Paolo Pellicioli

Dr. Paolo Pellicioli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2020 in Physics in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Stefan BartzschStefan Bartzsch
Stefan Bartzsch
SCStéphanie Corde
Stéphanie Corde
JCJeffrey C Crosbie
Jeffrey C Crosbie
LDLiam Robert James Day
Liam Robert James Day
MDMattia Donzelli
Mattia Donzelli
MTMoeava Tehei
Moeava Tehei
In the last 25 years microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional radiation therapy at large, third generation synchrotrons. In MRT, a multi-slit collimator modulates a kilovoltage x-ray beam on a micrometer scale, creating peak dose areas with unconventionally high doses of several hundred Grays separated by low dose valley regions, where the dose remains well below the tissue tolerance level. Pre-clinical evidence demonstrates that such beam geometries lead to substantially reduced damage to normal tissue at equal tumour control rates and hence drastically increase the therapeutic window. Although the mechanisms behind MRT are still to be elucidated, previous studies indicate that immune response, tumour microenvironment, and the microvasculature may play a crucial role. Beyond tumour therapy, MRT has also been suggested as a microsurgical tool in neurological disorders and as a primer for drug delivery. The physical properties of MRT demand innovative medical physics and engineering solutions for safe treatment delivery. This article reviews technical developments in MRT and discusses existing solutions for dosimetric validation, reliable treatment planning and safety. Instrumentation at synchrotron facilities, including beam production, collimators and patient positioning systems, is also discussed. Specific solutions reviewed in this article include: dosimetry techniques that can cope with high spatial resolution, low photon energies and extremely high dose rates of up to 15 000 Gy s −1 , dose calculation algorithms—apart from pure Monte Carlo Simulations—to overcome the challenge of small voxel sizes and a wide dynamic dose-range, and the use of dose-enhancing nanoparticles to combat the limited penetrability of a kilovoltage energy spectrum. Finally, concepts for alternative compact microbeam sources are presented, such as inverse Compton scattering set-ups and carbon nanotube x-ray tubes, that may facilitate the transfer of MRT into a hospital-based clinical environment. Intensive research in recent years has resulted in practical solutions to most of the technical challenges in MRT. Treatment planning, dosimetry and patient safety systems at synchrotrons have matured to a point that first veterinary and clinical studies in MRT are within reach. Should these studies confirm the promising results of pre-clinical studies, the authors are confident that MRT will become an effective new radiotherapy option for certain patients.

17 September 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Cristian Fernandez-PalomoCristian Fernandez-Palomo
Cristian Fernandez-Palomo
VTVerdiana Trappetti
Verdiana Trappetti
MPMarine Potez
Marine Potez
PPPaolo Pellicioli
Paolo Pellicioli
Valentin DjonovValentin Djonov
Valentin Djonov
Valentin DjonovValentin Djonov
Valentin Djonov
Background: Synchrotron Microbeam Radiotherapy (MRT) significantly improves local tumour control with minimal normal tissue toxicity. MRT delivers orthovoltage X-rays at an ultra-high “FLASH” dose rate in spatially fractionated beams, typically only few tens of micrometres wide. One of the biggest challenges in translating MRT to the clinic is its use of high peak doses, of around 300–600 Gy, which can currently only be delivered by synchrotron facilities. Therefore, in an effort to improve the translation of MRT to the clinic, this work studied whether the temporal fractionation of traditional MRT into several sessions with lower, more clinically feasible, peak doses could still maintain local tumour control. Methods: Two groups of twelve C57Bl/6J female mice harbouring B16-F10 melanomas in their ears were treated with microbeams of 50 µm in width spaced by 200 µm from their centres. The treatment modality was either (i) a single MRT session of 401.23 Gy peak dose (7.40 Gy valley dose, i.e., dose between beams), or (ii) three MRT sessions of 133.41 Gy peak dose (2.46 Gy valley dose) delivered over 3 days in different anatomical planes, which intersected at 45 degrees. The mean dose rate was 12,750 Gy/s, with exposure times between 34.2 and 11.4 ms, respectively. Results: Temporally fractionated MRT ablated 50% of B16-F10 mouse melanomas, preventing organ metastases and local tumour recurrence for 18 months. In the rest of the animals, the median survival increased by 2.5-fold in comparison to the single MRT session and by 4.1-fold with respect to untreated mice. Conclusions: Temporally fractionating MRT with lower peak doses not only maintained tumour control, but also increased the efficacy of this technique. These results demonstrate that the solution to making MRT more clinically feasible is to irradiate with several fractions of intersecting arrays with lower peak doses. This provides alternatives to synchrotron sources where future microbeam radiotherapy could be delivered with less intense radiation sources.

1 September 2019 in Physica Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PPPaolo Pellicioli
Paolo Pellicioli
SBS. Bartzsch
S. Bartzsch
MDM. Donzelli
M. Donzelli
MKM. Krisch
M. Krisch
EBE. Bräuer-Krisch
E. Bräuer-Krisch

1 March 2020 in Physica Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YSYasser Shaban Soliman
Yasser Shaban Soliman
PPPaolo Pellicioli
Paolo Pellicioli
WBW.B. Beshir
W.B. Beshir
AAAtef A. Abdel-Fattah
Atef A. Abdel-Fattah
RFRamy Amer Fahim
Ramy Amer Fahim
EBElke Bräuer-Krisch
Elke Bräuer-Krisch

1 September 2019 in Physica Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AOAlexandre Ocadiz
Alexandre Ocadiz
JLJayde Livingstone
Jayde Livingstone
MDMattia Donzelli
Mattia Donzelli
Stefan BartzschStefan Bartzsch
Stefan Bartzsch
CNChristian Nemoz
Christian Nemoz
JAJean-François Adam
Jean-François Adam

27 April 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSara Sabatasso
Sara Sabatasso
Cristian Fernandez-PalomoCristian Fernandez-Palomo
Cristian Fernandez-Palomo
RHRuslan Hlushchuk
Ruslan Hlushchuk
JFJennifer Fazzari
Jennifer Fazzari
STStefan Tschanz
Stefan Tschanz
Valentin DjonovValentin Djonov
Valentin Djonov
Background: Microbeam Radiation Therapy (MRT) induces a transient vascular permeability window, which offers a novel drug-delivery system for the preferential accumulation of therapeutic compounds in tumors. MRT is a preclinical cancer treatment modality that spatially fractionates synchrotron X-rays into micrometer-wide planar microbeams which can induce transient vascular permeability, especially in the immature tumor vessels, without compromising vascular perfusion. Here, we characterized this phenomenon using Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) and demonstrated its therapeutic potential in human glioblastoma xenografts in mice. Methods: the developing CAM was exposed to planar-microbeams of 75 Gy peak dose with Synchrotron X-rays. Similarly, mice harboring human glioblastoma xenografts were exposed to peak microbeam doses of 150 Gy, followed by treatment with Cisplatin. Tumor progression was documented by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and caliper measurements. Results: CAM exposed to MRT exhibited vascular permeability, beginning 15 min post-irradiation, reaching its peak from 45 min to 2 h, and ending by 4 h. We have deemed this period the “permeability window”. Morphological analysis showed partially fragmented endothelial walls as the cause of the increased transport of FITC-Dextran into the surrounding tissue and the extravasation of 100 nm microspheres (representing the upper range of nanoparticles). In the human glioblastoma xenografts, MRI measurements showed that the combined treatment dramatically reduced the tumor size by 2.75-fold and 5.25-fold, respectively, compared to MRT or Cisplatin alone. Conclusions: MRT provides a novel mechanism for drug delivery by increasing vascular transpermeability while preserving vessel integrity. This permeability window increases the therapeutic index of currently available chemotherapeutics and could be combined with other therapeutic agents such as Nanoparticles/Antibodies/etc.