Tiziana Polichetti

Dr. Tiziana Polichetti

Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Portici (Naples), Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 November 2020 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Brigida AlfanoBrigida Alfano
Brigida Alfano
LBLuigi Barretta
Luigi Barretta
AGAntonio Del Giudice
Antonio Del Giudice
De Vito SaverioDe Vito Saverio
De Vito Saverio
GFGirolamo Di francia
Girolamo Di francia
TPTiziana Polichetti
Tiziana Polichetti
The concerns related to particulate matter’s health effects alongside the increasing demands from citizens for more participatory, timely, and diffused air quality monitoring actions have resulted in increasing scientific and industrial interest in low-cost particulate matter sensors (LCPMS). In the present paper, we discuss 50 LCPMS models, a number that is particularly meaningful when compared to the much smaller number of models described in other recent reviews on the same topic. After illustrating the basic definitions related to particulate matter (PM) and its measurements according to international regulations, the device’s operating principle is presented, focusing on a discussion of the several characterization methodologies proposed by various research groups, both in the lab and in the field, along with their possible limitations. We present an extensive review of the LCPMS currently available on the market, their electronic characteristics, and their applications in published literature and from specific tests. Most of the reviewed LCPMS can accurately monitor PM changes in the environment and exhibit good performances with accuracy that, in some conditions, can reach R2 values up to 0.99. However, such results strongly depend on whether the device is calibrated or not (using a reference method) in the operative environment; if not, R2 values lower than 0.5 are observed.

5 April 2017 in Nanoscale
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FRFiliberto Ricciardella
Filiberto Ricciardella
Delft University VollebregtDelft University Vollebregt
Delft University Vollebregt
TPTiziana Polichetti
Tiziana Polichetti
MMMario Miscuglio
Mario Miscuglio
Brigida AlfanoBrigida Alfano
Brigida Alfano
PSPasqualina M. Sarro
Pasqualina M. Sarro
The crystal structure of graphene flakes is expected to significantly affect their sensing properties. Here we report an experimental investigation on the crystalline structure of graphene aimed at exploring the effects on the gas sensing properties. The morphology of graphene, prepared via Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD), Liquid Phase Exfoliation (LPE) and Mechanical Exfoliation (ME), is inspected through Raman spectroscopy, Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). CVD and LPE-graphene structures are found to be more defective with respect to ME-graphene. The defects are due to the jagged morphology of the films rather than originating from intrinsic disorder. The flatness of ME-graphene flakes, instead, explains the absence of defects. Chemiresistors based on the three different graphene preparation methods are subsequently exposed to NO2 in the concentration range 0.1–1.5 ppm (parts per million). The device performance is demonstrated to be strongly and unambiguously affected by the material structure: the less defective the material is, the higher the response rate is. In terms of signal variation, at 1.5 ppm, for instance, ME-graphene shows the highest value (5%) among the three materials. This study, comparing simultaneously graphene and sensors prepared via different routes, provides the first experimental evidence of the role played by the graphene level of defectiveness in the interaction with analytes. Moreover, these findings can pave the path for tailoring the sensor behavior as a function of graphene morphology.

29 October 2015 in physica status solidi (c)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RCRosa Chierchia
Rosa Chierchia
FPF. Pigna
F. Pigna
MVM. Valentini
M. Valentini
CMClaudia Malerba
Claudia Malerba
ESE. Salza
E. Salza
AMA. Mittiga
A. Mittiga

1 October 1999 in Thin Solid Films
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAA. Antonaia
A. Antonaia
TPTiziana Polichetti
Tiziana Polichetti
MAM.L. Addonizio
M.L. Addonizio
SAS. Aprea
S. Aprea
CMC. Minarini
C. Minarini
ARA. Rubino
A. Rubino

26 June 2007 in Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
De Vito SaverioDe Vito Saverio
De Vito Saverio
ACAnna Castaldo
Anna Castaldo
FLFausta Loffredo
Fausta Loffredo
ettore masseraettore massera
ettore massera
TPTiziana Polichetti
Tiziana Polichetti
GFGirolamo Di francia
Girolamo Di francia

1 November 2012 in Thin Solid Films
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLL. Lancellotti
L. Lancellotti
TPTiziana Polichetti
Tiziana Polichetti
FRFiliberto Ricciardella
Filiberto Ricciardella
OTO. Tari
O. Tari
SGS. Gnanapragasam
S. Gnanapragasam
GFG. Di Francia
G. Di Francia