The diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with cancer constitutes a therapeutic challenge. We aimed to assess the clinical presentation and management of ACS as well as 1-year survival in patients hospitalized for cancer.This retrospective study included patients hospitalized between 2012 and 2018 in a nonacademic center. The inclusion criteria were diagnosis of active cancer and ACS recognized using standard criteria. Patients were assessed with respect to invasive or conservative ACS strategy. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality during 1-year follow-up.We screened 25,165 patients, of whom 36 (0.14%) had ACS (mean [SD] age, 71.9 [9.8] years). The most common presentation was non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (61% of patients). Coronary angiography was performed in 47% of patients, while 53% were treated conservatively. Overall, the primary endpoint occurred in 67% of patients and secondary endpoint in 28% during follow-up. The predictors of better outcome in a univariate analysis were invasive strategy, lack of metastases, aspirin use, and no cardiogenic shock. Invasive treatment and aspirin use remained significant predictors of better survival when adjusted for the presence of metastases (hazard ratio [HR] 0.37, confidence interval [CI] 0.15–0.92 and HR 0.39, CI 0.16–0.94, respectively) and ineligibility for cancer treatment (HR 0.37, CI 0.15–0.93 and HR 0.30, CI 0.12–0.73, respectively).The incidence of ACS in cancer patients is low but 1-year mortality rates are high. Guideline-recommended management was frequently underused. Our results suggest that invasive approach and aspirin use are associated with better survival regardless of cancer stage and eligibility for cancer treatment.
Background: Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is associated with a higher risk of mortality in the general population; however, it has not been studied in the cancer population. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of OH in cancer patients compared to that in the noncancer population. Methods: A total of 411 patients (mean age 63.5 ± 10.6 years) were recruited: patients with active cancer (n = 223) and patients hospitalised for other reasons, but without a cancer diagnosis (n = 188). Medical histories were collected and an orthostatic challenge test was performed. OH was defined as a blood pressure (BP) decrease upon standing of ≥20 mmHg for the systolic or ≥10 mmHg for the diastolic BP after 1 or 3 min; or a systolic BP decrease <90 mmHg. Results: The prevalence of OH in the subjects with cancer was significantly higher than in the subjects without cancer (28.7% vs. 16.5%, respectively, p = 0.003). OH was the most common in the lung cancer patients (57.5%). In a single-variable analysis, the predictors of OH were cancer presence, age ≥ 65 years, and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2. In the multivariable model, the strongest independent predictor of OH was cancer status, which doubled the risk of OH, and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and diabetes. Conclusions: Cancer patients are characterised by a high prevalence of OH. In this population, the recommendation of routine orthostatic challenge tests should be considered.
6 June 2019 in Polish Archives of Internal Medicine
INTRODUCTION Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmia (VA) that originates from the aortic cusps can be challenging. Data on long-term efficacy and safety as well as optimal technique after aortic cusp ablation have not previously been reported. OBJECTIVES This aim of the study was to determine the short- and long-term outcomes after RFA of aortic cusp VA, and to evaluate aortic valve injuries according to echocardiographic screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a prospective multicenter registry (AVATAR, Aortic Cusp Ventricular Arrhythmias: Long Term Safety and Outcome from a Multicenter Prospective Ablation Registry) study. A total of 103 patients at a mean age of 56 years (34-64) from the "Electra" Registry (2005-2017) undergoing RFA of aortic cusps VA were enrolled. The following 3 ablation techniques were used: zero-fluoroscopy (ZF; electroanatomical mapping [EAM] without fluoroscopy), EAM with fluoroscopy, and conventional fluoroscopy-based RFA. Data on clinical history, complications after RFA, echocardiography, and 24-hour Holter monitoring were collected. The follow-up was 12 months or longer. RESULTS There were no major acute cardiac complications after RFA. In one case, a vascular access complication required surgery. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) procedure time was 75 minutes (IQR, 58-95), median follow-up, 32 months (IQR, 12-70). Acute and long-term procedural success rates were 93% and 86%, respectively. The long-term RFA outcomes were observed in ZF technique (88%), EAM with fluoroscopy (86%), and conventional RFA (82%), without differences. During long-term follow-up, no abnormalities were found within the aortic root. CONCLUSIONS Ablation of VA within the aortic cusps is safe and effective in long-term follow-up. The ZF approach is feasible, although it requires greater expertise and more imaging modalities.
Aims: Ablation procedures for the treatment of atrial fibrillation lead to changes in autonomic heart control; however, there are insufficient data on the possible association of these changes with atrial fibrillation recurrence. The study aim was to assess the effects of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) on cardiac autonomic modulation and atrial fibrillation recurrence. Methods: We screened 52 patients with atrial fibrillation referred for PVI, of whom 20 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria, and were enrolled in the study and followed over 6 months. Beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring was performed 1–2 days before PVI, 1 and 6 months after PVI. We estimated pulse interval variability and spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) both in the time and frequency domains, and performed the Valsalva manoeuvre assessing the Valsalva ratio. Results: During 6 months after PVI, atrial fibrillation recurrence was observed in six patients. One month after PVI, pulse interval variability and BRS (sequence method) significantly decreased in all patients, returning to preintervention values by 6 months. Patients without atrial fibrillation recurrence at 1 month showed a transient reduction in pulse interval variability (frequency domain) and in BRS (both methods) in contrast to those with atrial fibrillation recurrence. A significant decrease in the Valsalva ratio observed at 1 month was maintained at 6 months after PVI in both groups. Conclusion: Successful PVI may lead to transient autonomic alterations reflected by a reduction in pulse interval variability and BRS, with more prolonged changes in the Valsalva ratio. The efficacy of PVI in preventing atrial fibrillation recurrence seems to be related to transient parasympathetic atrial denervation.
28 October 2021 in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Complete elimination of fluoroscopy during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (IVAs) originating from the aortic sinus cusp (ASC) is challenging. The aim was to assess the feasibility, safety and a learning curve for a zero-fluoroscopy (ZF) approach in centers using near-zero fluoroscopy (NOX) approach in IVA-ASC. Between 2012 and 2018, we retrospectively enrolled 104 IVA-ASC patients referred for ZF RFA or NOX using a 3-dimensional electroanatomic (3D-EAM) system (Ensite, Velocity, Abbott, USA). Acute, short and long-term outcomes and learning curve for the ZF were evaluated. ZF was completed in 62 of 75 cases (83%) and NOX in 32 of 32 cases (100%). In 13 cases ZF was changed to NOX. No significant differences were found in success rates between ZF and NOX, no major complications were noted. The median procedure and fluoroscopy times were 65.0 [45–81] and 0.0 [0–5] min respectively, being shorter for ZF than for NOX. With growing experience, the preference for ZF significantly increased—43% (23/54) in 2012–2016 vs 98% (52/53) in 2017–2018, with a simultaneous reduction in the procedure time. ZF ablation can be completed in almost all patients with IVA-ASC by operators with previous experience in the NOX approach, and after appropriate training, it was a preferred ablation technique. The ZF approach for IVA-ASC guided by 3D-EAM has a similar feasibility, safety, and effectiveness to the NOX approach.
Despite spectacular progress in the treatment of patients diagnosed with cancer, cardiovascular diseases are the second leading cause of death in cancer patients, after cancer itself. According to the CONNECT-POL registry, cardiovascular risk factors are very often detected in cancer patients even before starting oncological treatment. The rapidly expanding range of new life-saving cancer therapies unfortunately is characterized by a wide range of both early and late cardiovascular complications. These include not only the classic complications long described as heart failure, but also hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and accelerated atherosclerosis. Preventive strategies aimed at their prevention and optimal treatment are crucial for improving both oncological and cardiological prognosis. Unfortunately, as is widely known, the presence of cancer negatively impacts the quality and intensity of preventive measures. In our expert opinion, after a cancer diagnosis, in addition to promptly initiating oncological therapy, prevention or addressing existing cardiovascular risk factors is also of great importance for the patient's further treatment and prognosis. This should generally be done in accordance with the principles adopted for the general population, but with certain differences for cancer patients, especially if this is a group of patients with advanced cancer. It is crucial that these activities are not conducted solely by cardiologists, but also with the support of primary care physicians and other specialties, including oncologists, with the full cooperation and acceptance of the patient. According to the authors of this document, there is a need to emphasize the role of primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in cancer patients, which has been neglected until now, and our expert opinion summarizes these recommendations.