Bret Webb

Dr. Bret Webb

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2017 in Journal of Structural Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IGIoannis Gidaris
Ioannis Gidaris
JPJamie E. Padgett
Jamie E. Padgett
ABAndre Barbosa
Andre Barbosa
SCSuren Chen
Suren Chen
DCDaniel Cox
Daniel Cox
ACAmy Cerato
Amy Cerato
Highway bridges are one of the most vulnerable constituents of transportation networks when exposed to one or more natural hazards, such as earthquakes, hurricanes, tsunamis, and riverine floods. To facilitate and enhance prehazard and posthazard event mitigation and emergency response strategies of transportation systems and entire communities, probabilistic risk and resilience assessment methodologies have attracted increased attention recently. In this context, fragility and restoration models for highway bridges subjected to a range of hazards are essential tools for efficient and accurate quantification of risk and resilience. This paper provides a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art fragility and restoration models for typical highway bridge classes that are applicable for implementation in multihazard risk and resilience analyses of regional portfolios or transportation networks in the United States. An overview of key gaps in the literature is also presented to guide future research.

30 March 2019 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RMRebecca Morris
Rebecca Morris
DBDonna M. Bilkovic
Donna M. Bilkovic
MBMaura K. Boswell
Maura K. Boswell
DBDavid Bushek
David Bushek
JCJust Cebrian
Just Cebrian
SSStephen E. Swearer
Stephen E. Swearer

1 January 2019 in Journal of Structural Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HMHassan Masoomi
Hassan Masoomi
John Van De LindtJohn Van De Lindt
John Van De Lindt
MAMohammad R. Ameri
Mohammad R. Ameri
TDTrung Q. Do
Trung Q. Do
BWBret Webb
Bret Webb
Coastal structures are subjected to multihazard events such as hurricanes which consist of hurricane-induced surge and waves as well as winds. Hurricanes are a common natural hazard in the United States and cause considerable damage every year, with resulting annualized losses in the United States in the tens of billions of dollars. Although improvements in construction practices have been notable over time for individual hazards, there is still a dearth of risk and damage prediction methods in the area of multiple hazards that are based on principles of mechanics. In this study, a methodology to develop multihazard damage fragilities is summarized and illustrated for a wood-frame residential-building archetype subjected to hurricane winds, storm surge, and waves. The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) requires new buildings along the US coastline to be constructed with the first finished floor set at an elevation that exceeds a minimum necessary elevation. Therefore, two different elevations are considered for the lowest horizontal structural member of the archetype to also examine its effect on damage fragilities. The developed multihazard fragilities are used to calculate the time-dependent probability of each damage state at a given location over the timeframe of an event, i.e., hurricane. In this regard, the spatial and temporal data of wind speeds, flood depths, and significant wave heights for Hurricane Ike are simulated by the ADCIRC + SWAN model (a tightly coupled version of the ADvanced CIRCulation model and the Simulating WAves Nearshore model for simulating the propagation of storm surge and waves from deep water to the coastal region). The performance of nonelevated and elevated archetypes is examined at different locations in southeast Texas for Hurricane Ike and a scenario of damage states predicted for this area for the elevated archetype.

3 February 2020 in Journal of Coastal Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NTNigel A. Temple
Nigel A. Temple
BWBret Webb
Bret Webb
Eric SparksEric Sparks
Eric Sparks
ALAnna C. Linhoss
Anna C. Linhoss
Temple, N.A.; Webb, B.M.; Sparks, E.L., and Linhoss, A.C., 0000. Low-cost pressure gauges for measuring water waves. Waves have profound effects on coastal geomorphology, but the understanding of wave climate effects on coastal ecology is limited due, in part, to the high cost of commercial wave gauges. High-cost gauges also limit the scope of coastal wave models and the ability of coastal land managers to design effective restoration, conservation and enhancement projects. To address these limitations, a low-cost do-it-yourself (DIY) wave gauge was constructed using commercial plumbing parts, a pressure sensor, an Arduino© microcontroller and adapted accessories. Details on gauge construction, coding and an instructional video tutorial are provided. Performance of the DIY gauge was determined by measuring the agreement of raw pressure data recorded by the DIY gauge to a comparable commercial gauge in both a laboratory wave channel study featuring a series of wave tests and in a complementary field test. Agreement of raw pressure data among gauges in the wave channel study was assessed using paired t-tests and by fitting linear models. Field test data agreement was assessed by comparing the total wave field energy recorded by each gauge and by fitting a linear model to recorded raw pressure data. Pressure data agreement between the gauges was excellent in all wave channel tests with mean differences between pressure readings consistently near zero and with 95% of all differences lying within ±63 Pascals (<1 cm static water depth), on average. The greatest variability between readings occurred within tests featuring high-frequency waves, mirroring results reported by others. Still, raw DIY wave gauge data explained, on average, 91% of the variance in raw commercial gauge data in wave channel tests. Field performance testing indicated similar gauge responses with 92% total wave energy agreement. Thus, the DIY wave gauge is a viable alternative to high-cost gauges that could improve the understanding and management of coastal environments.

26 November 2019 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Steven ScyphersSteven Scyphers
Steven Scyphers
MBMichael W. Beck
Michael W. Beck
KFKelsi L. Furman
Kelsi L. Furman
JHJudy Haner
Judy Haner
LJLauren Josephs
Lauren Josephs
JGJonathan H. Grabowski
Jonathan H. Grabowski
Coastal communities exist on the front lines of diverse natural hazards and the growing impacts of climate change. While traditional strategies for dealing with coastal hazards have often involved the hardening or armoring of shorelines, more recent research and practice have demonstrated the value and cost-effectiveness of “living shorelines” and other ecosystem-based strategies for coastal protection. To explore potential relationships among geographic exposure (waterfront vs. inland), shoreline condition (armored vs. natural), and hazard concerns, we surveyed 583 waterfront and inland residents in the northern Gulf of Mexico. We found that overall concern for coastal hazards was similar across waterfront and inland residents, as well as among residents with both armored and natural shorelines. However, concern for specific hazards differed across these groups. Waterfront residents were significantly more concerned about major hurricanes and erosion than inland residents. Conversely, inland residents were more concerned with drought and flooding than waterfront residents. Among waterfront residents, specific hazard concerns were similar between residents with natural and armored shorelines with two key exceptions. Residents with armored shorelines reported higher concern for erosion and sea level rise than residents with natural shorelines. Our results suggest that armored shorelines do not necessarily alleviate concerns about coastal hazards. In the context of balancing social and ecological objectives in addressing coastal hazards or adapting to climate change, understanding the perceptions and behaviors of coastal residents is essential for conserving and protecting coastal ecosystems along residential shorelines.

14 July 2016 in Journal of Coastal Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BWBret Webb
Bret Webb
CMChris Marr
Chris Marr
Webb, B.M. and Marr, C., 0000. Spatial variability of hydrodynamic timescales in a broad and shallow estuary: Mobile Bay, Alabama. Residence, exposure, and flushing times are examples of hydrodynamic timescales that describe the physical mass transport within a water body. The response and spatial variability of these measures to tides and discharge were investigated through hydrodynamic model simulations of Mobile Bay, Alabama using a two-dimensional depth-integrated circulation model coupled with a Lagrangian particle tracking model. Hydrodynamic timescales were estimated and analyzed using the particle tracking results. Flushing of the estuary was found to transition from tidally enhanced to river dominated for Q > 1715 m3 s−1. A simple power law regression was found to accurately represent the spatially averaged timescales (R2 > 0.99) for tidal and river forcing. Spatially averaged timescales generally ranged from 4 to 130 days, with large deviations related to particle initial position, magn...