PSMA expression gradually increases from benign prostatic hyperplasia to adenocarcinoma of the prostate and is therefore used for the development of improved diagnostic (PSMA)-based prostate cancer imaging tools. Pharmacological induction of PSMA is therefore eminent to further improve the detection rate of PSMA-based imaging. Our previous studies have demonstrated that lovastatin (Lova) and dutasteride (Duta) are able to induce PSMA expression. However, the mechanisms by which PSMA is regulated in prostate cancer remain poorly understood. Androgen receptor (AR) and homeobox B13 (HOXB13) are the best known regulators of PSMA, hence in the present study we aimed to explore the PSMA regulation by HOXB13 and AR signaling in LNCaP and VCaP cells following treatments with Lova and Duta. Furthermore, our previous research revealed a growth arrest in prostate cancer cells after Lova, but not after Duta treatment. To understand this discrepancy, we explored the influence of Lova and Duta on well known tumor growth promoters, such as AR, the mTOR/Akt signaling pathways and Cyclin D1. Our results showed that treatment with Lova leads to a significant inhibition of the investigated tumor promoters and results in growth regression of LNCaP and VCaP cells. In contrast, Duta does not show these effects. Furthermore, we confirm the cooperative effect of HOXB13 and AR in regulating PSMA in LNCaP cells, and extend the investigations to an additional prostate cancer cell line (VCaP).

Purpose: Artifacts from poor ureteroscopes’ light design with shadowing and dark areas in the field of view have been reported. The aim was to quantify effects of light obstruction in a kidney calyx model. Methods: We evaluated a series of contemporary flexible ureteroscopes including the Storz Flex-Xc and Flex-X2s, Olympus V3 and P7, Pusen 7.5F and 9.2F, as well as OTU Wiscope using an enclosed 3D-printed pink in vitro kidney calyx model submerged in saline, where the field of light was intentionally partially obstructed alternatively at 12, 3, 6, and 9 o’clock. A color spectrometer was used for illuminance measurements at a 45° opening position in the background of the model. Results: Overall and mean background illuminance for each obstructive situation were significantly different between scopes for both 50% and 100% brightness settings (ANOVA p < 0.001). At 50% brightness setting, almost all scopes had their highest and lowest background illuminance with the 6 o’clock and 3 o’clock obstructive situation, respectively. At 100% brightness setting, these became 6 o’clock and 12 o’clock obstructive situations. Considering each obstructive situation individually, the Flex-Xc was consistently the scope with highest background illuminance and the Pusen 7.5F the lowest. Background illuminance for each obstructive situation varied significantly for each scope individually, with the greatest range of variability for Pusen 7.5F and V3. Conclusions: Illuminance performance of ureteroscopes within an obstructed calyx model differ significantly for various obstructive situations. Urologists should be aware of this to help guide their choice of ureteroscope.