The purpose of the research was to identify the impact of peripheral (unilateral and bilateral) vision on manual reaction time to visual stimuli in handball, basketball and volleyball players by implementing a 6-week experimental program of specific exercises and some adapted tests using Fitlight technology. The research included 412 players (212 male—51.5%; 200 female—48.5%) from three team sports: basketball—146 (35.4%), handball—140 (40%) and volleyball—126 (30.6%). The experimental program carried out over 6 weeks was identical for all handball, basketball and volleyball players participating in the study; two training sessions per week were performed, with each session lasting 30 min; 15 exercises were used for the improvement of manual reaction time to visual stimuli involving peripheral vision. Through the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), we identified statistically significant differences between the arithmetic means of the samples of handball, basketball and volleyball players, as well as according to general samples also of gender (male and female), p = 0.000. Male and female handball samples achieved the greatest progress in manual reaction time to visual stimuli involving peripheral vision for the Reaction time test with a unilateral right visual stimulus (30 s) and the Reaction time test with a unilateral left visual stimulus (30 s), while general sample also of male and female basketball samples, for the Reaction time test with bilateral visual stimuli (30 s) and the Reaction time test with six Fitlights (1 min); male and female volleyball samples recorded the lowest progress in all tests compared to handball and basketball groups. According to our results, female samples made greater progress in reaction time than male groups for all four tests of the present study. The implemented experimental program led to an improvement in manual reaction time to visual stimuli due to the use of Fitlight technology and the involvement of peripheral vision for all research samples.

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of jump rope training on cardiovascular capacity, assessed with the Ruffier test, and muscular strength, measured using isometric dynamometry (BioFET Mustec, Almere, The Netherlands), within a university physical education program. A total of 52 undergraduate students from non-specialist faculties at the University of Oradea were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (EG) or a control group (CG). Over eight weeks, the EG performed a ten-minute jump rope training session once per week in combination with cardiovascular exercises, while the CG participated only in cardiovascular exercises. Statistical analyses revealed a significant group effect on cardiovascular response (Ruffier Index: p = 0.019; Cohen’s d = −0.271) and a substantial increase in right lower limb strength (p = 0.003; d = 1.026) in the EG compared to the CG. Furthermore, improvements were observed in upper limb strength (left arm: p = 0.010; d = 0.922) and left lower limb strength (p = 0.027; d = 0.779). These findings suggest that incorporating jump rope training into university physical education classes may represent an effective and low-cost strategy to enhance both cardiovascular efficiency and muscular strength in young adults. Given its simplicity and affordability, jump rope training appears feasible for implementation in schools and universities, even where resources are limited. Future research should investigate its long-term effects across different populations.

Background/Objectives: Knee injuries and overuse-related disorders are common among athletes participating in jumping sports such as handball and basketball. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography is increasingly used for the assessment of knee pathology; however, evidence regarding the prevalence and clinical relevance of ultrasonographic abnormalities in young athletes remains limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of ultrasonographic knee abnormalities in young male handball and basketball athletes and to examine their association with pain intensity. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted between June 2025 and June 2026 and included 69 competitive male athletes (35 handball players and 34 basketball players). All participants underwent bilateral knee ultrasonographic examination using a standardized assessment protocol and completed a questionnaire regarding demographic and training characteristics. Knee pain intensity was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Comparisons between sports were performed using χ² and t-tests, while associations between participant-level ultrasonographic findings and pain were evaluated using independent-samples t-tests (or Mann–Whitney U tests, as appropriate), with Cohen’s d effect sizes and exploratory multivariable linear regression. Sensitivity analyses stratified by sport were additionally performed. Results: Patellar tendinopathy was the most prevalent ultrasonographic abnormality (21.0%), followed by medial meniscal abnormality (15.9%) and infrapatellar bursitis (13.0%). Athletes with patellar tendinopathy, medial meniscal abnormality, or infrapatellar bursitis had significantly higher VAS pain scores than athletes without the corresponding ultrasonographic abnormality. Patellar tendinopathy demonstrated the strongest association with participant-reported pain (VAS: 4.1 ± 1.3; Cohen’s d = 1.24; p < 0.001). Handball athletes exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of patellar tendinopathy than basketball athletes (34.3% vs. 11.8%; OR = 3.90, 95% CI: 1.09–13.95; p = 0.027). In multivariable regression analysis adjusted for age, BMI, sport type, previous knee injury, and weekly training volume, patellar tendinopathy (β = 1.34, p < 0.001), medial meniscal abnormality (β = 0.70, p = 0.017), and infrapatellar bursitis (β = 0.54, p = 0.046) remained independently associated with higher pain scores. The regression model explained 39% of the variance in VAS pain scores (R² = 0.39). Conclusions: Ultrasonographic knee abnormalities are common among young male handball and basketball athletes and are significantly associated with pain intensity. Because ultrasonography has limited ability to characterize intra-articular pathology, particularly the menisci, the ultrasonographic abnormalities identified in this study should not be interpreted as definitive diagnoses, and MRI remains the reference imaging modality when comprehensive evaluation of intra-articular pathology is clinically indicated. Patellar tendinopathy was the most prevalent ultrasonographic abnormality and was most strongly associated with pain intensity. These findings support the use of musculoskeletal ultrasonography as a complementary imaging modality alongside clinical assessment in the evaluation of symptomatic athletes. However, prospective longitudinal studies are required to determine whether these ultrasonographic abnormalities have prognostic value for future pain, functional limitation, or time-loss injury.

Background: Acute low back pain is a highly prevalent musculoskeletal condition and a major cause of pain related functional limitation. Exercise based rehabilitation is commonly recommended, with the McKenzie and Williams methods being among the most frequently used approaches. However, direct comparative evidence between these two exercise protocols remains limited. Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of McKenzie and Williams exercises in reducing pain in patients with acute low back pain during a 30-day intervention period. Results: A single blind, parallel group randomized controlled trial was conducted on 28 patients with acute low back pain, randomly assigned to a McKenzie group or a Williams group, with 14 participants in each group. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale before and after treatment. Both groups showed significant reductions in pain after the intervention. In the McKenzie group, mean pain scores decreased from 8.29 ± 0.91 to 5.43 ± 1.65, whereas in the Williams group they decreased from 8.29 ± 0.83 to 7.07 ± 1.00. The reduction in pain was significantly greater in the McKenzie group. Conclusions: Both exercise protocols were effective in reducing pain in patients with acute low back pain. However, the McKenzie method produced greater short term pain relief and may represent a more effective rehabilitation strategy in this population.