Background: Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients are at increased risk of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) due to intensive therapy and prolonged neutropenia. While pediatric guidelines support administering fluconazole or mold-active agents, the evidence in adults is limited. This study presents the first multicenter retrospective comparison of fluconazole and micafungin use in this setting. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 336 adult ALL patients from 11 centers in Türkiye (2010–2024) who received fluconazole (n = 230) or micafungin (n = 106) during induction chemotherapy. IFIs were classified according to the EORTC/MSG criteria. Results: The median age was 38.5 years, and 38.7% were female. Proven/probable IFIs occurred in 8.9% of patients, with similar rates between the fluconazole and micafungin groups (8.7% vs. 9.4%; p = 0.82). Multivariate analysis confirmed no significant association between the prophylactic antifungal type and IFI incidence, indicating comparable outcomes across groups. The median prophylaxis duration was longer with fluconazole, while the discontinuation rates, switch patterns, and subsequent antifungal use were comparable. The overall infection rates (~60%) and distribution of bacterial, viral, and polymicrobial infections were similar between the two groups. Prior bacterial infection increased the risk of IFI by 2.7-fold, and IFI-positive patients had longer neutropenia. At the end of induction, the remission, refractory, and mortality rates were similar between groups. The median overall survival was 24 months. Conclusions: Fluconazole and micafungin showed similar efficacy as the primary antifungal prophylaxis treatment in adult ALL patients. Given the limited evidence in adults and the ongoing need to optimize antifungal strategies, prospective randomized trials directly comparing these agents in this population are needed to confirm and expand upon our findings.

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive and biologically diverse hematologic cancer that disproportionately affects older individuals. Despite advances in molecular profiling and therapy, long-term outcomes remain unsatisfactory. This nationwide registry was established to provide real-world insights into clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and survival among adult AML patients in Turkey. Methods: The Turkish AML Registry Project (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05979675) combines retrospective and prospective data from 23 tertiary hematology centers. Adult patients diagnosed between January 2008 and July 2023 were included. Baseline demographics, European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 risk groups, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, treatment intensity, and targeted therapy use were analyzed. Response and survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan–Meier methods. Results: The interim dataset included 891 patients (median age 58 years, 45.5% ≥60). Intensive chemotherapy, most commonly 7 + 3, was applied in 74.1%, while 25.9% received lower-intensity regimens. Targeted agents, mainly venetoclax, were incorporated more frequently into low-intensity therapies (19.1% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001). Complete remission occurred in 70.2% after intensive and 35.9% after low-intensity therapy, improving to 51.4% with targeted agents. Median overall survival (OS) was 27.2 months, with 1-year OS rates of 54.1%, 28.9%, and 17.6% for favorable, intermediate, and adverse ELN groups (p < 0.001). ECOG 0–1 predicted superior survival (1-year OS 70.3% vs. 47.0%). Conclusions: Nationwide real-world evidence underscores the prognostic relevance of ELN risk and functional status in AML. While intensive chemotherapy remains central, combining targeted agents with low-intensity regimens improves outcomes in less fit patients and supports personalized treatment approaches.

Background/Objectives: Multiple myeloma (MM) patients receiving immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Standard prophylaxis typically involves aspirin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), guided by risk assessment tools such as SAVED and IMPEDE-VTE. However, these models have practical limitations, and real-world evidence supporting novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) as primary prophylaxis remains limited. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, we analyzed 101 MM patients treated with IMiD-based therapy between January 2020 and December 2024. All patients received NOAC prophylaxis (apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily or rivaroxaban 10–20 mg once daily), irrespective of baseline thrombotic risk. Clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and treatment details were collected. The primary outcome was objectively confirmed VTE, while secondary outcomes included bleeding events and treatment feasibility, assessed by treatment continuation without clinically significant bleeding. Results: Median age was 63 years (range 35–89); 36.6% were female. Lenalidomide and pomalidomide were used in 86.1% and 13.9%, respectively. Twenty-eight patients (27.7%) had relapsed/refractory disease, while 72.3% were newly diagnosed. Over a median NOAC exposure of 6 months, two patients (2.0%) developed VTE (both deep vein thrombosis). One major bleeding event (1.0%) occurred. Conclusions: Universal NOAC prophylaxis in MM patients receiving IMiD-based therapy was associated with a low incidence of thromboembolic events and an acceptable safety profile. These real-world findings suggest that NOACs may represent a practical and effective alternative to aspirin or LMWH, potentially overcoming the limitations of score-based prophylaxis strategies.