The aim of this study was to provide detailed information concerning clinically relevant occlusal traits and the prevalence of occlusal anomalies in an orthodontically relevant period of dental development. Four hundred and ninety-four German schoolchildren (237 males and 257 females), median age 9 years, were orthodontically examined. Overjet and overbite were measured to the nearest 0.5 mm, and sagittal molar relationships were registered clinically to the nearest quarter unit. In addition, crossbites, scissor bites, and midline displacements were evaluated. Descriptive statistics was complemented by testing gender differences and differences between groups with Class I and Class II anomalies (Mann–Whitney U-test) as well as a statistical evaluation of differences between the three dental stages (Kruskal–Wallis test). Overjet exhibited an extreme range between −2 and 12 mm (median values 3–3.5 mm). An increased overjet was more prevalent than a reduced or reverse overjet, and a severely increased overjet greater than 6 mm was a common finding affecting around 5–10 per cent of the children. Similarly, overbite showed considerable variations of between −1 and 9 mm (medians 3–3.5 mm) and males exhibited a significantly larger overbite than females. In Class II malocclusion subjects, overbite was significantly enlarged (on average between 0.5 and 1 mm) when compared with those with a Class I malocclusion. Traumatic contact of the gingiva affected every 14th child. A Class II molar relationship of three-quarter units or more was a frequent finding affecting more than one child in five. In addition, at 9 years of age, 3 per cent of the children exhibited a Class III molar relationship of at least a half unit. The wide range of orthodontically relevant occlusal traits found in the present study underlines the need for orthodontic screening at 9 years of age (or earlier).

Background: Induced tooth movement during orthodontic therapy requires mechano-induced bone remodeling. Besides various cytokines and growth-factors, neuronal guidance molecules gained attention for their roles in bone homeostasis and thus, potential roles during tooth movement. Several neuronal guidance molecules have been implicated in the regulation of bone remodeling. Amongst them, Semaphorin 3A is particular interesting as it concurrently induces osteoblast differentiation and disturbs osteoclast differentiation. Methods: Mechano-regulation of Sema3A and its receptors PlexinA1 and Neuropilin (RT-qPCR, WB) was evaluated by applying compressive and tension forces to primary human periodontal fibroblasts (hPDLF) and alveolar bone osteoblasts (hOB). The association of the transcription factor Osterix (SP7) and SEMA3A was studied by RT-qPCR. Mechanisms involved in SEMA3A-mediated osteoblast differentiation were assessed by Rac1GTPase pull-downs, β-catenin expression analyses (RT-qPCR) and nuclear translocation assays (IF). Osteogenic markers were analyzed by RT-qPCR. Results: SEMA3A, PLXNA1 and NRP1 were differentially regulated by tension or compressive forces in hPDLF. Osterix (SP7) displayed the same pattern of regulation. Recombinant Sema3A induced the activation of Rac1GTPase, the nuclear translocation of β-catenin and the expression of osteogenic marker genes. Conclusion: Sema3A, its receptors and Osterix are regulated by mechanical forces in hPDLF. SEMA3A upregulation was associated with Osterix (SP7) modulation. Sema3A-enhanced osteogenic marker gene expression in hOB might be dependent on a pathway involving Rac1GTPase and β-catenin. Thus, Semaphorin 3A might contribute to bone remodeling during induced tooth movement.

(1) Background: Novel high-performance polymers for medical 3D printing enable in-office manufacturing of fully customized brackets. Previous studies have investigated clinically relevant parameters such as manufacturing precision, torque transmission, and fracture stability. The aim of this study is to evaluate different design options of the bracket base concerning the adhesive bond between the bracket and tooth, measured as the shear bond strength (SBS) and maximum force (F_max) according to DIN 13990. (2) Methods: Three different designs for printed bracket bases were compared with a conventional metal bracket (C). The following configurations were chosen for the base design: Matching of the base to the anatomy of the tooth surface, size of the cross-sectional area corresponding to the control group (C), and a micro- (A) and macro- (B) retentive design of the base surface. In addition, a group with a micro-retentive base (D) matched to the tooth surface and an increased size was studied. The groups were analyzed for SBS, F_max, and adhesive remnant index (ARI). The Kruskal–Wallis test with a post hoc test (Dunn–Bonferroni) and Mann–Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis (significance level: p < 0.05). (3) Results: The values for SBS and F_max were highest in C (SBS: 12.0 ± 3.8 MPa; F_max: 115.7 ± 36.6 N). For the printed brackets, there were significant differences between A and B (A: SBS 8.8 ± 2.3 MPa, F_max 84.7 ± 21.8 N; B: SBS 12.0 ± 2.1 MPa, F_max 106.5 ± 20.7 N). F_max was significantly different for A and D (D: F_max 118.5 ± 22.8 N). The ARI score was highest for A and lowest for C. (4) Conclusions: This study shows that conventional brackets form a more stable bond with the tooth than the 3D-printed brackets. However, for successful clinical use, the shear bond strength of the printed brackets can be increased with a macro-retentive design and/or enlargement of the base.

Objectives: Accurate description of buccal bone adjacent to mandibular anterior teeth is helpful for planning and monitoring periodontal and orthodontic treatment. Low-dose cone beam computed tomography (LD-CBCT) imaging has shown promising results for very small dental structures in animals. This study asserts that LD-CBCT is sufficiently accurate to measure buccal alveolar bone adjacent to human mandibular anterior teeth. Materials and methods: Buccal bone level adjacent to 16 mandibular anterior teeth from four human cadavers was measured radiographically using one high-dose (HD) CBCT protocol and two LD-CBCT protocols. The resulting radiographic measurements of buccal bone height (bl) and thickness (bt) were compared with reference probe and reflected-light microscopy measurements. Measurement medians and Bland–Altman plots were calculated, and a linear mixed model was used to compare raters and imaging modalities. Results: All regression coefficients were approximately 0, indicating high interrater, intrarater, and intermodality agreement. No significant differences were found between reference measurements and CBCT protocols. The mean differences for bl measurements were 0.07 mm (rater 1 [r1]) and 0.12 mm (rater 2 [r2]) for HD-CBCT; 0.07 mm (r1) and 0.13 mm (r2) for LD-CBCT-1; and 0.02 mm (r1) and 0.01 mm (r2) for LD-CBCT-2. For bt measurements, mean differences were 0.02 mm (r1) and 0.02 mm (r2) for HD-CBCT; 0.01 mm (r1) and 0.01 mm (r2) for LD-CBCT-1; and 0.00 mm (r1) and 0.01 mm (r2) for LD-CBCT-2. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, LD-CBCT seems to be a precise method for describing buccal bone and its thickness adjacent to mandibular anterior teeth in this experimental setting. Clinical relevance: For the first time, this study showed LD-CBCT produces excellent results and is a reliable modality for imaging buccal bone in vitro. If clinical studies confirm these results, LD-CBCT could enable better treatment planning and monitoring at a radiation dose that is far lower than that of conventional HD-CBCT but similar to that of panoramic views.

Objectives: New CBCT devices have been developed which can provide “low-dose CBCTs (LD-CBCT)”. Aim of this study is to investigate the suitability of LD-CBCT for measurement of alveolar buccal/oral bone. Methods and materials: Vestibular and oral bone loss of the teeth of seven porcine mandibles free of soft tissues were investigated by Micro-CT and three CBCT-modes: high-dose (HD), standard-dose (SD) and low-dose (LD). Radiographic measurements of bone loss (bl) and vestibular and oral bone thickness (bt) were made by two raters at 69 sites. Measurement means and differences, Intraclass correlation (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots were calculated. Results: ICCs between raters(r) concerning bl were 0.954 for HD, 0.949 for SD and 0.945 for LD; concerning bt they were 0.872 for HD, 0.845 for SD and 0.783 for LD. Means of differences of bt measurements were −0.01 mm(r1)/0.00 mm(r2) for HD, 0.04 mm(r1)/0.02 mm(r2) for SD and 0.02 mm(r1)/0.04 mm(r2) for LD; for bl measurements they were 0.06 mm(r1)/0.05 mm(r2) for HD, −0.01 mm(r1)/0.13 mm(r2) for SD and 0.07 mm(r1)/0.16 mm(r2) for LD. Linear regression indicates no noticeable differences between methods and the raters with respect to bl and bt. Conclusions: Relating to the CBCT-device used in this study, LD-CBCT is a promising method to detect and describe buccal and oral periodontal bl and bt. Further studies with human anatomic structures must confirm these results.

Purpose: Ideal treatment timing in orthodontics is controversially discussed depending on the type and extent of the dysgnathia and malocclusion present, especially with regard to efficiency, patient burden and treatment efforts of early compared to regular or late treatment. This German clinical practice guideline aims to clarify, at which time points an orthodontic anomaly can be effectively treated and how treatment efficiency differs depending on treatment timing. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in various guideline databases and databases PROSPERO, MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform according to a predefined PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes with added qualitative search terms) search algorithm and strategy. Appraisal of scientific evidence of the individual studies checked for eligibility was carried out according to SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network), AMSTAR II (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systemic Reviews), and AXIS (Appraisal Tool to Assess the Quality of Cross-sectional Studies) tools. Only controlled studies with a high, acceptable or moderate quality (and thus an acceptable risk of bias) were considered. Results: A total of 309 studies of over 11,000 sources screened were identified to be eligible for inclusion and critically appraised for study quality and risk-of-bias. No relevant guidelines relating to the aims of the present guideline were found. Elected delegates of in total 21 German scientific societies and organizations agreed upon a total of 19 evidence-based statements and recommendations based on a nominal consensus process. Conclusions: Although most malocclusions can be effectively treated both in the early, late mixed, and permanent dentition, evidence suggests that therapy of a pronounced skeletal or dental class II anomaly can be started early to reduce the risk of dental anterior tooth trauma, whereas in a moderate class II anomaly, therapy can preferably be carried out before or during the pubertal growth peak. Therapy of a skeletal or dental class III anomaly should be started early, as this also reduces the need for later surgery to correct the anomaly. The treatment of a pronounced skeletal or dental transverse anomaly should be started early in the upper jaw in order to utilize the high adaptivity of the maxillary structures in young patients.