Yuanyao Li

Dr. Yuanyao Li


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 November 2020 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HongWei JiangHongWei Jiang
HongWei Jiang
YLYuanyao Li
Yuanyao Li
CZChao Zhou
Chao Zhou
HHHaoyuan Hong
Haoyuan Hong
TGThomas Glade
Thomas Glade
KYKunlong Yin
Kunlong Yin
Displacement predictions are essential to landslide early warning systems establishment. Most existing prediction methods are focused on finding an individual model that provides a better result. However, the limitation of generalization that is inherent in all models makes it difficult for an individual model to predict different cases accurately. In this study, a novel coupled method was proposed, combining the long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks and support vector regression (SVR) algorithm with optimal weight. The Shengjibao landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir area was taken as a case study. At first, the moving average method was used to decompose the cumulative displacement into two components: trend and periodic terms. Single-factor models based on LSTM neural networks and SVR algorithms were used to predict the trend terms of displacement, respectively. Multi-factors LSTM and SVR models were used to predict the periodic terms of displacement. Precipitation, reservoir water level, and previous displacement are considered as the candidate factors for inputs in the models. Additionally, ensemble models based on the SVR algorithm are used to predict the optimal weight to combine the results of the LSTM and SVR models. The results show that the LSTM models display better performance than SVR models; the ensemble model with optimal weight outperforms other models. The prediction accuracy can be further improved by also considering results from multiple models.

6 November 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YSyifan Sheng
yifan Sheng
GXguangli xu
guangli xu
BJBijing Jin
Bijing Jin
CZChao Zhou
Chao Zhou
YLYuanyao Li
Yuanyao Li
Weitao ChenWeitao Chen
Weitao Chen
Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is significant for landslide risk assessment. However, there remains no consensus on which method is optimal for LSM. This study implements a dynamic approach to landslide hazard mapping by integrating spatio-temporal probability analysis with time-varying ground deformation velocity derived from the MT-InSAR (Multi-Temporal InSAR) method. Reliable landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) can inform landslide risk managers and government officials. First, sixteen factors were selected to construct a causal factor system for LSM. Next, Pearson correlation analysis, multicollinearity analysis, information gain ratio, and GeoDetector methods were applied to remove the least important factors of STI, plan curvature, TRI, and slope length. Subsequently, information quantity (IQ), logistic regression (LR), frequency ratio (FR), artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and convolutional neural network (CNN) methods were performed to construct the LSM. The results showed that the distance to a river, slope angle, distance from structure, and engineering geological rock group were the main factors controlling landslide development. A comprehensive set of statistical indicators was employed to evaluate these methods’ effectiveness; sensitivity, F1-measure, and AUC (area under the curve) were calculated and subsequently compared to assess the performance of the methods. Machine learning methods’ training and prediction accuracy were higher than those of statistical methods. The AUC values of the IQ, FR, LR, BP-ANN, RBF-ANN, RF, SVM, and CNN methods were 0.810, 0.854, 0.828, 0.895, 0.916, 0.932, 0.948, and 0.957, respectively. Although the performance order varied for other statistical indicators, overall, the CNN method was the best, while the BP-ANN and RBF-ANN method was the worst among the five examined machine methods. Hence, adopting the CNN approach in this study can enhance LSM accuracy, catering to the needs of planners and government agencies responsible for managing landslide-prone areas and preventing landslide-induced disasters.

23 March 2020
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
WLWei Lin
Wei Lin
KYKunlong Yin
Kunlong Yin
YLYuanyao Li
Yuanyao Li
Ye LiYe Li
Ye Li
In general the determination of landslide rainfall threshold is mainly based on the empirical statistics of historical landslide disaster and rainfall. However, which often results in unsound prediction accuracy of regional rainfall-type landslide due to neglecting the difference effect of rainfall on diverse types of landslide disaster. In order to obtain accurate critical threshold of rainfall inducing landslides, based on the influence of rainfall on landslide mechanism and hydrological, in this paper a precise geological model is established and the soil water, ground water level and slope position shift of the landslides are monitored in real-time. By coupling the simulation results with the relationship between rainfall process and slope deformation, the regulation of slope failure induced by rainfall is discussed. The results indicate that a cumulative rainfall of 150 mm can make the landslide fully saturated, and generate the overall landslide instability along the soil-rock interface. Moreover, when the cumulative rainfall reaches 90 millimeter and lasts for more than 3 days, the displacement of bedding rock landslide exceeds 10 cm. This may because of the deterioration of the mechanical properties and the increase of the pore water pressure caused by the rainfall infiltration. The prediction criteria for landslide instability established from mechanism analysis can provide a theoretical basis for accurate prediction of rain-sensitive landslides.