This work aims to implement an automated data-driven model for breast cancer detection in mammograms to support physicians’ decision process within a breast cancer screening or detection program. The public available CBIS-DDSM and the INbreast datasets were used as sources to implement the transfer learning technique on full-field digital mammography proprietary dataset. The proprietary dataset reflects a real heterogeneous case study, consisting of 190 masses, 46 asymmetries, and 71 distortions. Several Yolo architectures were compared, including YoloV3, YoloV5, and YoloV5-Transformer. In addition, Eigen-CAM was implemented for model introspection and outputs explanation by highlighting all the suspicious regions of interest within the mammogram. The small YoloV5 model resulted in the best developed solution obtaining an mAP of 0.621 on proprietary dataset. The saliency maps computed via Eigen-CAM have proven capable solution reporting all regions of interest also on incorrect prediction scenarios. In particular, Eigen-CAM produces a substantial reduction in the incidence of false negatives, although accompanied by an increase in false positives. Despite the presence of hard-to-recognize anomalies such as asymmetries and distortions on the proprietary dataset, the trained model showed encouraging detection capabilities. The combination of Yolo predictions and the generated saliency maps represent two complementary outputs for the reduction of false negatives. Nevertheless, it is imperative to regard these outputs as qualitative tools that invariably necessitate clinical radiologic evaluation. In this view, the model represents a trusted predictive system to support cognitive and decision-making, encouraging its integration into real clinical practice.

Melanoma is a malignant cancer type which develops when DNA damage occurs (mainly due to environmental factors such as ultraviolet rays). Often, melanoma results in intense and aggressive cell growth that, if not caught in time, can bring one toward death. Thus, early identification at the initial stage is fundamental to stopping the spread of cancer. In this paper, a ViT-based architecture able to classify melanoma versus non-cancerous lesions is presented. The proposed predictive model is trained and tested on public skin cancer data from the ISIC challenge, and the obtained results are highly promising. Different classifier configurations are considered and analyzed in order to find the most discriminating one. The best one reached an accuracy of 0.948, sensitivity of 0.928, specificity of 0.967, and AUROC of 0.948.

This study was aimed to investigate the predictive value of the radiomics features extracted from pericoronaric adipose tissue — around the anterior interventricular artery (IVA) — to assess the condition of coronary arteries compared with the use of clinical characteristics alone (i.e., risk factors). Clinical and radiomic data of 118 patients were retrospectively analyzed. In total, 93 radiomics features were extracted for each ROI around the IVA, and 13 clinical features were used to build different machine learning models finalized to predict the impairment (or otherwise) of coronary arteries. Pericoronaric radiomic features improved prediction above the use of risk factors alone. In fact, with the best model (Random Forest + Mutual Information) the AUROC reached $$0.820 \pm 0.076$$0.820 ± 0.076 . As a matter of fact, the combined use of both types of features (i.e., radiomic and clinical) allows for improved performance regardless of the feature selection method used. Experimental findings demonstrated that the use of radiomic features alone achieves better performance than the use of clinical features alone, while the combined use of both clinical and radiomic biomarkers further improves the predictive ability of the models. The main contribution of this work concerns: (i) the implementation of multimodal predictive models, based on both clinical and radiomic features, and (ii) a trusted system to support clinical decision-making processes by means of explainable classifiers and interpretable features.

Migraine is a burdensome neurological disorder that still lacks clear and easily accessible diagnostic biomarkers. Furthermore, a straightforward pathway is hard to find for migraineurs’ management, so the search for response predictors has become urgent. Nowadays, artificial intelligence (AI) has pervaded almost every aspect of our lives, and medicine has not been missed. Its applications are nearly limitless, and the ability to use machine learning approaches has given researchers a chance to give huge amounts of data new insights. When it comes to migraine, AI may play a fundamental role, helping clinicians and patients in many ways. For example, AI-based models can increase diagnostic accuracy, especially for non-headache specialists, and may help in correctly classifying the different groups of patients. Moreover, AI models analysing brain imaging studies reveal promising results in identifying disease biomarkers. Regarding migraine management, AI applications showed value in identifying outcome measures, the best treatment choices, and therapy response prediction. In the present review, the authors introduce the various and most recent clinical applications of AI regarding migraine.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic had devastating effects on various aspects of life: clinical cases, ranging from mild to severe, can lead to lung failure and to death. Due to the high incidence, data-driven models can support physicians in patient management. The explainability and interpretability of machine-learning models are mandatory in clinical scenarios. In this work, clinical, laboratory and radiomic features were used to train machine-learning models for COVID-19 prognosis prediction. Using Explainable AI algorithms, a multi-level explainable method was proposed taking into account the developer and the involved stakeholder (physician, and patient) perspectives. A total of 1023 radiomic features were extracted from 1589 Chest X-Ray images (CXR), combined with 38 clinical/laboratory features. After the pre-processing and selection phases, 40 CXR radiomic features and 23 clinical/laboratory features were used to train Support Vector Machine and Random Forest classifiers exploring three feature selection strategies. The combination of both radiomic, and clinical/laboratory features enabled higher performance in the resulting models. The intelligibility of the used features allowed us to validate the models’ clinical findings. According to the medical literature, LDH, PaO2 and CRP were the most predictive laboratory features. Instead, ZoneEntropy and HighGrayLevelZoneEmphasis - indicative of the heterogeneity/uniformity of lung texture - were the most discriminating radiomic features. Our best predictive model, exploiting the Random Forest classifier and a signature composed of clinical, laboratory and radiomic features, achieved AUC=0.819, accuracy=0.733, specificity=0.705, and sensitivity=0.761 in the test set. The model, including a multi-level explainability, allows us to make strong clinical assumptions, confirmed by the literature insights.