Benito Albarrán Portillo

Prof. Dr. Benito Albarrán Portillo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2013 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BPBenito Albarrán Portillo
Benito Albarrán Portillo
GPG.E. Pollott
G.E. Pollott
Higher milk production is commonly associated with poorer fertility in dairy cows. This study used a biological model of lactation to define more closely which characteristics of lactation were linked to increased calving interval, an easily recorded measure of fertility in commercial dairy herds. Large data sets from a national milk recording scheme in the United Kingdom, collected over a 10-yr period, were used to calculate the genetic and phenotypic correlations between calving interval and a range of lactation traits within the Holstein breed. A lactation curve was fitted to each lactation, and several characteristics of each lactation were calculated. These were used in a series of mixed-model bivariate analyses with calving interval to derive the genetic parameters. When heifer lactation curve trait data were used, the highest genetic correlations were found with peak yield, maximum secretion potential, and total lactation milk yield (0.59±0.06 to 0.63±0.05), reflecting the observed phenomenon of poorer fertility and higher milk production. Genetic correlations for calving interval were also calculated with the rate of increase in milk yield in early lactation (0.46±0.08), persistency (0.36±0.09), day of peak yield (0.20±0.02), and relative cell death rate (-0.12±0.09). The daily production of milk components was highly genetically correlated with calving interval, with values for fat, protein, lactose, and water being 0.73±0.15, 0.48±0.13, 0.57±0.13, and 0.50±0.13. With these results and breeding values derived from these analyses, 2 possible strategies were suggested for improving the relationship between milk yield and fertility in dairy cows. First, animals that break the correlations described above could be selected (e.g., bulls with high peak yield and low calving intervals). Second, animals with lower peak yields but better persistency could be selected to maintain total milk yield.

30 October 2008 in Tropical Animal Health and Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RRR. Rojo-Rubio
R. Rojo-Rubio
JAJose Fernando Vazquez Armijo
Jose Fernando Vazquez Armijo
PPP. Pérez-Hernández
P. Pérez-Hernández
GMGerman David Mendoza
German David Mendoza
Abdelfattah Z.M. SalemAbdelfattah Z.M. Salem
Abdelfattah Z.M. Salem
JGJ. G. Gutierrez-Cedillo
J. G. Gutierrez-Cedillo
Cattle production is one of the most important livestock activities in the rural areas of Mexico, with most of the national territory dedicated to it, in addition to the use of the most agricultural supplies and forages resources, as well as agricultural and agro-industrial by-products. Mexico is placed among the ten first meat and milk producer countries worldwide, being the Mexican tropical zone one of the main suppliers of such products. One of the main milk sources is the dual purpose cattle, such systems can be described as those that produce milk (daily milking) and meat (calf after weaning), on every productive cycle. They are mainly located in developing regions and characterized by using low-technology and in poor environments, consequently productive levels are considered low. Milk is destined for self-consumption or for sale at local markets and calf after weaning is sold at local feedlots or for export. Regarding to the little information available about the dual purpose systems, the present work is intended to discuss the main characteristics of cattle production in dual purpose systems in Mexico.

30 April 2011 in Livestock Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FJF.S. Jiménez-Peralta
F.S. Jiménez-Peralta
Abdelfattah Z.M. SalemAbdelfattah Z.M. Salem
Abdelfattah Z.M. Salem
PMP. Mejia-Hernández
P. Mejia-Hernández
Manuel Gonzalez  RonquilloManuel Gonzalez Ronquillo
Manuel Gonzalez Ronquillo
BPBenito Albarrán Portillo
Benito Albarrán Portillo
JTJ.L. Tinoco-Jaramillo
J.L. Tinoco-Jaramillo

10 May 2015 in Tropical Animal Health and Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ISIsela Guadalupe Salas-Reyes
Isela Guadalupe Salas-Reyes
CACarlos Manuel Arriaga-Jordán
Carlos Manuel Arriaga-Jordán
SRSamuel Rebollar-Rebollar
Samuel Rebollar-Rebollar
AGAnastacio García-Martínez
Anastacio García-Martínez
BPBenito Albarrán Portillo
Benito Albarrán Portillo

7 January 2015 in Tropical Animal Health and Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BPBenito Albarrán Portillo
Benito Albarrán Portillo
SRSamuel Rebollar-Rebollar
Samuel Rebollar-Rebollar
Anton GarciaAnton Garcia
Anton Garcia
RRRolando Rojo-Rubio
Rolando Rojo-Rubio
FAFrancisca Avilés-Nova
Francisca Avilés-Nova
CACarlos Manuel Arriaga-Jordán
Carlos Manuel Arriaga-Jordán

1 July 2002 in Experimental Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CACARLOS MANUEL ARRIAGA-JORDAN
CARLOS MANUEL ARRIAGA-JORDAN
BPBenito Albarrán Portillo
Benito Albarrán Portillo
AEAngélica Espinoza-Ortega
Angélica Espinoza-Ortega
Anton GarciaAnton Garcia
Anton Garcia
OCO. A. Castelán-Ortega
O. A. Castelán-Ortega
The on-farm evaluation of three feeding strategies for smallholder campesino dairy herds was undertaken in the highlands of Central Mexico with cooperating farmers: traditional, alternative and intermediate feeding strategies. All three incorporated grazing of cultivated pastures, but concentrate use was 4.0 and 7.0 kg per cow per day in the rainy and dry seasons respectively for the traditional feeding strategy, 3.3 for the alternative feeding strategy in both rainy and dry seasons and 5.0 and 9.0 kg per cow per day in the rainy and dry seasons respectively for the intermediate feeding strategy. Feeding during the dry season was based on maize straw in the traditional strategy, on pasture complemented with maize silage in the alternative feeding strategy, and with some maize silage but mostly maize straw in the intermediate feeding strategy. The trial ran between 25 September 1996 and 24 September 1997, divided by season into four, thirteen-week periods. Milk yields were recorded once per week, and live weight and body-condition score, every 28 days. Three cows per strategy that completed each period were blocked according to stage of lactation and used for the statistical analysis of a split-plot design with feeding strategies as main plots and weeks as split-plots. Overall mean milk yields were 15.5±2.05, 13.4±2.43 and 12.4±2.37 kg milk per cow per day for alternative, intermediate and traditional feeding strategies respectively, with significant interactions (P<0.05) for autumn, winter and summer. The alternative feeding strategy (with over 50% less concentrate) produced milk yields 0.24 and 0.38 higher than the intermediate and traditional feeding strategies in the dry season. In the rainy season, milk yields with the alternative feeding strategy (30% less concentrates) were 0.09 and 0.16 higher than the other two strategies. Margins per day of family labour were: alternative feeding strategy US$36.48 per day, intermediate feeding strategy US$9.22 per day and the traditional feeding strategy US$9.11 per day, although in the case of the last two there were two family members in charge of the dairy herds. Results demonstrate the successful integration of grazed pasture and maize silage for the efficient production of milk, and provide evidence on the productive use of limited campesino land resources in the face of unviable economic conditions for maize grain production.