Airborne Laser Scanners (ALS) and Terrestrial Laser Scanners (TLS) are two lidar systems frequently used for remote sensing forested ecosystems. The aim of this study was to compare crown metrics derived from TLS, ALS, and a combination of both for describing the crown structure and fuel attributes of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) dominated forest located at Eglin Air Force Base (AFB), Florida, USA. The study landscape was characterized by an ALS and TLS data collection along with field measurements within three large (1963 m² each) plots in total, each one representing a distinct stand condition at Eglin AFB. Tree-level measurements included bole diameter at breast height (DBH), total height (HT), crown base height (CBH), and crown width (CW). In addition, the crown structure and fuel metrics foliage biomass (FB), stem branches biomass (SB), crown biomass (CB), and crown bulk density (CBD) were calculated using allometric equations. Canopy Height Models (CHM) were created from ALS and TLS point clouds separately and by combining them (ALS + TLS). Individual trees were extracted, and crown-level metrics were computed from the three lidar-derived datasets and used to train random forest (RF) models. The results of the individual tree detection showed successful estimation of tree count from all lidar-derived datasets, with marginal errors ranging from −4 to 3%. For all three lidar-derived datasets, the RF models accurately predicted all tree-level attributes. Overall, we found strong positive correlations between model predictions and observed values (R² between 0.80 and 0.98), low to moderate errors (RMSE% between 4.56 and 50.99%), and low biases (between 0.03% and −2.86%). The highest R² using ALS data was achieved predicting CBH (R² = 0.98), while for TLS and ALS + TLS, the highest R² was observed predicting HT, CW, and CBD (R² = 0.94) and HT (R² = 0.98), respectively. Relative RMSE was lowest for HT using three lidar datasets (ALS = 4.83%, TLS = 7.22%, and ALS + TLS = 4.56%). All models and datasets had similar accuracies in terms of bias (<2.0%), except for CB in ALS (−2.53%) and ALS + TLS (−2.86%), and SB in ALS + TLS data (−2.22%). These results demonstrate the usefulness of all three lidar-related methodologies and lidar modeling overall, along with lidar applicability in the estimation of crown structure and fuel attributes of longleaf pine forest ecosystems. Given that TLS measurements are less practical and more expensive, our comparison suggests that ALS measurements are still reasonable for many applications, and its usefulness is justified. This novel tree-level analysis and its respective results contribute to lidar-based planning of forest structure and fuel management.

Effective estimation of fuel load is critical for mitigating wildfire risks. Here, we evaluate the performance of mobile laser scanning (MLS) and terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) to estimate fuel loads across multiple vegetation layers. Data were collected in two forest regions: the North Kaibab (NK) Plateau in Arizona and Monroe Mountain (MM) in Utah. We used random forest models to predict vegetation attributes, evaluating the performance of full models and transferred models using R², RMSE, and bias. The MLS consistently outperformed the TLS system, particularly for canopy-related attributes and woody biomass components. However, the TLS system showed potential for capturing canopy structure attributes, while offering advantages like operational simplicity, low equipment demands, and ease of deployment in the field, making it a cost-effective alternative for managers without access to more complex and expensive mobile or airborne systems. Our results show that model transferability between NK and MM is highly variable depending on the fuel attributes. Attributes related to canopy biomass showed better transferability, with small losses in predictive accuracy when models were transferred between the two sites. Conversely, surface fuel attributes showed more significant challenges for model transferability, given the difficulty of laser penetration in the lower vegetation layers. In general, models trained in NK and validated in MM consistently outperformed those trained in MM and transferred to NK. This may suggest that the NK plots captured a broader complexity of vegetation structure and environmental conditions from which models learned better and were able to generalize to MM. This study highlights the potential of ground-based LiDAR technologies in providing detailed information and important insights into fire risk and forest structure.

Southern U.S. forests are essential for carbon storage and timber production but are increasingly impacted by natural disturbances, highlighting the need to understand their dynamics and recovery. Canopy cover is a key indicator of forest health and resilience. Advances in remote sensing, such as NASA’s GEDI spaceborne LiDAR, enable more precise mapping of canopy cover. Although GEDI provides accurate data, its limited spatial coverage restricts large-scale assessments. To address this, we combined GEDI with Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), and optical imagery (Sentinel-1 GRD and Landsat–Sentinel Harmonized (HLS)) data to create a comprehensive canopy cover map for Florida. Using a random forest algorithm, our model achieved an R² of 0.69, RMSD of 0.17, and MD of 0.001, based on out-of-bag samples for internal validation. Geographic coordinates and the red spectral channel emerged as the most influential predictors. External validation with airborne laser scanning (ALS) data across three sites yielded an R² of 0.70, RMSD of 0.29, and MD of −0.22, confirming the model’s accuracy and robustness in unseen areas. Statewide analysis showed lower canopy cover in southern versus northern Florida, with wetland forests exhibiting higher cover than upland sites. This study demonstrates the potential of integrating multiple remote sensing datasets to produce accurate vegetation maps, supporting forest management and sustainability efforts in Florida.

A range of sublethal tree health conditions alter tree structure and tree growth, yet how health conditions rank in their consequences for tree growth and how these effects vary by species remain poorly quantified. Using repeated health assessment and growth measurements for 37,338 trees across four ForestGEO plots in eastern North America we ask which health conditions and syndromes most strongly suppress tree growth and whether species differ in their sensitivity. We summarized health patterns using Principal Coordinates Analysis, and basal area increment was modeled using mixed-effects linear regression models. Two dominant damage gradients emerged from multivariate patterns in tree health conditions. The first indicated crown-level damage, characterized by defoliation, leaf damage, and insect infestation. The second captured compounded damage, in which crown-level damage co-occurred with structural injury such as stem wounds and decay. Both gradients were associated with reduced growth, but compounded damage resulted in a greater reduction in basal area increment in subcanopy trees than crown damage alone (3.7% vs. 6.1%). Growth responses to crown-level damage varied widely among species, whereas responses to compounded damage were more consistently negative across taxa. Species that were most frequently damaged were not necessarily those experiencing the strongest growth suppression, highlighting a distinction between damage prevalence and damage tolerance. Our results demonstrate that sublethal tree health conditions can suppress tree growth in species-specific ways and accounting for the type and combination of health stressors, as well as variation in sensitivity among taxa, may improve assessments of forest vulnerability.