Andrew M. Colclasure

Dr. Andrew M. Colclasure

Energy Conversion and Storage Systems Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 April 2019 in Journal of the Electrochemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Andrew M. ColclasureAndrew M. Colclasure
Andrew M. Colclasure
ADAlison R. Dunlop
Alison R. Dunlop
STStephen Trask
Stephen Trask
BPBryant J. Polzin
Bryant J. Polzin
AJAndrew N. Jansen
Andrew N. Jansen
KSKandler Smith
Kandler Smith
To improve electric vehicle market acceptance, the charge time of their batteries should be reduced to 10–15 minutes. However, achieving 4C to 6C charge rates with today's batteries is only possible for cells with thin electrodes coming at the expense of low energy density and high battery manufacturing cost. An electrochemical model is validated versus high rate charge data for cells with several loadings. The model elucidates that the main limitations for high energy density cells are poor electrolyte transport resulting in salt depletion within the anode and Li plating at the graphite/separator interface. Next, the model is used to understand what future electrode and electrolyte properties can help enable 4C and 6C charging. Ideally, future electrolytes would be identified with 2X conductivity, 3–4X diffusivity, and transference number of 0.5–0.6. Alternatively charging at elevated temperatures enhances electrolyte transport by 1.5X conductivity and 2–3X diffusivity with a negligible effect on transference number. Another effective strategy to enable 4C and 6C charging is reducing electrode tortuosity. Conversely, increasing electrode porosity and negative/positive ratio are ineffective strategies to improve fast charge capability.

8 July 2020 in Energy & Environmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DFDonal Finegan
Donal Finegan
AQAlexander Quinn
Alexander Quinn
DWDavid Wragg
David Wragg
Andrew M. ColclasureAndrew M. Colclasure
Andrew M. Colclasure
XLXuekun Lu
Xuekun Lu
KSKandler Smith
Kandler Smith
The principal inhibitor of fast charging lithium ion cells is the graphite negative electrode, where favorable conditions for lithium plating occur at high charge rates, causing accelerated degradation and safety concerns. The local response of graphite, both at the electrode and particle level, when exposed to fast charging conditions of around 6C is not well understood. Consequently, the conditions that lead to the onset of lithium plating, as well as the local dynamics of lithium plating and stripping, have also remained elusive. Here, we use high-speed (100 Hz) pencil-beam X-ray diffraction to repeatedly raster along the depth of a 101 μm thick graphite electrode in 3 μm steps during fast (up to 6C) charge and discharge conditions. Consecutive depth profiles from separator to current collector were each captured in 0.5 seconds, giving an unprecedented spatial and temporal description of the state of the electrode and graphite's staging dynamics during high rate conditions. The electrode is preferentially activated near the separator, and the non-uniformity increases with rate and is influenced by free-energy barriers between graphite's lithiation stages. The onset of lithium plating and stripping was quantified, occurring only within the first 15 μm from the separator. The presence of lithium plating changed the behavior of the underlying graphite, such as causing co-existence of LiC6 and graphite in the fully discharged state. Finally, the staging behavior of graphite at different rates was quantified, revealing a high dependency on rate and drastic hysteresis between lithiation and delithiation.

2 November 2018 in Journal of the Electrochemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FUFrancois L. E. Usseglio-Viretta
Francois L. E. Usseglio-Viretta
Andrew M. ColclasureAndrew M. Colclasure
Andrew M. Colclasure
AMAashutosh N. Mistry
Aashutosh N. Mistry
KCKoffi Pierre Yao Claver
Koffi Pierre Yao Claver
FPFezzeh Pouraghajan
Fezzeh Pouraghajan
KSKandler Smith
Kandler Smith
Battery performance is strongly correlated with electrode microstructural properties. Of the relevant properties, the tortuosity factor of the electrolyte transport paths through microstructure pores is important as it limits battery maximum charge/discharge rate, particularly for energy-dense thick electrodes. Tortuosity factor however, is difficult to precisely measure, and thus its estimation has been debated frequently in the literature. Herein, three independent approaches have been applied to quantify the tortuosity factor of lithium-ion battery electrodes. The first approach is a microstructure model based on three-dimensional geometries from X-ray computed tomography (CT) and stochastic reconstructions enhanced with computationally generated carbon/binder domain (CBD), as CT is often unable to resolve the CBD. The second approach uses a macro-homogeneous model to fit electrochemical data at several rates, providing a separate estimation of the tortuosity factor. The third approach experimentally measures tortuosity factor via symmetric cells employing a blocking electrolyte. Comparisons have been made across the three approaches for 14 graphite and nickel-manganese-cobalt oxide electrodes. Analysis suggests that if the tortuosity factor were characterized based on the active material skeleton only, the actual tortuosities would be 1.35–1.81 times higher for calendered electrodes. Correlations are provided for varying porosity, CBD phase interfacial arrangement and solid particle morphology.

1 March 2020 in Electrochimica Acta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Andrew M. ColclasureAndrew M. Colclasure
Andrew M. Colclasure
TTTanvir R. Tanim
Tanvir R. Tanim
AJAndrew N. Jansen
Andrew N. Jansen
STStephen E. Trask
Stephen E. Trask
ADAlison R. Dunlop
Alison R. Dunlop
KSKandler Smith
Kandler Smith

1 February 2019 in Electrochimica Acta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XLXuemin Li
Xuemin Li
Andrew M. ColclasureAndrew M. Colclasure
Andrew M. Colclasure
DFDonal P. Finegan
Donal P. Finegan
DRDongsheng Ren
Dongsheng Ren
YSYing Shi
Ying Shi
KSKandler Smith
Kandler Smith

1 December 2011 in Electrochimica Acta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Andrew M. ColclasureAndrew M. Colclasure
Andrew M. Colclasure
KSKandler A. Smith
Kandler A. Smith
RKRobert J. Kee
Robert J. Kee