Progressive collapse of building structures induced by accidental extreme loads has garnered significant attention. This study aimed to assess the impact resistance of steel-framed subassemblies with extended reverse channel connections under falling debris impact. It also sought to provide technical support for anti-collapse design. Drop-hammer impact tests were conducted to obtain baseline data. A validated finite element model using ANSYS/LS-DYNA was employed for the parametric analyses. The key parameters investigated included the impact location (mid-span vs. beam end), falling height of the impactor, and span-to-depth ratio of steel beams, with a focus on the impact resistance. The results reveal that the impact resistance depends on both the peak load capacity and the deformation capacity. The mid-span impacts exhibited higher resistance at falling heights ≥ 1.0 m due to greater plastic deformation. In contrast, the beam-end impacts performed better when the falling heights were ≤0.5 m. The impact resistance decreased with an increasing falling height. The reduction ratios exceeded the theoretical values due to the post-impact gravitational energy input. Smaller SDRs enhanced the peak resistance under both impact scenarios, with more pronounced effects in the mid-span cases. Catenary action significantly improved the mid-span impact resistance (19.3–66.7%). However, it contributed minimally to the beam-end impact resistance (0.61–1.09%), where shear action dominated. These findings offer critical technical support for optimizing steel structure designs to resist falling debris impact and enhance overall structural robustness.

Falling debris impact from damaged upper structures is a key cause of building progressive collapse, yet relevant research lags behind that on column removal scenarios. This study uses ANSYS/LS-DYNA 16.0 to simulate the dynamic responses of steel-framed subassemblies with five typical beam–column connections under debris impact, with the finite element model validated by drop hammer tests and showing good agreement with the experimental results. Parametric analyses are conducted to explore the effects of the impact velocity, impactor mass, impact energy, and horizontal restraint on structural responses. The results show that under the same impact energy, the velocity and mass significantly affect the maximum impact force but barely the stable-stage force and maximum displacement; horizontal restraint exerts negligible effects at a low impact energy while a single horizontal restraint markedly impairs impact resistance at high energy. These findings are clarified via energy conservation, momentum theorem, and anti-collapse mechanisms. The study’s originality lies in systematically investigating the dynamic responses of the five subassemblies, deriving quantitative relationships between the impact parameters and impact force, duration, and horizontal restraint. It provides theoretical and technical support for anti-progressive collapse building design.

Owing to their lightness, high strength, flexibility, and design adaptability, cables have been extensively employed in architectural engineering. As cables are primary load-bearing components in long-span spatial structures, a profound understanding of their mechanical behavior is essential for structural design and safety evaluation. This paper presents a systematic review of the physical and mechanical properties of cables commonly used in building structures, offering reference data for key performance indicators. The mechanical responses and influencing factors pertaining to major types of cables—such as semi-parallel wire strand (SPWS), Galfan-coated steel strand (GSS), and full-locked coil wire rope (LCR)—are thoroughly examined. This review covers five critical aspects: fundamental cable characteristics, stress relaxation and creep, mechanical performance under high temperatures, corrosion-induced degradation, and post-fracture behavior after fatigue-induced wire breaks. It identifies key mechanical parameters, including elastic modulus, axial stiffness, bending stiffness, and the coefficient of thermal expansion. The degradation behavior of cables under high-temperature and corrosive conditions is examined, highlighting the superior corrosion resistance of LCR and GSS. Furthermore, the redistribution of stress and residual capacity after the rupturing of steel wires is elucidated. Based on recent studies, prospective directions are suggested to address current knowledge gaps and advance design strategies focused on durability and performance for forthcoming cable-supported structures.