Santos Sanz-Fernández

Mr. Santos Sanz-Fernández


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 January 2023 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PHPablo Rodríguez Hernández
Pablo Rodríguez Hernández
CRCarolina Reyes-Palomo
Carolina Reyes-Palomo
SSSantos Sanz-Fernández
Santos Sanz-Fernández
PRPablo Jose Rufino-Moya
Pablo Jose Rufino-Moya
RZRafael Zafra
Rafael Zafra
CGCipriano Díaz Gaona
Cipriano Díaz Gaona
Internal parasites are one of the main causes of health threats in livestock production, especially in extensive livestock farming. Despite the environmental toxic effects (loss of dung beetles, biodiversity, and other issues) and resistance phenomenon derived from their prolonged use, anti-parasitic chemical pharmaceuticals are frequently used, even in organic farming. Such a situation within the context of climate change requires urgent exploration of alternative compounds to solve these problems and apparent conflicts between organic farming objectives regarding the environment, public health, and animal health. This review is focused on some plants (Artemisia spp., Cichorium intybus L., Ericaceae family, Hedysarum coronarium L., Lotus spp., Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) that are well known for their antiparasitic effect, are voluntarily grazed and ingested, and can be spontaneously found or cultivated in southern Europe and other regions with a Mediterranean climate. The differences found between effectiveness, parasite species affected, in vitro/in vivo experiments, and active compounds are explored. A total of 87 papers where antiparasitic activity of those plants have been studied are included in this review; 75% studied the effect on ruminant parasites, where gastrointestinal nematodes were the parasite group most studied (70%), and these included natural (31%) and experimental (37%) infections.

28 April 2022 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMarta Fornos
Marta Fornos
SSSantos Sanz-Fernández
Santos Sanz-Fernández
EMEncarnación Jimenez Moreno
Encarnación Jimenez Moreno
DCDomingo Carrión
Domingo Carrión
JGJosep Gasa
Josep Gasa
Vicente Rodriguez-EstevezVicente Rodriguez-Estevez
Vicente Rodriguez-Estevez
Based on the available data of feeding behaviour habits (FBHs), this work aimed to discuss which type of pig, according to its FBHs, performs better and is more efficient. As pigs grow, average daily feed intake, meal size, and feeding rate increase, whereas small variations or even decreases in time spent eating and daily feeder visits have been reported. Moreover, the sex, breed, space allowance, feeder design, feed form, diet composition, and environmental conditions modify FBHs. On the other hand, the literature indicates the existence of four types of pigs: pigs that eat their daily feed intake in many short meals (nibblers) or in few large meals (meal eaters) combined with eating fast (faster eaters) or slow (slow eaters). The available scientific literature about ad libitum fed pigs suggests that pigs eating faster with bigger meals eat more, gain more weight, and are fatter than pigs eating less, slower, and with smaller meals. However, the feeding rate and the meal size do not influence feed efficiency. In conclusion, studies comparing growing-finishing pigs with similar feed intake, but different feeding rate and meal size are needed to better understand the influence of FBHs on feed efficiency.

9 September 2023 in Meat Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ALAgnieszka Ludwiczak
Agnieszka Ludwiczak
Małgorzata Kasprowicz-PotockaMałgorzata Kasprowicz-Potocka
Małgorzata Kasprowicz-Potocka
Anita Zaworska-ZakrzewskaAnita Zaworska-Zakrzewska
Anita Zaworska-Zakrzewska
JSJoanna Składanowska-Baryza
Joanna Składanowska-Baryza
Vicente Rodriguez-EstevezVicente Rodriguez-Estevez
Vicente Rodriguez-Estevez
ESEwa Sell-Kubiak
Ewa Sell-Kubiak
This review has been developed as part of the mEATquality project with the main objective to examine the types of extensification practices used in European pig husbandry and their effect on intrinsic meat quality. Literature search has resulted in 679 references in total, from which 53 showed a strict compliance with the goals of this review: 1) the use of local European breeds and their crossbreds (22 papers); 2) addition of forage to diet (9 papers); 3) increased space allowance (3 papers); 4) enrichment of environment (19 papers). The evaluation of selected extensification factors showed that not all of them have a clear impact on meat quality, and are often confounded. The most clear differences were observed when comparing autochthonous with commercial breeds, and systems with access to pastures or woodlands vs. indoor housing. Despite many studies focusing on the extensification of husbandry practices, some of the factors cannot be confirmed to have a direct effect on pork intrinsic quality.

6 December 2024 in Veterinary Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSantos Sanz-Fernández
Santos Sanz-Fernández
PHPablo Rodríguez Hernández
Pablo Rodríguez Hernández
CGCipriano Díaz Gaona
Cipriano Díaz Gaona
LTLlibertat Tusell
Llibertat Tusell
RQRaquel Quintanilla
Raquel Quintanilla
Vicente Rodriguez-EstevezVicente Rodriguez-Estevez
Vicente Rodriguez-Estevez
This study examines the global evolution of sow productivity, with a particular focus on Spain. The analysis is based on key performance metrics such as piglets weaned per sow per year (PWSY), prolificacy, and pre-weaning mortality, utilizing data from literature reviews, the InterPIG, and BDporc® databases. Globally, significant advancements in genetic selection and management practices have led to productivity increases across major pig-producing countries, with notable improvements in prolificacy. However, higher prolificacy has been accompanied by rising piglet mortality rates during lactation, posing sustainability challenges. In Spain, the average productivity of commercial sows increased from 23.78 PWSY in 2009 to 29.45 PWSY in 2023, while Iberian sows reached an average of 17.44 PWSY. Despite these gains, Spain’s figures remain slightly below the European Union average. The study highlights the need for new benchmarks, such as non-productive days, piglet survival, and sow longevity, to more accurately assess farm efficiency. These indicators, combined with considerations for animal welfare and environmental sustainability, are crucial for addressing current challenges such as piglet mortality, sow culling, and the carbon footprint. The findings emphasize the importance of adopting comprehensive management strategies that balance productivity with growing social and environmental demands on the swine industry.

12 December 2023 in Journal of Animal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSantos Sanz-Fernández
Santos Sanz-Fernández
CGCipriano Díaz Gaona
Cipriano Díaz Gaona
JCJosé C Casas-Rosal
José C Casas-Rosal
NANuria Alòs
Nuria Alòs
LTLlibertat Tusell
Llibertat Tusell
Vicente Rodriguez-EstevezVicente Rodriguez-Estevez
Vicente Rodriguez-Estevez
Pre-weaning piglet mortality (PWM), a trait highly related to litter size, is one of the main concerns associated with productive efficiency and animal welfare in commercial pig farms. The objectives of this work were to study piglet survival at farm level, to establish a survival rate (SR) as a target indicator to be improved, and to model it based on other reproductive parameters. Analysed data corresponded to 580 Spanish commercial farms with a total inventory of 809,768 sows. These farms showed a mean SR of 85.70% piglets born alive (BA), that decreased to 81.81% when total piglets born (TB) were considered. The SR was strongly associated with prolificacy (P<0.01), the parities with highest prolificacy being those that had the lowest SR. Thus, the highest correlations were for the SR of piglets BA in the 3rd and 4th parities (r=-0.460 and r=-0.452, respectively, P<0.01), and for the SR of piglets TB in 4th parity (r=-0.546, P<0.01), which was the one with the highest prolificacy. The values corresponding to the quartile of farms with the highest SR within the most productive farms were established as targets to be improved, which were ≥88.5% piglets BA and 83.2% piglets TB. Nevertheless, the direct associations shown between the piglet’s survival and prolificacy and other productive factors, such as the age of piglets at weaning, the farrowings per sow and year and the farrowing interval, suggest the convenience of modelling the risk of PWM on farms to have its own target of survival index to be improved.

2 August 2025 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLorena Giglio
Lorena Giglio
TRTine Rousing
Tine Rousing
DŁDagmara Łodyga
Dagmara Łodyga
CRCarolina Reyes-Palomo
Carolina Reyes-Palomo
SSSantos Sanz-Fernández
Santos Sanz-Fernández
PFPaolo Ferrari
Paolo Ferrari
European pig farmers are challenged by increasingly stringent EU regulations to protect the environment from pollution, to meet animal welfare standards and to make pig farming more sustainable. Economic sustainability is defined as the ability to achieve higher profits by respecting social and natural resources. This study is focused on the analysis of the economic resilience of intensive and extensive farming systems, based on data collected from 56 farms located in Denmark, Poland, Italy and Spain. Productive and economic performances of these farms are analyzed, and economic resilience is assessed through a survey including a selection of indicators, belonging to different themes: [i] resilience of resources, [ii] entrepreneurship, [iii] propensity to extensification. The qualitative data from the questionnaire allow for an exploration of how production systems relate to the three dimensions of resilience. Different levels of resilience were found and discussed for intensive and extensive farms. The findings suggest that intensive farms benefit from high standards and greater bargaining power within the supply chain. Extensive systems can achieve profitability through value-added strategies and generally display good resilience. Policies that support investment and risk reduction are essential for enhancing farm resilience and robustness, while strengthening farmer networks can improve adaptability.