Background: The abuse of antibiotics during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic might have disrupted efforts to curb the further development and spread of the antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus infection and Staphylococcus spp. coagulase-negative (CoNS) agents of nosocomial bloodstream infections (NBSIs). The purpose of our work was to study the resistance patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and CoNS through the analysis of blood cultures in hospitalized SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative patients (pts.). Materials and methods: During the period January 2018–June 2021, a retrospective case–control study was performed on blood cultures positive for Staphylococcus spp. detected in 177 adult pts. (≥18 years old) hospitalized for >48 hours at Sant’Elia Hospital, Caltanissetta. Results: Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in 33.9% of blood culture samples, and among CoNS, the most frequent strains were Staphylococcus capitis (18.6%) and Staphylococcus hominis (18.1%). Patients aged ≥ 65 years, with a greater number of males, comprised the SARS-CoV-2-negative pts. (71.8% vs. 52.2%, p = 0.0154). Among the SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, the significant resistance of Staphylococcus aureus was only observed for erythromycin (57.1%). The oxacillin resistance of Staphylococcus capitis was higher in SARS-CoV-2-positive than in negative pts. (90% and 78.3%, respectively). Comparing the two groups, we found an increase in resistance in SARS-CoV-2-negative patients for the following antibiotics: gentamicin for Staphylococcus aureus (p = 0.007), clindamycin and erythromycin (p = 0.012) for Staphylococcus hominis and oxacillin and rifampicin for Staphylococcus haemoliticus (p = 0.012). Conclusions: Our study confirms the relevance of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in being responsible for bloodstream infection and draws attention to highly oxacillin-resistant CoNS such as Staphylococcus capitis. The presence of resistant strains of CoNS in hospitals can be worrying, as it limits treatment options and worsens outcomes. The Infection Control Committee (ICC) recommends new treatment strategies to decrease colonization and infections. As part of the implementation of a bloodstream infection prevention program, the authors encourage the introduction of a report on the antimicrobial resistance of hospital bacteremia due to CoNS.

Background: With SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests on the market, healthcare providers must be confident that they can use the results to provide actionable information to understand the characteristics and dynamics of the humoral response and antibodies (abs) in SARS-CoV-2-vaccinated patients. In this way, the study of the antibody responses of healthcare workers (HCWs), a population that is immunocompetent, adherent to vaccination, and continuously exposed to different virus variants, can help us understand immune protection and determine vaccine design goals. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated antibody responses via multiplex assays in a sample of 538 asymptomatic HCWs with a documented complete vaccination cycle of 3 doses of mRNA vaccination and no previous history of infection. Our sample was composed of 49.44% males and 50.56% females, with an age ranging from 21 to 71 years, and a mean age of 46.73 years. All of the HCWs’ sera were collected from April to July 2022 at the Sant’Elia Hospital of Caltanissetta to investigate the immunologic responses against anti-RBD, anti-S1, anti-S2, and anti-N IgG abs. Results: A significant difference in age between HCWs who were positive and negative for anti-N IgG was observed. For anti-S2 IgG, a significant difference between HCWs who were negative and positive compared to anti-N IgG was observed only for positive HCWs, with values including 10 (U/mL)–100 (U/mL); meanwhile, for anti-RBD IgG and anti-S1 IgG levels, there was only a significant difference observed for positive HCWs with diluted titers. For the negative values of anti-N IgG, among the titer dilution levels of anti-RBD, anti-S1, and anti-S2 IgG, the anti-S2 IgG levels were significantly lower than the anti-RBD and anti-S1 levels; in addition, the anti-S1 IgG levels were significantly lower than the anti-RBD IgG levels. For the anti-N IgG positive levels, only the anti-S2 IgG levels were significantly lower than the anti-RBD IgG and anti-S1 IgG levels. Finally, a logistic regression analysis showed that age and anti-S2 IgG were negative and positive predictors of anti-N IgG levels, respectively. The analysis between the vaccine type and mixed mRNA combination showed higher levels of antibodies in mixed vaccinated HCWs. This finding disappeared in the anti-N positive group. Conclusions: Most anti-N positive HCWs showed antibodies against the S2 domain and were young subjects. Therefore, the authors suggest that including the anti-SARS-CoV-2-S2 in antibody profiles can serve as a complementary testing approach to qRT-PCR for the early identification of asymptomatic infections in order to reduce the impact of potential new SARS-CoV-2 variants. Our serological investigation on the type of mRNA vaccine and mixed mRNA vaccines shows that future investigations on the serological responses in vaccinated asymptomatic patients exposed to previous infection or reinfection are warranted for updated vaccine boosters.

Background: Lung infections represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and are predominantly associated with chronic infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The clinical management of CF lung disease is increasingly compromised by the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains, biofilm formation, and the expression of multiple virulence determinants. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), evolutionarily conserved effectors of innate immunity, have emerged as promising therapeutic candidates due to their ability to exert both bactericidal and anti-virulence activities. In this study, we investigated the antimicrobial and mechanistic effects of Ranalexin-1G, an AMP derived from the skin secretion of Rana grylio, against P. aeruginosa, for which its antibacterial activity has not previously been reported in the literature. Methods: Antibacterial activity was determined against the reference strain and three clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa by broth microdilution assays, time-kill kinetics and anti-biofilm assays, while peptide-mediated modulation of virulence was evaluated through transcriptional analysis of key virulence-associated genes by RT-PCR. The impact of Ranalexin-1G on host–pathogen interactions was further assessed using bacterial invasion assays in human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B). Results: Ranalexin-1G exerted a rapid bactericidal effect within 6 h at non-cytotoxic concentrations and displayed modest anti-biofilm effects, with greater efficacy in inhibiting biofilm formation. Mechanistically, peptide treatment resulted in a reduction in the expression of selected genes involved in biofilm formation and virulence, including those associated with alginate biosynthesis and type III secretion system-mediated cytotoxicity. Consistently, Ranalexin-1G markedly impaired bacterial invasion of epithelial cells, indicating interference with early host–pathogen interaction processes. Notably, the peptide displayed robust antimicrobial activity against multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from CF patients. Conclusions: Collectively, these findings suggest that Ranalexin-1G acts through a dual mechanism involving direct bactericidal activity and modulation of selected virulence pathways, supporting further investigation of its potential as an anti-virulence and host-directed approach for the treatment of chronic P. aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis.