Background: Biofilm-associated infections frequently span multiple body sites and represent a significant clinical challenge, often requiring a multidisciplinary approach involving surgery and antimicrobial therapy. These infections are commonly healthcare-associated and frequently related to internal or external medical devices. The formation of biofilms complicates treatment, as they create environments that are difficult for most antimicrobial agents to penetrate. Fluoroquinolones play a critical role in the eradication of biofilm-related infections. Numerous studies have investigated the synergistic potential of combining fluoroquinolones with other chemical agents to augment their efficacy while minimizing potential toxicity. Comparative research suggests that the antibiofilm activity of fluoroquinolones is superior to that of beta-lactams and glycopeptides. However, their activity remains less effective than that of minocycline and fosfomycin. Noteworthy combinations include fluoroquinolones with fosfomycin and aminoglycosides for enhanced activity against Gram-negative organisms and fluoroquinolones with minocycline and rifampin for more effective treatment of Gram-positive infections. Despite the limitations of fluoroquinolones due to the intrinsic characteristics of this antibiotic, they remain fundamental in this setting thanks to their bioavailability and synergisms with other drugs. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using online databases (PubMed/MEDLINE/Google Scholar) and books written by experts in microbiology and infectious diseases to identify relevant studies on fluoroquinolones and biofilm. Results: This review critically assesses the role of fluoroquinolones in managing biofilm-associated infections in various clinical settings while also exploring the potential benefits of combination therapy with these antibiotics. Conclusions: The literature predominantly consists of in vitro studies, with limited in vivo investigations. Although real world data are scarce, they are in accordance with fluoroquinolones’ effectiveness in managing early biofilm-associated infections. Also, future perspectives of newer treatment options to be placed alongside fluoroquinolones are discussed. This review underscores the role of fluoroquinolones in the setting of biofilm-associated infections, providing a comprehensive guide for physicians regarding the best use of this class of antibiotics while highlighting the existing critical issues.

After 40 years of its appearance, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection remains a leading public health challenge worldwide. Since the introduction of antiretroviral treatment (ART), HIV infection has become a chronic condition, and people living with HIV could have life expectancies close to those of the general population. People with HIV often have an increased risk of infection or experience more severe morbidity following exposure to vaccine-preventable diseases. Nowadays, several vaccines are available against bacteria and viruses. However, national and international vaccination guidelines for people with HIV are heterogeneous, and not every vaccine is included. For these reasons, we aimed to perform a narrative review about the vaccinations available for adults living with HIV, reporting the most updated studies performed for each vaccine among this population. We performed a comprehensive literature search through electronic databases (Pubmed—MEDLINE and Embase) and search engines (Google Scholar). We included English peer-reviewed publications (articles and reviews) on HIV and vaccination. Despite widespread use and guideline recommendations, few vaccine trials have been conducted in people with HIV. In addition, not all vaccines are recommended for people with HIV, especially for those with low CD4 cells count. Clinicians should carefully collect the history of vaccinations and patients’ acceptance and preferences and regularly check the presence of antibodies for vaccine-preventable pathogens.

Since the start of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, several treatments have been proposed to prevent the progression of the disease. Currently, three antiviral (molnupiravir, nirmaltrevir/r, remdesivir) and two monoclonal antibodies (casirivimab/imdevimab and sotrovimab) are available in Italy. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the presence of risk factors associated with disease progression. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, including all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 evaluated between 01/01/2022 ad 10/05/2022 by our Unit of Infectious Diseases in Sassari. We defined disease progression as the necessity of starting O2 therapy. According to AIFA (Italian Medicines Agency) indications, preventive treatment was prescribed in patients with recent symptoms onset (≤five days), no need for oxygen supplementation, and risk factors for disease progression. Subgroup differences in quantitative variables were evaluated using Student’s t-test. Pearson chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were used to assess differences for qualitative variables. Multivariate logistic regression modelling was performed to determine factors associated with progression. A two-tailed p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with STATA version 17 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). We included 1145 people with SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, of which 336 (29.3%) developed severe disease with oxygen supplementation. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, age, dementia, haematologic tumors, heart failure, dyspnoea or fever at first evaluation, having ground glass opacities or consolidation at the first CT scan, and bacteria coinfection were associated with an increased risk of disease progression. Vaccination (at least two doses) and early treatment with antiviral or monoclonal antibodies were associated with a lower risk of disease progression. In conclusion, our study showed that vaccination and early treatment with antiviral and/or monoclonal antibodies significantly reduce the risk of disease progression.

Non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NFGNB) are a heterogeneous group of opportunistic pathogens increasingly associated with healthcare-associated infections. While Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are well known, rarer species such as Burkholderia cepacia complex, Achromobacter spp., Chryseobacterium spp., Elizabethkingia spp., Ralstonia spp., and others pose emerging therapeutic challenges. Their intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms limit effective treatment options, making targeted therapy essential. Objectives: This narrative review summarizes the current understanding of rare and unusual NFGNB, their clinical significance, resistance profiles, and evidence-based therapeutic strategies. Methods: A literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies on the epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance, and treatment approaches to rare NFGNB. Results: Rare NFGNB exhibits diverse resistance mechanisms, including β-lactamase production, efflux pumps, and porin modifications. Treatment selection depends on species-specific susceptibility patterns, but some cornerstones can be individuated. Novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors and combination therapy approaches are being explored for multidrug-resistant isolates. However, clinical data remain limited. Conclusions: The increasing incidence of rare NFGNB requires heightened awareness and a tailored therapeutic approach. Given the paucity of clinical guidelines, antimicrobial stewardship and susceptibility-guided treatment are crucial in optimizing patient outcomes.

Cryptic Aspergillus species are increasingly recognized as pathogens involved in human disease. They are ubiquitarian fungi with high tenacity in their environment and can express various resistance mechanisms, often due to exposure to antifungal agents employed in agriculture and farming. The identification of such species is increasing thanks to molecular techniques, and a better description of this type of pathogen is granted. Nevertheless, the number of species and their importance in the clinical setting still need to be well studied. Furthermore, their cross-sectional involvement in animal disease, plants, and human activities requires a multidisciplinary approach involving experts from various fields. This comprehensive review aims to provide a sharp vision of the cryptic Aspergillus species, from the importance of correct identification to the better management of the infections caused by these pathogens. The review also accentuates the importance of the One Health approach for this kind of microorganism, given the interconnection between environmental exposure and aspergillosis, embracing transversely the multidisciplinary process for managing the cryptic Aspergillus species. The paper advocates the need for improving knowledge in this little-known species, given the burden of economic and health implications related to the diffusion of these bugs.

The proliferation of multidrug-resistant (MDR) ESKAPE pathogens—Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp.—constitutes a critical global health crisis, rendering conventional antibiotics increasingly ineffective. This comprehensive review evaluates the re-emerging potential of bacteriophage therapy as a personalized treatment for infections caused by these organisms. Phages, being viruses that specifically infect and lyse bacteria, offer significant advantages, including high specificity that spares host microbiota, self-replication at the infection site, and potent activity against biofilms. This paper synthesizes current preclinical and clinical evidence, including compassionate-use cases, for phage therapy against each of the ESKAPE pathogens. While case reports and small studies demonstrate considerable success, particularly in salvage therapy for otherwise untreatable infections, significant challenges remain. These include the narrow host range of phages, the potential for bacterial resistance, unpredictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, and a complex, non-harmonized regulatory landscape. The review highlights that phage–antibiotic synergy and the use of phage cocktails are promising strategies to overcome some of these limitations. Future progress in phage therapy will depend on standardized manufacturing, robust clinical trials to establish dosing and efficacy, and the development of adaptive regulatory pathways. Phage therapy is positioned not as a replacement for antibiotics but as a vital adjunctive tool in the armamentarium against MDR infections, heralding a move towards a more personalized approach to infectious disease management.