Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu

Prof. Dr. Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, İstanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2018 in Journal of Endodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YHyelda Erdem Hepşenoğlu
yelda Erdem Hepşenoğlu
Tan Fırat EyüboğluTan Fırat Eyüboğlu
Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu
Mutlu ÖzcanMutlu Özcan
Mutlu Özcan
The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative pain after single-visit and 2-visit non-surgical endodontic retreatments with 2 different intracanal medicaments. A total of 150 patients with asymptomatic root canal-treated teeth in need of nonsurgical endodontic retreatment were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 50). Patients were selected randomly from among those without preoperative pain. Patients in group 1 (single visit) were treated in a single visit. Patients in group 2 and group 3 were treated in different visits with calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine (CHX) as intracanal medicaments. The presence of postoperative pain was assessed 1, 2, 3, and 7 days and 1 month after treatment. All 2-visit treatments were completed 1 week after the initial visit. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and Pearson chi-square tests (α = 0.01, 0.05). Postoperative pain was significantly higher in the CHX group in comparison with the single-visit group (P ≤ .05) on the first day of assessment. On the second day, postoperative pain was significantly less in the single-visit group (P < .05) than in the other 2 groups. There were no significant differences among the groups on the third and seventh days of assessment. At the 1-month assessment, postoperative pain was significantly higher in both the calcium hydroxide group (P < .05) and the CHX group (P < .05) in comparison with the single-visit group. Single-visit nonsurgical endodontic retreatment presented fewer incidences of postoperative pain in comparison with 2-visit nonsurgical endodontic retreatment based on assessments ranging from 1 day to 1 month.

22 September 2016 in Clinical Oral Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Tan Fırat EyüboğluTan Fırat Eyüboğlu
Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu
KOKezban Olcay
Kezban Olcay
Mutlu ÖzcanMutlu Özcan
Mutlu Özcan


10 May 2024 in Journal of Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VRVygandas Rutkunas
Vygandas Rutkunas
DJDarius Jegelevičius
Darius Jegelevičius
AGAgnė Gedrimienė
Agnė Gedrimienė
LALiudas Auškalnis
Liudas Auškalnis
Tan Fırat EyüboğluTan Fırat Eyüboğlu
Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu
JPJustinas Pletkus
Justinas Pletkus

24 March 2023 in Current Oral Health Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDShantanu Deshpande
Shantanu Deshpande
SKSupriya Kheur
Supriya Kheur
MKMohit Kheur
Mohit Kheur
Tan Fırat EyüboğluTan Fırat Eyüboğlu
Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu
Mutlu ÖzcanMutlu Özcan
Mutlu Özcan
Purpose of Review: Zeolite is an aluminosilicate compound having a wide spectrum of applications in medicine and dentistry. Several articles were published combining zeolites with various other elements for different applications in dentistry. This review aims to provide a detailed review on the origin of zeolites, their physical and chemical properties and possible applications as dental materials. Recent Findings: Zeolite-based hybrid films can be used for detection of oral cancers. Silver zeolite can be added in restorative materials and dental liners. In cases of root canal irrigation, chlorhexidine zeolite is used owing to its antibacterial properties. For dental implants, a zeolite coating can improve the osseointegration. Summary: Due to its microporous structure, application-driven zeolitic frameworks can be prepared by sieving in various cations and antibacterial compounds. This review helps improve our understanding regarding the uses of zeolites as a material in different aspects of dentistry along with possible further improvements as a dental material.

1 January 2020 in BioMed Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Tan Fırat EyüboğluTan Fırat Eyüboğlu
Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu
KOKeziban Olcay
Keziban Olcay
EEErhan Erkan
Erhan Erkan
Mutlu ÖzcanMutlu Özcan
Mutlu Özcan
This study evaluated the long‐term clinical outcomes of single‐visit root canal treatments with apical enlargement on patients with necrotic pulp tissue retrospectively. A total of 137 teeth with necrotic pulp tissue which underwent single‐visit root canal treatments were included. The root canals were shaped up until the apical constriction, which was determined by an apex locator. The outcomes were evaluated by two independent and calibrated endodontists clinically and radiographically. Teeth were dichotomized into healed (PAI ≤ 2, no signs or symptoms) and nonhealed (PAI > 2, with/without signs or symptoms) groups. Each patients’ preoperative PAI and lesion size were recorded to evaluate the preoperative periapical status as well as several other prognostic factors. Statistical analyses were performed (p = 0.05) on ninety teeth. The mean observation time was 60 months. Out of ninety teeth, 87 (96.7%) were healed and 3 (3.3%) were nonhealed. No correlations were found between the prognostic factors and the outcomes (p > 0.05). Cohen’s kappa and Gwet’s agreement coefficient scores between the preoperative PAI scores and preoperative lesion sizes showed good agreements, with values of 0.834 and 0.898, respectively. Apical enlargement is a viable treatment option for single‐visit root canal treatments.