Carlos Corassin

Dr. Carlos Corassin

Department of Food Engeneering, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo. Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, CEP 13635-900, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2016 in Food Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FCFernanda Bovo Campagnollo
Fernanda Bovo Campagnollo
KGKarina C. Ganev
Karina C. Ganev
AKAmin Mousavi Khaneghah
Amin Mousavi Khaneghah
JPJéssica B. Portela
Jéssica B. Portela
ACAdriano Gomes da Cruz
Adriano Gomes da Cruz
ASAnderson S. Sant'ANa
Anderson S. Sant'ANa

12 November 2013 in Toxin Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMayra Carraro Di Gregorio
Mayra Carraro Di Gregorio
DNDiane Valganon De Neeff
Diane Valganon De Neeff
AJAlessandra Vincenzi Jager
Alessandra Vincenzi Jager
CCCarlos Corassin
Carlos Corassin
ÁCÁgatha Cristina De Pinho Carão
Ágatha Cristina De Pinho Carão
Carlos Augusto Fernandes de OliveiraCarlos Augusto Fernandes de Oliveira
Carlos Augusto Fernandes de Oliveira
Mycotoxins are toxic metabolites produced by several fungi species, with the aflatoxins, fumonisins, zearalenone, trichothecenes and ochratoxin A being the most important found in feedstuffs. The economic impact caused by mycotoxins motivated the investigation of detoxification strategies to reduce its bioavailability by enterosorption. Although there are several types of adsorbents, the efficiency of the adsorption depends on the physical and chemical characteristics of both the adsorbent and the mycotoxin. This review describes the most important types of mineral adsorbents [aluminosilicates, HSCAS, bentonites (montmorillonites), zeolites, sepiolite, diatomite and activated carbons] used in feeds, especially for poultry and pigs, and their adsorption mechanisms.


1 January 2013 in Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSueli Cusato
Sueli Cusato
AGAugusto H. Gameiro
Augusto H. Gameiro
CCCarlos Corassin
Carlos Corassin
ASAnderson S. Sant'ANa
Anderson S. Sant'ANa
ACAdriano Gomes da Cruz
Adriano Gomes da Cruz
Carlos Augusto Fernandes de OliveiraCarlos Augusto Fernandes de Oliveira
Carlos Augusto Fernandes de Oliveira
The present study describes the implementation of a food safety system in a dairy processing plant located in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, and the challenges found during the process. In addition, microbiological indicators have been used to assess system's implementation performance. The steps involved in the implementation of a food safety system included a diagnosis of the prerequisites, implementation of the good manufacturing practices (GMPs), sanitation standard operating procedures (SSOPs), training of the food handlers, and hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP). In the initial diagnosis, conformity with 70.7% (n=106) of the items analyzed was observed. A total of 12 critical control points (CCPs) were identified: (1) reception of the raw milk, (2) storage of the raw milk, (3 and 4) reception of the ingredients and packaging, (5) milk pasteurization, (6 and 7) fermentation and cooling, (8) addition of ingredients, (9) filling, (10) storage of the finished product, (11) dispatching of the product, and (12) sanitization of the equipment. After implementation of the food safety system, a significant reduction in the yeast and mold count was observed (p<0.05). The main difficulties encountered for the implementation of food safety system were related to the implementation of actions established in the flow chart and to the need for constant training/adherence of the workers to the system. Despite this, the implementation of the food safety system was shown to be challenging, but feasible to be reached by small-scale food industries.

11 January 2012 in Food and Bioprocess Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FBFernanda Bovo
Fernanda Bovo
CCCarlos Corassin
Carlos Corassin
RRRoice Rosim
Roice Rosim
Carlos Augusto Fernandes de OliveiraCarlos Augusto Fernandes de Oliveira
Carlos Augusto Fernandes de Oliveira

1 March 2016 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLS.H.I. Lee
S.H.I. Lee
LCL.P. Cappato
L.P. Cappato
CCCarlos Corassin
Carlos Corassin
ACAdriano Gomes da Cruz
Adriano Gomes da Cruz
Carlos Augusto Fernandes de OliveiraCarlos Augusto Fernandes de Oliveira
Carlos Augusto Fernandes de Oliveira
This research investigated the removal of adherent cells of 4 strains of Staphylococcus aureus and 1 Listeria monocytogenes strain (previously isolated from dairy plants) from polystyrene microtiter plates using peracetic acid (PAA, 0.5%) for 15, 30, 60, and 120 s, and the inactivation of biofilms formed by those strains on stainless steel coupons using the same treatment times. In the microtiter plates, PAA removed all S. aureus at 15 s compared with control (no PAA treatment). However, L. monocytogenes biofilm was not affected by any PAA treatment. On the stainless steel surface, epifluorescence microscopy using LIVE/DEAD staining (BacLight, Molecular Probes/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Eugene, OR) showed that all strains were damaged within 15 s, with almost 100% of cells inactivated after 30 s. Results of this trial indicate that, although PAA was able to inactivate both S. aureus and L. monocytogenes monospecies biofilms on stainless steel, it was only able to remove adherent cells of S. aureus from polystyrene microplates. The correct use of PAA is critical for eliminating biofilms formed by S. aureus strains found in dairy plants, although further studies are necessary to determine the optimal PAA treatment for removing biofilms of L. monocytogenes.