T cell-mediated hyperinflammatory responses, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), are now well-established toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. As the field of CAR T cells advances, however, there is increasing recognition that hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)-like toxicities following CAR T cell infusion are occurring broadly across patient populations and CAR T cell constructs. Importantly, these HLH-like toxicities are often not as directly associated with CRS and/or its severity as initially described. This emergent toxicity, however ill-defined, is associated with life-threatening complications, creating an urgent need for improved identification and optimal management. With the goal of improving patient outcomes and formulating a framework to characterize and study this HLH-like syndrome, we established an American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy panel composed of experts in primary and secondary HLH, pediatric and adult HLH, infectious disease, rheumatology and hematology, oncology, and cellular therapy. Through this effort, we provide an overview of the underlying biology of classical primary and secondary HLH, explore its relationship with similar manifestations following CAR T cell infusions, and propose the term "immune effector cell-associated HLH-like syndrome (IEC-HS)" to describe this emergent toxicity. We also delineate a framework for identifying IEC-HS and put forward a grading schema that can be used to assess severity and facilitate cross-trial comparisons. Additionally, given the critical need to optimize outcomes for patients experiencing IEC-HS, we provide insight into potential treatment approaches and strategies to optimize supportive care and delineate alternate etiologies that should be considered in a patient presenting with IEC-HS. By collectively defining IEC-HS as a hyperinflammatory toxicity, we can now embark on further study of the pathophysiology underlying this toxicity profile and make strides toward a more comprehensive assessment and treatment approach.

Adoptive cellular immunotherapy using immune cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) has shown promise, particularly for the treatment of hematological malignancies. To date, the majority of clinically evaluated CAR cell products have been derived from autologous immune cells. While this strategy can be effective it also imposes several constraints regarding logistics. This includes i) availability of center to perform leukapheresis, ii) necessity for shipment to and from processing centers, and iii) time requirements for product manufacture and clinical release testing. In addition, previous cytotoxic therapies can negatively impact the effector function of autologous immune cells, which may then affect efficacy and/or durability of resultant CAR products. The use of allogeneic CAR cell products generated using cells from healthy donors has the potential to overcome many of these limitations, including through generation of “off the shelf” products. However, allogeneic CAR cell products come with their own challenges, including potential to induce graft-versus-host-disease, as well as risk of immune-mediated rejection by the host. Here we will review promises and challenges of allogeneic CAR immunotherapies, including those being investigated in preclinical models and/or early phase clinical studies.

Current chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T-cell products are evaluated in bulk, without assessing functional heterogeneity. We therefore generated a comprehensive single-cell gene expression and T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing data set using pre- and postinfusion CD19-CAR T cells from blood and bone marrow samples of pediatric patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. We identified cytotoxic postinfusion cells with identical TCRs to a subset of preinfusion CAR T cells. These effector precursor cells exhibited a unique transcriptional profile compared with other preinfusion cells, corresponding to an unexpected surface phenotype (TIGIT+, CD62Llo, CD27−). Upon stimulation, these cells showed functional superiority and decreased expression of the exhaustion-associated transcription factor TOX. Collectively, these results demonstrate diverse effector potentials within preinfusion CAR T-cell products, which can be exploited for therapeutic applications. Furthermore, we provide an integrative experimental and analytic framework for elucidating the mechanisms underlying effector development in CAR T-cell products. Significance: Utilizing clonal trajectories to define transcriptional potential, we find a unique signature of CAR T-cell effector precursors present in preinfusion cell products. Functional assessment of cells with this signature indicated early effector potential and resistance to exhaustion, consistent with postinfusion cellular patterns observed in patients. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2007

T cells expressing CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptors (CD19-CARs) have potent antileukemia activity in pediatric and adult patients with relapsed and/or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, not all patients achieve a complete response (CR), and a significant percentage relapse after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy due to T-cell intrinsic and/or extrinsic mechanisms. Thus, there is a need to evaluate new CD19-CAR T-cell products in patients to improve efficacy. We developed a phase 1/2 clinical study to evaluate an institutional autologous CD19-CAR T-cell product in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. Here we report the outcome of the phase 1 study participants (n = 12). Treatment was well tolerated, with a low incidence of both cytokine release syndrome (any grade, n = 6) and neurotoxicity (any grade, n = 3). Nine out of 12 patients (75%) achieved a minimal residual disease-negative CR in the bone marrow (BM). High disease burden (≥40% morphologic blasts) before CAR T-cell infusion correlated with increased side effects and lower response rate, but not with CD19-CAR T-cell expansion. After infusion, CD8+ CAR T cells had a proliferative advantage over CD4+ CAR T cells and at peak expansion, had an effector memory phenotype with evidence of antigen-driven differentiation. Patients that proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (AlloHCT) had sustained, durable responses. In summary, the initial evaluation of our institutional CD19-CAR T-cell product demonstrates safety and efficacy while highlighting the impact of pre-infusion disease burden on outcomes. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03573700.