Elena Bassi

Dr. Elena Bassi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 May 2020 in Ecological Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EBElena Bassi
Elena Bassi
AGAndrea Gazzola
Andrea Gazzola
PBPaolo Bongi
Paolo Bongi
MSMassimo Scandura
Massimo Scandura
MAMarco Apollonio
Marco Apollonio

21 March 2018 in Mammal Study
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBElena Bassi
Elena Bassi
DBDaniele Battocchio
Daniele Battocchio
AMAndrea Marcon
Andrea Marcon
SSSophie Stahlberg
Sophie Stahlberg
MAMarco Apollonio
Marco Apollonio
We investigated the scavenging behavior of some vertebrate species inhabiting a mountainous area of Eastern Tuscany (Italy). Fieldwork was conducted by using camera traps from July 2010 to June 2013. The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) resulted to be the main scavenger species, followed by the wolf (Canis lupus), while the wild boar (Sus scrofa) resulted to be one of the less efficient scavengers, exploiting, in groups, only two carcasses. The wolf seemed to use carcasses mostly during the summer season, while no differences in red fox seasonal use of and visit to carcasses were detected. All the wild scavenger species showed a peak of activity between dusk and dawn, during both summer and winter, likely to minimize human disturbance. The red fox used carcasses whenever available, and in most cases it also was the first species arriving on a new carcass, with a very limited searching time. This paper represents the first Italian study on carrion use by Mediterranean vertebrate communities.

24 May 2023 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMEnrico Merli
Enrico Merli
LMLUCA MATTIOLI
LUCA MATTIOLI
EBElena Bassi
Elena Bassi
PBPaolo Bongi
Paolo Bongi
DBDuccio Berzi
Duccio Berzi
MAMarco Apollonio
Marco Apollonio
We estimated the current size and dynamics of the wolf population in Tuscany and investigated the trends and demographic drivers of population changes. Estimates were obtained by two different approaches: (i) mixed-technique field monitoring (from 2014 to 2016) that found the minimum observed pack number and estimated population size, and (ii) an individual-based model (run by Vortex software v. 10.3.8.0) with demographic inputs derived from a local intensive study area and historic data on population size. Field monitoring showed a minimum population size of 558 wolves (SE = 12.005) in 2016, with a density of 2.74 individuals/100 km2. The population model described an increasing trend with an average annual rate of increase λ = 1.075 (SE = 0.014), an estimated population size of about 882 individuals (SE = 9.397) in 2016, and a density of 4.29 wolves/100 km2. Previously published estimates of wolf population were as low as 56.2% compared to our field monitoring estimation and 34.6% in comparison to our model estimation. We conducted sensitivity tests to analyze the key parameters driving population changes based on juvenile and adult mortality rates, female breeding success, and litter size. Mortality rates played a major role in determining intrinsic growth rate changes, with adult mortality accounting for 62.5% of the total variance explained by the four parameters. Juvenile mortality was responsible for 35.8% of the variance, while female breeding success and litter size had weak or negligible effects. We concluded that reliable estimates of population abundance and a deeper understanding of the role of different demographic parameters in determining population dynamics are crucial to define and carry out appropriate conservation and management strategies to address human–wildlife conflicts.

17 February 2026 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMartina Lazzaroni
Martina Lazzaroni
RBRudy Brogi
Rudy Brogi
FBFrancesca Brivio
Francesca Brivio
EBElena Bassi
Elena Bassi
ABAndrea Boromello
Andrea Boromello
SMSarah Marshall-Pescini
Sarah Marshall-Pescini
Wolves ( Canis lupus ) recolonizing human-dominated landscapes encounter anthropogenic risks and opportunities, but how this shapes their fear of humans is unknown. We tested 185 individually identified wild wolves across 44 locations covering a wide urbanization gradient, exposing them to novel objects and human playbacks. Wolves from more urbanized areas showed reduced fear at first exposure to an object but heightened caution when the object changed, indicating increased attention to environmental changes, rather than uniform fear reduction. By contrast, playbacks of human voices elicited strong fear responses (>80%), regardless of urbanization. However, individuals habituated to both stimuli quickly and at a similar pace, highlighting their rapid learning abilities. Sociality buffered fear, with wolves in groups reacting less fearfully than wolves alone. Results show that wolves are capable of flexibly modulating their behavioral responses to both the risks and opportunities of human-dominated landscapes, which likely underpins their urban success and requires us to rise to the challenge of peaceful coexistence.