Mariana Império

Dr. Mariana Império

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2020 in Energy Strategy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CBChristopher Bataille
Christopher Bataille
HWHenri Waisman
Henri Waisman
YBYann Briand
Yann Briand
JSJohannes Svensson
Johannes Svensson
AVAdrien Vogt-Schilb
Adrien Vogt-Schilb
MIMariana Império
Mariana Império

1 September 2016 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PRPedro R. R. Rochedo
Pedro R. R. Rochedo
ICIsabella V.L. Costa
Isabella V.L. Costa
MIMariana Império
Mariana Império
BHBettina Susanne Hoffmann
Bettina Susanne Hoffmann
PMPaulo Roberto de C. Merschmann
Paulo Roberto de C. Merschmann
RSRoberto Schaeffer
Roberto Schaeffer

1 May 2021 in Energy Strategy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DVDaniel Villamar
Daniel Villamar
RSRafael Soria
Rafael Soria
PRPedro Rochedo
Pedro Rochedo
Alexandre SzkloAlexandre Szklo
Alexandre Szklo
MIMariana Império
Mariana Império
RSRoberto Schaeffer
Roberto Schaeffer

31 October 2023 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ASAline Soterroni
Aline Soterroni
MIMariana Império
Mariana Império
MSMarluce C. Scarabello
Marluce C. Scarabello
NSNathalie Seddon
Nathalie Seddon
MOMichael Obersteiner
Michael Obersteiner
Ane AlencarAne Alencar
Ane Alencar
Most of the world's nations (around 130) have committed to reaching net‐zero carbon dioxide or greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050, yet robust policies rarely underpin these ambitions. To investigate whether existing and expected national policies will allow Brazil to meet its net‐zero GHG emissions pledge by 2050, we applied a detailed regional integrated assessment modelling approach. This included quantifying the role of nature‐based solutions, such as the protection and restoration of ecosystems, and engineered solutions, such as bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Our results highlight ecosystem protection as the most critical cost‐effective climate mitigation measure for Brazil, whereas relying heavily on costly and not‐mature‐yet engineered solutions will jeopardise Brazil's chances of achieving its net‐zero pledge by mid‐century. We show that the full implementation of Brazil's Forest Code (FC), a key policy for emission reduction in Brazil, would be enough for the country to achieve its short‐term climate targets up to 2030. However, it would reduce the gap to net‐zero GHG emissions by 38% by 2050. The FC, combined with zero legal deforestation and additional large‐scale ecosystem restoration, would reduce this gap by 62% by mid‐century, keeping Brazil on a clear path towards net‐zero GHG emissions by around 2040. While some level of deployment of negative emissions technologies will be needed for Brazil to achieve and sustain its net‐zero pledge, we show that the more mitigation measures from the land‐use sector, the less costly engineered solutions from the energy sector will be required. Our analysis underlines the urgent need for Brazil to go beyond existing policies to help fight climate emergency, to align its short‐ and long‐term climate targets, and to build climate resilience while curbing biodiversity loss.


26 April 2018 in Climatic Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJoana Portugal-Pereira
Joana Portugal-Pereira
AKAlexandre Koberle
Alexandre Koberle
ALAndre Lucena
Andre Lucena
PRPedro R. R. Rochedo
Pedro R. R. Rochedo
MIMariana Império
Mariana Império
PRPeter Rafaj
Peter Rafaj
This study examines the interactions between local air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions to assess potential synergies and trade-offs between local environmental pollution and climate policies, using the power generation sector in Brazil under different carbon scenarios up to 2050 as a case study. To this end, an integrated approach was developed, combining energy scenarios under different carbon mitigation targets and a local air pollution assessment model, tailored to the context of the Brazilian power sector. Results reveal that there are deep interactions between climate change mitigation and local air pollution abatement strategies. Increasing the diffusion of low-carbon technologies results in both mitigation of climate change and lower terrestrial acidification potential impacts, due to the rapid phase-out of fossil fuel power technologies. However, local air pollution indicators for particulate matter formation and human toxicity may rise in response to greenhouse gas emission mitigation constraints, indicating the existence of potential trade-offs. Some of these trade-offs can be offset by introducing available end-of-pipe pollution control measures reinforced by dedicated air quality policies.