Urs Hafeli

Prof. Urs Hafeli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 October 2017 in Journal of Nanobiotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YSYael Slavin
Yael Slavin
JAJason Asnis
Jason Asnis
UHUrs Hafeli
Urs Hafeli
Horacio BachHoracio Bach
Horacio Bach
As the field of nanomedicine emerges, there is a lag in research surrounding the topic of nanoparticle (NP) toxicity, particularly concerned with mechanisms of action. The continuous emergence of bacterial resistance has challenged the research community to develop novel antibiotic agents. Metal NPs are among the most promising of these because show strong antibacterial activity. This review summarizes and discusses proposed mechanisms of antibacterial action of different metal NPs. These mechanisms of bacterial killing include the production of reactive oxygen species, cation release, biomolecule damages, ATP depletion, and membrane interaction. Finally, a comprehensive analysis of the effects of NPs on the regulation of genes and proteins (transcriptomic and proteomic) profiles is discussed.

1 August 2011 in Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSophie Laurent
Sophie Laurent
SDSilvio Dutz
Silvio Dutz
UHUrs Hafeli
Urs Hafeli
Morteza MahmoudiMorteza Mahmoudi
Morteza Mahmoudi

1 January 2010 in Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Morteza MahmoudiMorteza Mahmoudi
Morteza Mahmoudi
َSَAbdolreza Simchi
َAbdolreza Simchi
MIMohammad Imani
Mohammad Imani
MSMohammad ali Shokrgozar
Mohammad ali Shokrgozar
AMAbbas S. Milani
Abbas S. Milani
PSPieter Stroeve
Pieter Stroeve

15 May 2009 in Molecular Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
UHUrs Hafeli
Urs Hafeli
JRJudy S. Riffle
Judy S. Riffle
LHLinda Harris-Shekhawat
Linda Harris-Shekhawat
ACAnita Carmichael-Baranauskas
Anita Carmichael-Baranauskas
FMFramin Mark
Framin Mark
DBDavid Bardenstein
David Bardenstein

25 August 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SRS. A. Ranamukhaarachchi
S. A. Ranamukhaarachchi
SLS. Lehnert
S. Lehnert
SRS. L. Ranamukhaarachchi
S. L. Ranamukhaarachchi
LSL. Sprenger
L. Sprenger
TST. Schneider
T. Schneider
BBBoris Boris
Boris Boris
Collecting human skin samples for medical research, including developing microneedle-based medical devices, is challenging and time-consuming. Researchers rely on human skin substitutes and skin preservation techniques, such as freezing, to overcome the lack of skin availability. Porcine skin is considered the best substitute to human skin, but their mechanical resemblance has not been fully validated. We provide a direct mechanical comparison between human and porcine skin samples using a conventional mechano-analytical technique (microindentation) and a medical application (microneedle insertion), at 35% and 100% relative humidity. Human and porcine skin samples were tested immediately after surgical excision from subjects, and after one freeze-thaw cycle at −80 °C to assess the impact of freezing on their mechanical properties. The mechanical properties of fresh human and porcine skin (especially of the stratum corneum) were found to be different for bulk measurements using microindentation; and both types of skin were mechanically affected by freezing. Localized in-plane mechanical properties of skin during microneedle insertion appeared to be more comparable between human and porcine skin samples than their bulk out-of-plane mechanical properties. The results from this study serve as a reference for future mechanical tests conducted with frozen human skin and/or porcine skin as a human skin substitute.

10 January 2012 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSophie Laurent
Sophie Laurent
Carmen BurteaCarmen Burtea
Carmen Burtea
CTCoralie Thirifays
Coralie Thirifays
UHUrs Hafeli
Urs Hafeli
Morteza MahmoudiMorteza Mahmoudi
Morteza Mahmoudi
Until now, the results of nanotoxicology research have shown that the interactions between nanoparticles (NPs) and cells are remarkably complex. In order to get a deep understanding of the NP-cell interactions, scientists have focused on the physicochemical effects. However, there are still considerable debates about the regulation of nanomaterials and the reported results are usually in contradictions. Here, we are going to introduce the potential key reasons for these conflicts. In this case, modification of conventional in vitro toxicity assays, is one of the crucial ignored matter in nanotoxicological sciences. More specifically, the conventional methods neglect important factors such as the sedimentation of NPs and absorption of proteins and other essential biomolecules onto the surface of NPs. Another ignored matter in nanotoxicological sciences is the effect of cell “vision” (i.e., cell type). In order to show the effects of these ignored subjects, we probed the effect of superparamagnetic iron oxide NPs (SPIONs), with various surface chemistries, on various cell lines. We found thatthe modification of conventional toxicity assays and the consideration of the “cell vision” concept are crucial matters to obtain reliable, and reproducible nanotoxicology data. These new concepts offer a suitable way to obtain a deep understanding on the cell-NP interactions. In addition, by consideration of these ignored factors, the conflict of future toxicological reports would be significantly decreased.