Zhongyang Li

Prof. Dr. Zhongyang Li

Institute of Farmland Irrigation, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453002, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLina Lin
Lina Lin
Zhongyang LiZhongyang Li
Zhongyang Li
XLXuewei Liu
Xuewei Liu
WQWeiwen Qiu
Weiwen Qiu
ZSZhengguo Song
Zhengguo Song

1 September 2018 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ECEr-Ping Cui
Er-Ping Cui
FGFeng Gao
Feng Gao
Yuan LiuYuan Liu
Yuan Liu
XFXiang-Yang Fan
Xiang-Yang Fan
Zhongyang LiZhongyang Li
Zhongyang Li
ANAndrew L. Neal
Andrew L. Neal

1 May 2010 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Zhongyang LiZhongyang Li
Zhongyang Li
STShirong Tang
Shirong Tang
XDXiaofang Deng
Xiaofang Deng
RWRuigang Wang
Ruigang Wang
ZSZhengguo Song
Zhengguo Song

13 September 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Zhenjie DUZhenjie DU
Zhenjie DU
YXYatao Xiao
Yatao Xiao
Xuebin QiXuebin Qi
Xuebin Qi
Yuan LiuYuan Liu
Yuan Liu
XFXiangyang Fan
Xiangyang Fan
Zhongyang LiZhongyang Li
Zhongyang Li
Biochar and biogas slurry have been proved to improve the quality of some soil types, but the long-term effects on fluvo-aquic soil are not fully understood. This study aimed to compare the continuity effects of peanut-shell biochar and biogas slurry on the physicochemical properties, microbial population size, and enzyme activities of fluvo-aquic soil. We conducted a four-year field experiment of winter wheat-summer maize rotation in the North China Plain. Along with equal nitrogen inputs, three treatments were applied—conventional fertilizers, peanut-shell biochar, and hoggery biogas slurry—after which various soil quality indicators were compared. Compared with those of control, both biochar and biogas slurry increased the soil total nitrogen and organic matter content, and improved soil aggregation, microbial biomass, and actinomycetes. Biogas slurry decreased soil pH and improved urease and protease activities. With biochar and biogas slurry treatments, wheat yield increased by 8.46% and 23.47%, and maize yield by 18% and 15.46%, respectively. Biogas slurry increased the content of crude protein and starch in the grains. Both biogas slurry and peanut-shell biochar improved fluvo-aquic soil nutrient content, water-stable macroaggregates, and microbial population, which might be related to their high nutrient content, large specific surface area, adsorption capacity, and functional groups. Biogas slurry generally exhibited stronger effects than biochar probably because of its richness in nutrients and bioactive substances.

1 March 2017 in Journal of Integrative Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WGWei Guo
Wei Guo
MAMathias N Andersen
Mathias N Andersen
XQXue-Bin Qi
Xue-Bin Qi
PLPing Li
Ping Li
Zhongyang LiZhongyang Li
Zhongyang Li
YZYuan Zhou
Yuan Zhou

1 November 2021 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alin SongAlin Song
Alin Song
ZLZimin Li
Zimin Li
EWEnzhao Wang
Enzhao Wang
Duanyang XuDuanyang Xu
Duanyang Xu
SWSai Wang
Sai Wang
FFfenliang fan
fenliang fan