The CRB600H reinforcement is a new type of cold-rolled ribbed steel bar, which has the advantages of green and low carbon, stable quality, saving precious metal resources and so on. In order to study the axial compression performance of short concrete columns with CRB600H stirrups, the finite element analysis model of high-strength reinforced concrete stub columns was established by using ABAQUS, and the accuracy of the finite element model was verified by literature experiments. The effects of stirrup construction (Type A, B and C), stirrup spacing and concrete strength on the axial compressive bearing capacity and ductility of concrete columns with CRB600H stirrups were analyzed and compared with HRB400 stirrups columns. The results showed that the peak bearing capacity of the specimens with CRB600H stirrups was similar to that with HRB400 stirrups, and the ductility of the specimens was improved with CRB600H stirrup. Compared with the type A stirrup and type C stirrup, the type B stirrup had the best concrete restraining effect, and the ductility and peak bearing capacity of the specimens were higher. With a decrease in the stirrup spacing, the ductility and peak bearing capacity of the specimens increased. With an increase in concrete strength, the peak bearing capacity increases, but the ductility decreases. Through parameter analysis, a formula for calculating the axial bearing capacity of 600 MPa high-strength stirrup concrete stub columns based on the effective confinement index (k_eλ_t) was proposed. It is suggested that the equivalent volume of a HRB400 stirrup can be replaced by a CRB600H stirrup in the actual project. At the same time, when the high-strength stirrup was used, the restraining effect of the stirrup on concrete should be considered in the calculation of the axial compression bearing capacity.

Progressive collapse of building structures induced by accidental extreme loads has garnered significant attention. This study aimed to assess the impact resistance of steel-framed subassemblies with extended reverse channel connections under falling debris impact. It also sought to provide technical support for anti-collapse design. Drop-hammer impact tests were conducted to obtain baseline data. A validated finite element model using ANSYS/LS-DYNA was employed for the parametric analyses. The key parameters investigated included the impact location (mid-span vs. beam end), falling height of the impactor, and span-to-depth ratio of steel beams, with a focus on the impact resistance. The results reveal that the impact resistance depends on both the peak load capacity and the deformation capacity. The mid-span impacts exhibited higher resistance at falling heights ≥ 1.0 m due to greater plastic deformation. In contrast, the beam-end impacts performed better when the falling heights were ≤0.5 m. The impact resistance decreased with an increasing falling height. The reduction ratios exceeded the theoretical values due to the post-impact gravitational energy input. Smaller SDRs enhanced the peak resistance under both impact scenarios, with more pronounced effects in the mid-span cases. Catenary action significantly improved the mid-span impact resistance (19.3–66.7%). However, it contributed minimally to the beam-end impact resistance (0.61–1.09%), where shear action dominated. These findings offer critical technical support for optimizing steel structure designs to resist falling debris impact and enhance overall structural robustness.

Falling debris impact from damaged upper structures is a key cause of building progressive collapse, yet relevant research lags behind that on column removal scenarios. This study uses ANSYS/LS-DYNA 16.0 to simulate the dynamic responses of steel-framed subassemblies with five typical beam–column connections under debris impact, with the finite element model validated by drop hammer tests and showing good agreement with the experimental results. Parametric analyses are conducted to explore the effects of the impact velocity, impactor mass, impact energy, and horizontal restraint on structural responses. The results show that under the same impact energy, the velocity and mass significantly affect the maximum impact force but barely the stable-stage force and maximum displacement; horizontal restraint exerts negligible effects at a low impact energy while a single horizontal restraint markedly impairs impact resistance at high energy. These findings are clarified via energy conservation, momentum theorem, and anti-collapse mechanisms. The study’s originality lies in systematically investigating the dynamic responses of the five subassemblies, deriving quantitative relationships between the impact parameters and impact force, duration, and horizontal restraint. It provides theoretical and technical support for anti-progressive collapse building design.