Peptic ulcer is a chronic disease affecting up to 10% of the world’s population. The formation of peptic ulcers depends on the presence of gastric juice pH and the decrease in mucosal defenses. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection are the two major factors disrupting the mucosal resistance to injury. Conventional treatments of peptic ulcers, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2 (H2) receptor antagonists, have demonstrated adverse effects, relapses, and various drug interactions. On the other hand, medicinal plants and their chemical compounds are useful in the prevention and treatment of numerous diseases. Hence, this review presents common medicinal plants that may be used for the treatment or prevention of peptic ulcers.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been shown to improve glucose and lipid homeostasis, promote weight loss, and reduce cardiovascular risk factors. They are a promising therapeutic option for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the most common liver disease, associated with T2DM, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. GLP-1RAs have been approved for the treatment of T2DM and obesity, but not for NAFLD. Most recent clinical trials have suggested the importance of early pharmacologic intervention with GLP-1RAs in alleviating and limiting NAFLD, as well as highlighting the relative scarcity of in vitro studies on semaglutide, indicating the need for further research. However, extra-hepatic factors contribute to the GLP-1RA results of in vivo studies. Cell culture models of NAFLD can be helpful in eliminating extrahepatic effects on the alleviation of hepatic steatosis, modulation of lipid metabolism pathways, reduction of inflammation, and prevention of the progression of NAFLD to severe hepatic conditions. In this review article, we discuss the role of GLP-1 and GLP-1RA in the treatment of NAFLD using human hepatocyte models.

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and HCC-related deaths has increased over the last few decades. There are several risk factors of HCC such as viral hepatitis (B, C), cirrhosis, tobacco and alcohol use, aflatoxin-contaminated food, pesticides, diabetes, obesity, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and metabolic and genetic diseases. Diagnosis of HCC is based on different methods such as imaging ultrasonography (US), multiphasic enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and several diagnostic biomarkers. In this review, we examine the epidemiology of HCC worldwide and in Egypt as well as risk factors associated with the development of HCC and, finally, provide the updated diagnostic biomarkers for the diagnosis of HCC, particularly in the early stages of HCC. Several biomarkers are considered to diagnose HCC, including downregulated or upregulated protein markers secreted during HCC development, circulating nucleic acids or cells, metabolites, and the promising, recently identified biomarkers based on quantitative proteomics through the isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ). In addition, a diagnostic model used to improve the sensitivity of combined biomarkers for the diagnosis of early HCC is discussed.

BACKGROUND: The emergence of novel viruses poses severe challenges to global public health highlighting the crucial necessity for new antivirals. MAIN BODY: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are immunoglobulins that bind to a single epitope. Mouse mAbs are generated by classic hybridoma technology and are mainly used for immunodiagnostics. For immunotherapy, it is critical to use monoclonal antibodies in their human form to minimize adverse reactions. They have been successfully used to treat numerous illnesses, accordingly, an increasing number of mAbs, with high potency against emerging viruses is the target of every biopharmaceutical company. The diagnostic and therapeutic mAbs market grows rapidly into a multi-billion-dollar business. Biopharmaceuticals are innovative resolutions which revolutionized the treatment of significant chronic diseases and malignancies. Currently, a variety of therapeutic options that include antiviral medications, monoclonal antibodies, and immunomodulatory agents are available for the management of COVID-19. SHORT CONCLUSION: The invasion of mAbs in new medical sectors will increase the market magnitude as it is expected to generate revenue of about 300 billion $ by 2025. In the current mini-review, the applications of monoclonal antibodies in immune-diagnosis and immunotherapy will be demonstrated, particularly for COVID-19 infection and will focus mainly on monoclonal antibodies in the market.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and its progressive form, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), represent a growing global health problem linked to obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia. MASLD often leads to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Currently, therapeutic options are limited, emphasizing the need for novel, targeted pharmacological interventions. Resmetirom, a selective thyroid hormone receptor beta (THR-β) agonist, offers a promising approach by specifically enhancing hepatic metabolism while minimizing systemic effects. Clinical trials have demonstrated its capacity to reduce hepatic triglyceride accumulation and improve lipid profiles. Early- and advanced-phase studies, including the MAESTRO program, highlight significant reductions in hepatic fat content and favorable impacts on noninvasive biomarkers of fibrosis with minimal side effects. This review highlights evidence from pivotal studies, explores resmetirom’s mechanism of action, and compares its efficacy and safety with other emerging therapeutic agents. While resmetirom marks a breakthrough in non-cirrhotic MASH management, further long-term studies are essential to fully evaluate its clinical benefits and potential regulatory approval for broader use in MASLD and MASH.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an ongoing phenomenon. It is a significant public health issue that has existed long before the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. It develops as microorganisms undergo genetic mutations that allow them to survive despite antimicrobial treatment. This process is highly associated with excessive and often unnecessary antimicrobial pharmacotherapy, which was often discussed during the COVID-19 pandemic. This article explores how the pandemic has affected antimicrobial stewardship by shifting the focus away from antimicrobial resistance, as well as the impact of enhanced antibiotic usage and measures such as lockdowns, mandatory testing and vaccination on antimicrobial resistance. Although these measures were regarded as successful in terms of limiting the pandemic, they have significantly contributed to an already escalating AMR issue. Outpatient methods in primary care and intensive care units aiming to prevent severe COVID-19 disease have contributed to the spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria, while laboratories burdened with COVID-19 testing have indirectly interrupted the detection of these bacteria. In this review, we summarize the pathogens whose AMRe has been greatly affected by COVID-19 measures and emphasize the importance of efficient antimicrobial stewardship in future pandemic and non-pandemic states to promote the responsible use of antibiotics and minimize AMR.