The angiopoietin/Tie (ANG/Tie) receptor system controls developmental and tumor angiogenesis, inflammatory vascular remodeling, and vessel leakage. ANG1 is a Tie2 agonist that promotes vascular stabilization in inflammation and sepsis, whereas ANG2 is a context-dependent Tie2 agonist or antagonist. A limited understanding of ANG signaling mechanisms and the orphan receptor Tie1 has hindered development of ANG/Tie-targeted therapeutics. Here, we determined that both ANG1 and ANG2 binding to Tie2 increases Tie1-Tie2 interactions in a β₁ integrin–dependent manner and that Tie1 regulates ANG-induced Tie2 trafficking in endothelial cells. Endothelial Tie1 was essential for the agonist activity of ANG1 and autocrine ANG2. Deletion of endothelial Tie1 in mice reduced Tie2 phosphorylation and downstream Akt activation, increased FOXO1 nuclear localization and transcriptional activation, and prevented ANG1- and ANG2-induced capillary-to-venous remodeling. However, in acute endotoxemia, the Tie1 ectodomain that is responsible for interaction with Tie2 was rapidly cleaved, ANG1 agonist activity was decreased, and autocrine ANG2 agonist activity was lost, which led to suppression of Tie2 signaling. Tie1 cleavage also occurred in patients with hantavirus infection. These results support a model in which Tie1 directly interacts with Tie2 to promote ANG-induced vascular responses under noninflammatory conditions, whereas in inflammation, Tie1 cleavage contributes to loss of ANG2 agonist activity and vascular stability.

Children with the severe phenotype of the genetic immunodeficiency disease leukocyte adhesion deficiency or LAD experience life-threatening bacterial infections because of molecular defects in the leukocyte integrin CD18 molecule and the resultant failure to express the CD11/CD18 adhesion molecules on the leukocyte surface. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only definitive therapy for LAD; however, the degree of donor chimerism and particularly the number of CD18⁺ donor-derived neutrophils required to reverse the disease phenotype are not known. We performed nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantations from healthy matched littermates in 9 dogs with the canine form of LAD known as CLAD and demonstrate that in the 3 dogs with the lowest level of donor chimerism, less than 500 CD18⁺ donor-derived neutrophils/μL in the peripheral blood of the CLAD recipients resulted in reversal of the CLAD disease phenotype. These results demonstrate the value of a disease-specific, large-animal model for identifying the lowest therapeutic level required for successful cellular and gene therapy. (Blood. 2004;103:3582-3589)

While urban expansion increasingly encroaches on natural habitats, many wildlife species capitalize on anthropogenic food resources, which have the potential to both positively and negatively influence their responses to infection. Here we examine how food availability and key nutrients have been reported to shape innate and adaptive immunity in wildlife by drawing from field-based studies, as well as captive and food restriction studies with wildlife species. Examples of food provisioning and key nutrients enhancing immune function were seen across the three study type distinctions, as were cases of trace metals and pharmaceuticals impairing the immunity of wildlife species. More generally, food provisioning in field studies tended to increase innate and adaptive responses to certain immune challenges, whereas patterns were less clear in captive studies. Mild food restriction often enhanced, whereas severe food restriction frequently impaired immunity. However, to enable stronger conclusions we stress a need for further research, especially field studies, and highlight the importance of integrating nutritional manipulation, immune challenge, and functional outcomes. Despite current gaps in research on this topic, modern high throughput molecular approaches are increasingly feasible for wildlife studies and offer great opportunities to better understand human influences on wildlife health. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Anthropogenic resource subsidies and host–parasite dynamics in wildlife’.