Prasanta Kumar Choudhury

Dr. Prasanta Kumar Choudhury

Dairy Technology, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Bhubaneswar, India
orcid
Associate Professor and Head, Dairy Technology, CUTM, Odisha

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2015 in International Journal of Food Properties
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DMDebapriya Mohanty
Debapriya Mohanty
RJRajashree Jena
Rajashree Jena
Prasanta Kumar ChoudhuryPrasanta Kumar Choudhury
Prasanta Kumar Choudhury
RPRitesh Pattnaik
Ritesh Pattnaik
SMSwati Mohapatra
Swati Mohapatra
MSManish Ranjan Saini
Manish Ranjan Saini
In recent decades, bioactive peptides have attracted increasing interest as health promoting functional foods. A variety of naturally formed bioactive peptides have been found in fermented dairy products such as yogurt, sour milk, and cheese. Initially these peptides are inactive within the sequence of the parent protein molecule and can be generated by gastrointestinal digestion of milk, fermentation of milk with proteolytic starter cultures, and/or hydrolysis by proteolytic enzymes. Milk derived peptides exert a number of health beneficial activities, even upon oral administration. Bioactive peptides have a great impact on major body systems including the digestive, nervous, endocrine, cardiovascular, diabetes type II, obesity, and immune systems. Antimicrobial peptides are also an important ingredient of innate immunity, especially at mucosal surfaces such as lungs and small intestine that are constantly exposed to a range of potential pathogens. Therefore, it plays an important role in boosting natural immune protection by reducing the risk of chronic diseases. Bioactive peptides are considered as potent drugs with well-defined pharmacological residues and also used to formulate health-enhancing nutraceuticals.

19 November 2013 in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSanjay Kumar
Sanjay Kumar
Prasanta Kumar ChoudhuryPrasanta Kumar Choudhury
Prasanta Kumar Choudhury
MCMaria Dolores Carro
Maria Dolores Carro
GGGareth W Griffith
Gareth W Griffith
SDSumit Singh Dagar
Sumit Singh Dagar
APAnil K. Puniya
Anil K. Puniya
The growing demand for sustainable animal production is compelling researchers to explore the potential approaches to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases from livestock that are mainly produced by enteric fermentation. Some potential solutions, for instance, the use of chemical inhibitors to reduce methanogenesis, are not feasible in routine use due to their toxicity to ruminants, inhibition of efficient rumen function or other transitory effects. Strategies, such as use of plant secondary metabolites and dietary manipulations have emerged to reduce the methane emission, but these still require extensive research before these can be recommended and deployed in the livestock industry sector. Furthermore, immunization vaccines for methanogens and phages are also under investigation for mitigation of enteric methanogenesis. The increasing knowledge of methanogenic diversity in rumen, DNA sequencing technologies and bioinformatics have paved the way for chemogenomic strategies by targeting methane producers. Chemogenomics will help in finding target enzymes and proteins, which will further assist in the screening of natural as well chemical inhibitors. The construction of a methanogenic gene catalogue through these approaches is an attainable objective. This will lead to understand the microbiome function, its relation with the host and feeds, and therefore, will form the basis of practically viable and eco-friendly methane mitigation approaches, while improving the ruminant productivity.


1 January 2015
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
Prasanta Kumar ChoudhuryPrasanta Kumar Choudhury
Prasanta Kumar Choudhury
Abdelfattah Z.M. SalemAbdelfattah Z.M. Salem
Abdelfattah Z.M. Salem
RJRajashree Jena
Rajashree Jena
SKSanjeev Kumar
Sanjeev Kumar
RSRameshwar Singh
Rameshwar Singh
APAnil K. Puniya
Anil K. Puniya

1 January 2021 in Current Research in Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ASAnukarna Singh
Anukarna Singh
SKSachin Kumar
Sachin Kumar
VVV.V. Vinay
V.V. Vinay
BTBhawna Tyagi
Bhawna Tyagi
Prasanta Kumar ChoudhuryPrasanta Kumar Choudhury
Prasanta Kumar Choudhury
ATAmrish Kumar Tyagi
Amrish Kumar Tyagi

29 November 2022 in Methane
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Prasanta Kumar ChoudhuryPrasanta Kumar Choudhury
Prasanta Kumar Choudhury
RJRajashree Jena
Rajashree Jena
STSudhir Kumar Tomar
Sudhir Kumar Tomar
APAnil K. Puniya
Anil K. Puniya
Climate change and the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emission from agriculture has resulted in significant pressure on the livestock industry for advanced practices that are environmentally more sustainable. Livestock is responsible for more than 15% of anthropogenic methane (CH4) emission via enteric fermentation and improved strategies for mitigating enteric CH4 production therefore represents a promising target to reduce the overall GHG contribution from agriculture. Ruminal CH4 is produced by methanogenic archaea, combining CO2 and hydrogen (H2). Removal of H2 is essential, as its accumulation inhibits many biological functions that are essential for maintaining a healthy rumen ecosystem. Although several other pathways occur in the rumen, including reductive acetogenesis, propionogenesis, nitrate, and sulfate reduction, methanogenesis seems to be the dominant pathway for H2 removal. Global warming is not the only problem associated with the release of CH4 from ruminants, but the released GHG also represent valuable metabolic energy that is lost to the animal and that needs to be replenished via its food. Therefore, reduction of enteric CH4 emissions will benefit not only the environment but also be an important step toward the efficient production of high-quality animal-based protein. In recent decades, several approaches, relying on a diverse set of biological and chemical compounds, have been tested for their ability to inhibit rumen methanogenesis reliably and without negative effects for the ruminant animal. Although many of these strategies initially appeared to be promising, they turned out to be less sustainable on the industrial scale and when implemented over an extended period. The development of a long-term solution most likely has been hindered by our still incomplete understanding of microbial processes that are responsible for maintaining and dictating rumen function. Since manipulation of the overall structure of the rumen microbiome is still a significant challenge targeting key intermediates of rumen methanogenesis, such as H2, and population that are responsible for maintaining the H2 equilibrium in the rumen could be a more immediate approach. Addition of microorganisms capable of non-methanogenic H2 sequestration or of reducing equivalents are potential avenues to divert molecular H2 from methanogenesis and therefore for abate enteric CH4. However, in order to achieve the best outcome, a detailed understanding of rumen microbiology is needed. Here we discuss some of the problems and benefits associated with alternate pathways, such as reductive acetogenesis, propionogenesis, and sulfate and nitrate reduction, which would allow us to bypass H2 production and accumulation in the rumen.