Riccardo Campo

Dr. Riccardo Campo

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Ambientale - DICEA, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50139 Firenze, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2020 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Riccardo CampoRiccardo Campo
Riccardo Campo
SSSara Sguanci
Sara Sguanci
SCSimone Caffaz
Simone Caffaz
LMLorenzo Mazzoli
Lorenzo Mazzoli
MRMatteo Ramazzotti
Matteo Ramazzotti
TLTommaso Lotti
Tommaso Lotti

1 January 2016 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSanto Fabio Corsino
Santo Fabio Corsino
Riccardo CampoRiccardo Campo
Riccardo Campo
Gaetano Di BellaGaetano Di Bella
Gaetano Di Bella
MTM. Torregrossa
M. Torregrossa
GVG. Viviani
G. Viviani

1 April 2018 in Separation and Purification Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Riccardo CampoRiccardo Campo
Riccardo Campo
SCSanto Fabio Corsino
Santo Fabio Corsino
MTMichele Torregrossa
Michele Torregrossa
Gaetano Di BellaGaetano Di Bella
Gaetano Di Bella

1 April 2020 in Journal of Water Process Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBP. Bruno
P. Bruno
Riccardo CampoRiccardo Campo
Riccardo Campo
MGM.G. Giustra
M.G. Giustra
MMM. De Marchis
M. De Marchis
GBG. Di Bella
G. Di Bella

1 February 2017 in Biochemical Engineering Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Riccardo CampoRiccardo Campo
Riccardo Campo
MCMarco Capodici
Marco Capodici
GBGaetano Di Bella
Gaetano Di Bella
MTMichele Torregrossa
Michele Torregrossa

1 July 2019 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PCP. Carrera
P. Carrera
Riccardo CampoRiccardo Campo
Riccardo Campo
RMR. Méndez
R. Méndez
Gaetano Di BellaGaetano Di Bella
Gaetano Di Bella
José Luis CamposJosé Luis Campos
José Luis Campos
Angeles Val del RioAngeles Val del Rio
Angeles Val del Rio
The development and stability of aerobic granular sludge (AGS) was studied in two Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBRs) treating fish canning wastewater. R1 cycle comprised a fully aerobic reaction phase, while R2 cycle included a plug-flow anaerobic feeding/reaction followed by an aerobic reaction phase. The performance of the AGS reactors was compared treating the same effluents with variable salt concentrations (4.97-13.45 g NaCl/L) and organic loading rates (OLR, 1.80-6.65 kg CODs/(m3·d)). Granulation process was faster in R2 (day 34) than in R1 (day 90), however the granular biomass formed in the fully aerobic configuration was more stable to the variable feeding composition. Thus, in R1 solid retention times (SRT), up to 15.2 days, longer than in R2, up to 5.8 days, were achieved. These long SRTs values helped the retention of nitrifying organisms and provoked the increase of the nitrogen removal efficiency to 80% in R1 while it was approximately of 40% in R2. However, the presence of an anaerobic feeding/reaction phase increased the organic matter removal efficiency in R2 (80-90%) which was higher than in R1 with a fully aerobic phase (75-85%). Furthermore, in R2 glycogen-accumulating organisms (GAOs) dominated inside the granules instead of phosphorous-accumulating organisms (PAOs), suggesting that GAOs resist better the stressful conditions of a variable and high-saline influent. In terms of AGS properties an anaerobic feeding/reaction phase is not beneficial, however it enables the production of a better quality effluent.