Thomas Brown

Mr. Thomas Brown


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 February 2022 in Nuclear Fusion
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JMJ.E. Menard
J.E. Menard
BGB.A. Grierson
B.A. Grierson
TBThomas Brown
Thomas Brown
CRChirag Rana
Chirag Rana
YZYuhu Zhai
Yuhu Zhai
PSPhilip B Snyder
Philip B Snyder
Recent U.S. fusion development strategy reports all recommend that the U.S. should pursue innovative science and technology to enable construction of a fusion pilot plant (FPP) that produces net electricity from fusion at low capital cost. Compact tokamaks have been proposed as a means of potentially reducing the capital cost of a FPP. However, compact steady-state tokamak FPPs face the challenge of integrating a high fraction of self-driven current with high core confinement, plasma pressure, and high divertor parallel heat flux. This integration is sufficiently challenging that a dedicated sustained-high-power-density (SHPD) tokamak facility is proposed by the U.S. community as the optimal way to close this integration gap. Performance projections for the steady-state tokamak FPP regime are presented and a preliminary SHPD device with substantial flexibility in lower aspect ratio (A = 2–2.5), shaping, and divertor configuration to narrow gaps to an FPP is described.

1 October 2015 in Fusion Engineering and Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKeeman Kim
Keeman Kim
SOSangjun Oh
Sangjun Oh
JPJong Sung Park
Jong Sung Park
CLChul-Hee Lee
Chul-Hee Lee
KIKihak Im
Kihak Im
YZYuhu Zhai
Yuhu Zhai

1 December 2018 in Fusion Engineering and Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAndrei Khodak
Andrei Khodak
PTPeter Titus
Peter Titus
TBThomas Brown
Thomas Brown
JKJonathan Klabacha
Jonathan Klabacha

13 April 2022 in IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YZY. Zhai
Y. Zhai
TBThomas Brown
Thomas Brown
JMJ. E. Menard
J. E. Menard
DLD. C. van der Laan
D. C. van der Laan
JWJ. D. Weiss
J. D. Weiss
ZJZ. Johnson
Z. Johnson
Significant progress has been made recently in the US fusion community to develop a strategic plan to enable engineering design and construction of a fusion pilot plant (FPP). Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) is working on developing high current density HTS conductors for next fusion experiments. Partnering with the US industry, we are evaluating feasibility and affordability of Conductor on Round Core (CORC ${}^\circledR$ ) developed by Advanced Conductor Technologies (ACT) for the next compact fusion tokamak facility. High current density achieved by a CORC ${}^\circledR$ cable based on a four-layer model coil recently tested at National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (NHMFL) motivated its consideration for low cost, reduced size fusion magnet application. This is of interest to PPPL because of its scalability to tokamak central solenoid (CS) coils in terms of required flux swings for plasma startup operations. Partnering with ACT, we designed and built a two-layer model coil solenoid directly wound with CORC to demonstrate its applicability for compact solenoids such as that used in the national spherical torus experiment (NSTX), NSTX-upgrade (NSTX-U) and the US sustained high-power density test facility (SHPD). The ∼160 mm diameter solenoid wound by a two-layer CORC is being tested in early 2022 under electromagnetic cyclic loading at NHMFL in a unique 160 mm bore, 14 T background field magnet facility.

11 August 2016 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LELaila El-Guebaly
Laila El-Guebaly
ARArthur Rowcliffe
Arthur Rowcliffe
JMJonathan Menard
Jonathan Menard
TBThomas Brown
Thomas Brown
The qualification and validation of nuclear technologies are daunting tasks for fusion demonstration (DEMO) and power plants. This is particularly true for advanced designs that involve harsh radiation environment with 14 MeV neutrons and high-temperature operating regimes. This paper outlines the unique qualification and validation processes developed in the U.S., offering the only access to the complete fusion environment, focusing on the most prominent U.S. blanket concept (the dual cooled PbLi (DCLL)) along with testing new generations of structural and functional materials in dedicated test modules. The venue for such activities is the proposed Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF), which is viewed as an essential element of the U.S. fusion roadmap. A staged blanket testing strategy has been developed to test and enhance the DCLL blanket performance during each phase of FNSF D-T operation. A materials testing module (MTM) is critically important to include in the FNSF as well to test a broad range of specimens of future, more advanced generations of materials in a relevant fusion environment. The most important attributes for MTM are the relevant He/dpa ratio (10–15) and the much larger specimen volumes compared to the 10–500 mL range available in the International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility (IFMIF) and European DEMO-Oriented Neutron Source (DONES).

25 September 2025 in Fusion Engineering and Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TBThomas Brown
Thomas Brown
JMJ.E. Menard
J.E. Menard
JBJ.W. Berkery
J.W. Berkery
ABA. Brooks
A. Brooks
ACA.E. Costley
A.E. Costley
MSM. Smith
M. Smith