Since additive technologies in dentistry are gradually replacing metal casting technology, it is necessary to evaluate new dental constructions intended for the development of removable partial denture frameworks. The aim of this research was to evaluate the microstructure and mechanical properties of 3D-printed, laser-melted and -sintered Co–Cr alloys, and perform a comparative study with Co–Cr castings for the same dental purposes. The experiments were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of samples produced by conventional casting of the Co–Cr alloy. The second group consisted of 3D-printed, laser-melted and -sintered specimens produced from a Co–Cr alloy powder divided into three subgroups, depending on the technological parameters chosen for manufacturing (angle, location and heat treatment). Examination of the microstructure was carried out by classical metallographic sample preparation, using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis. A structural phase analysis was also performed by XRD. The mechanical properties were determined using a standard tensile test. The microstructure observation showed a dendritic character in the case of castings, while in the case of 3D-printed, laser-melted and -sintered Co–Cr alloys, the microstructure was typical for additive technologies. The XRD phase analysis confirmed the presence of Co–Cr phases (ε and γ). The results of the tensile test showed remarkably higher yield and tensile strength values and slightly lower elongation of the 3D-printed, laser-melted and -sintered samples than those produced by conventional casting.

Objectives: To evaluate CIEDE2000/CIELAB differences in color (ΔE₀₀/ΔE_ab), and translucency parameter (ΔTP₀₀/ΔTP_ab), and gloss of gingiva-colored resin-based restorative materials upon staining/aging. Materials and methods: Disc-shaped, 10 mm in diameter, and 2-mm-thick samples (n = 5/group) were made from giomer (Beautifil II gingiva), oligomer-based (crea.lign GUM gel), CAD/CAM polymethyl-methacrylate-based (IvoBase CAD), PMMA-based (ProBase Hot), and dimethacrylate-based (SR Nexco Paste Gingiva). Color and gloss were recording using a benchtop spectrophotometer and gloss meter, respectively, at baseline (T0), and upon staining in coffee or red wine for 60 (T1) and 120 h (T2), or artificial aging of 150 kJ/m² (T1) and 300 kJ/m² (T2). Three-way analysis of variance (materials x staining conditions x time intervals), Tukey’s test (α = 0.05), and Pearson’s correlation test were used in analytical statistics. Results: CIEDE2000 color differences ranged from 1.0 to 4.4 (coffee), 1.5 to 5.3 (wine), and 0.9 to 2.0 after artificial aging, with ΔE₀₀ values being significantly higher for Beautifil than other materials (p < 0.05). ΔTP₀₀ values ranged from 0.2 to 0.7 and were statistically higher upon staining in wine compared to artificial aging (p < 0.05). Gloss values at T0 were 76.7–87.0. Beautifil exhibited the lowest gloss retention (50.8–60.2%) after staining, compared to > 90% of other materials (p < 0.05). ΔE₀₀/ΔE_ab and ΔTP₀₀/ΔTP_ab were positively correlated (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Color, translucency, and gloss changes of gingiva-colored restorative materials were material- and staining/aging-dependent. Generally, wine caused greatest changes in color (with IvoBase CAD being the most color stable) and translucency parameter. All materials except Beautifil gingiva II exhibited staining- and aging-dependent gloss retention greater than 90% for all compared time intervals. Clinical relevance: Optical properties of resin-based gingiva-colored restorative materials depend on material, staining/aging conditions, and exposure time. Certain materials should be avoided in individuals with high consumption of red wine and coffee.

Introduction The objective of this case series report is color matching of the central incisors all-ceramic crowns and determine the color difference between those crowns and contralateral or neighboring intact natural incisor using the ?Eab value from CIELab formula. Case Report The subject of this color assessment was all-ceramic crowns for central incisors for three young female patients. The intact natural incisors were used as the target shade for the all-ceramic crown. After tooth preparation and intraoral scan, everything was done at once, regarding the design of restoration and model. For these cases, we used Ivoclar ZirCAD PRIME multi A1 (Ivoclar, Schaan, Liechtenstein) block. For proper shade mapping polarized picture with grey card for digital calibration is necessary as well as one standard picture for mapping the color effects. For tooth color mapping we used the eLAB software (eLAB Prime, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany). Highest ?Eab value for all three cases was 2.7 or less, which indicates that the color is clinically acceptable, considering acceptability threshold value of less than 2.7 (three-year follow-up confirmed acceptable color appearance. Conclusion Following recommended protocol based on the eLAB software software (eLAB Prime), clinically acceptable color of the all-ceramic crown were obtained.