis visualization, and higher first pass intubation success rate compared to direct laryngoscopy in all 3 scenarios. The overall intubation success was higher, and the intubation time was shorter with the UEScope in scenario B and scenario C, but was comparable in scenario A. Dental compression occurred less often using the UEScope and paramedics rated intubation using the UEScope easier compared to direct laryngoscopy in all 3 airway scenarios. In simulated CPR scenarios, intubation with the UEScope resulted in a better glottis visualization, a higher intubation success, and a shorter intubation time compared to Macintosh laryngoscope (MAC). Moreover, in situations where the airway is difficult for ETI especially by the paramedic, the UEScope would be a better choice than the MAC. Further studies are needed to confirm these results in real-life patients.