The Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for the Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) provides new-generation satellite precipitation datasets with high spatio-temporal resolution and accuracy, which is widely applied in hydrology and meteorology. However, most examinations of the IMERG were conducted on daily, monthly, and annual scales, and inadequate research focused on the sub-daily scale. Thus, this study set up four sub-daily scales (1 h, 3 h, 12 h, and 24 h at 0.1° spatial resolution) and four spatial scales (0.1°, 0.25°, 0.5°, and 1° at 1 h temporal resolution) to finely evaluate the performance of IMERG products in the summer seasons from 2014 to 2019 over mainland China. The precipitation amount (PA), frequency (PF), and intensity (PI) were adopted to assess the performance of the IMERG referenced by the ground-based precipitation product of the China Meteorological Administration (CMA). The results show that the IMERG can capture the spatial patterns of precipitation characters over mainland China, but the PA and PI are overestimated and the PF is underestimated, and the evaluation results are highly sensitive to the different temporal and spatial resolutions. Compared with fine spatio-temporal scales, the performance of the IMERG is significantly improved when scaled up to coarser scales. Moreover, the IMERG shows a better performance of PA and PI in larger regions and during longer periods. This study provided a reference for the application of IMERG products in different spatial and temporal scales.

As a tipping bucket rain gauge, the HOBO Data Logging Rain Gauge RG3-M (RG3-M) has been widely used for the field precipitation observation owing to its superiority of independent power supply by a small portable battery. To quantify the measurement accuracy of the RG3-M gauge, a standard Manual Gauge (MG) and eight other models of tipping bucket rain gauges were installed at the Chuzhou hydrological experiment station of China. In this study, we first compared and investigated the accumulated mounts of 18 rainfall events of two RG3-M gauges benchmarked by the standard MG. Then, five typical rainfall events were chosen to further analyse the observed accuracy of the RG3-M gauge for different rainfall intensities at hourly temporal scale. Finally, the impacts of wind speed and rainfall intensity on the precipitation measurements of the RG3-M gauge were preliminarily explored. Results indicate that the RG3-M gauge measurement generally underestimates rainfall approximately −4% against the standard MG observation, but the maximum deviation even reaches −12.87%. In terms of the hourly rainfall process, the reliable measurement scope of the RG3-M gauge is ranging from 1.5 to 3 mm/h; however, it should be noted that the underestimation is rather significant at the higher rainfall rates (>6 mm/h). Last, it was found that rainfall intensity is a nonnegligible factor for influencing the measurement of the RG3-M gauge. But the windy effect seems to be insignificant in our experiments, which might be attributed to the similar exposure of the compared gauges.