The application of drip irrigation has been paid more and more attention, but there was lack of systematic comparative analysis between drip irrigation and conventional border irrigation method for maize, currently. A 7-year field study from 2015 to 2021 evaluated the effects of drip irrigation (DI, 540 mm) or conventional border irrigation method (BI, 720 mm) on maize growth, water use efficiency (WUE) as well as profitability. The results showed the plant height, leaf area index, yield, WUE and economic benefit of maize with DI had significantly higher than BI. The dry matter translocation, the dry matter transfer efficiency and contribution of dry matter translocation to grain with DI showed significant increase of 27.44%, 13.97% and 7.85% compared to BI, respectively. In comparison to conventional border irrigation, the yield of drip irrigation increased by 14.39%, as well as WUE and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) increased by 53.77% and 57.89%. The net return and economic benefit of drip irrigation was 1998.87 and 756.58 USD$ hm⁻¹ higher than that of BI. Drip irrigation increased net return and benefit/cost ratio by 60.90% and 22.88% compared with BI. These results demonstrate that the drip irrigation can effectively improve the growth, yield, WUE and economic benefit of maize in northwest China. Therefore, drip irrigation can be used for maize cultivation to increase crop yield and WUE in northwest China, which has cut down on irrigation water about 180 mm.

Drip irrigation systems are becoming more and more mature, and are presently extensively applied to increase crop yield and water use efficiency. In order to investigate the effects of irrigation quota on maize growth, the grain yield, and the water use efficiency (WUE), a field experiment with four irrigation quotas (T1 420 mm, T2 480 mm, T3 540 mm, and T4 600 mm) was conducted from 2013 to 2021 in Xinjiang, China. The results showed significant changes in maize growth, yield, and WUE in response to different irrigation quotas. The plant height, leaf area index, soil and plant analyzer development (SPAD), dry matter accumulation, yield, and harvest index of maize at different irrigation quotas all showed a ‘single peak curve’, and its change was closely related to the irrigation level. The growth index, dry matter accumulation, yield, and irrigation water use efficiency with T3 were the highest. The dry matter transfer efficiency, contribution of dry matter translocation to grain, and the harvest index with T3 showed a significant increase of 13.86%, 26.06%, 29.93%, and 7.62% compared to T1, respectively. In comparison to T1, T2, and T4, the yield of T3 increased by 32.17%, 13.54%, and 11.27%, respectively, and the WUE increased by 16.56%, 6.49%, and 23.70%, respectively. The significant correlations established between the maize yield and irrigation quotas could be simulated by a Kuznets-style relation. The maize yield was negatively correlated with irrigation quotas. When the irrigation quota (x) was 539.12 mm, the maize yield (y) was 16043.92 kg·hm⁻². These results demonstrate that the optimized irrigation quota (540 mm) can effectively improve the growth, yield, and WUE of drip irrigation maize in northwest China. Meanwhile, it can provide a theoretical reference and data support for the optimal amount of irrigation for drip irrigation maize in Xinjiang China.

Potassium (K) is crucial for global maize (Zea mays L.) production, yet the issue of “high K fertilizer input but low utilization efficiency” in K-rich soils of Xinjiang remains underexplored. A three-year field experiment (2020, 2021, 2024) in Xinjiang evaluated the effects of reduced K application on maize growth, grain yield (GY), and K-use efficiency. Five treatments were tested: K100 (136.0 kg K₂O·ha⁻¹), K60 (83.5 kg K₂O·ha⁻¹), K40 (55.6 kg K₂O·ha⁻¹), K0 (no K), and CK (no fertilizer). The research shows that K60 significantly outperforms K100 in terms of physiological parameters (plant height + 2.7–34.7%, leaf area index (LAI) + 6.3–26.8%, dry matter + 22.0–28.8%); GY and thousand kernel weight (TKW) improved by 6.9–15.1% and 9.3–30.3%, respectively. The potassium fertilizer productivity (PFP_K) and potassium fertilizer agronomic efficiency (AE_K) increased by 78–112.3% and 176.4–2085% compared to the K100. During the three-year period, the maximum net income of K60 reached 28,206 CNY·ha⁻¹, which was 18.9–20.7% higher than that of K100. Regression analysis identified an optimal K rate of 82.2–85 kg·ha⁻¹ for maximum yield. Least squares structural equation mode (PLS-SEM) and correlation analyses revealed that moderate K reduction enhanced vegetative growth and optimized yield structure, indirectly boosting yield, thereby directly driving net income. Thus, reducing K input can achieve “lower input with higher efficiency”, offering a practical basis for optimizing K management in arid-region maize systems.

In order to determine the effects of different water-saving irrigation techniques on physiological growth, farmland microclimate, and yield of cotton (Gossypium Spp.), a two-year field experiment was carried out in an oasis area of Northwest China, and three irrigation methods were tested, including on-film irrigation (T1), under-film drip irrigation (T2), and automatic irrigation (T3). The results showed that the relative humidity, plant height, leaf area, stem thick, and photosynthetic index with the T3 treatment were significantly higher than those with T2 and T1. The air and soil temperature with T3 (except seedling stage) were considerably lower than those with T2 and T1. According to the fitting and statistical analysis of each index and yield, except for air and soil temperature, the other indices were positively correlated with yield. Based on the analysis of each index, the T3 treatment had the most significant regulatory effect on cotton’s physiological growth and farmland microclimate. Compared with T1, the irrigation amounts of T2 and T3 decreased by 16.43% and 25.90%, but the yield increased by 38.96% and 46.28%, respectively. The automatic irrigation strategy showed significant advantages in water saving and yield increase, which could provide some reference for cotton drip irrigation in similarly arid areas.

Water conservation is critical for global maize production, particularly in arid regions where water scarcity, exacerbated by climate change, threatens conventional irrigation sustainability. Optimizing irrigation strategies to reconcile water productivity and yield remains a key scientific challenge in water-limited agriculture. This four-year study (2018–2021) evaluated integrated irrigation management that combined frequency and volume adjustments. A field experiment compared three strategies: high-frequency limited irrigation (HL: 2400 m³·hm⁻²), low-frequency conventional irrigation (LC: 2400 m³·hm⁻²), and high-frequency conventional irrigation (HC: 4800 m³·hm⁻²). The four-year mean yield showed that HL (10,793.78 kg·hm⁻²) had a non-significant 18.2% numerical advantage over LC (9129.11 kg·hm⁻², p > 0.05). The WUE for HL reached 3.63 kg·m⁻³, representing an 18.6% numerical increase compared to LC (3.06 kg·m⁻³; p > 0.05). Physiological parameters (plant height + 2.6%, leaf area + 9.9%, SPAD + 1.5%) showed marginal improvements in HL, yet lacked both statistical significance (p > 0.05) and strong yield correlation. Multi-year analyses confirmed no statistically distinguishable differences between strategies (p > 0.05), demonstrating that irrigation frequency adjustments alone cannot reliably enhance drought resilience. These findings caution against advocating for HL as a superior practice, given the statistical equivalence between HL and LC despite water savings, and the non-significant yield gap between HL and HC. Future research must establish causality through models integrating real-time soil–crop–climate feedback prior to recommending altered irrigation regimes.