Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C) is a new entity that emerges 2–4 weeks after the SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. MIS-C can affect all systems, the most severe of which is cardiac involvement. The duration of the cardiac symptoms is still uncertain and may be persistent or prolonged. The American College of Rheumatology Clinical Guidelines recommends cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 2–6 months after the diagnosis of MIS-C in patients presenting with significant transient left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in the acute phase of illness (LV ejection fraction 50%) or persistent LV dysfunction. There are a few studies investigating cardiac MRI findings in MIS-C patients. In this study, we aimed to evaluate cardiac MRI findings, at the earliest 3 months after diagnosis, and compare these findings with the echocardiograms in children with MIS-C. A retrospective study including 34 MIS-C patients was conducted at a tertiary-level University Hospital between June 2020 and July 2021. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria were used in the diagnosis of MIS-C. Cardiac MRI was performed at least 3 months after MIS-C diagnosis. The study included 17 (50%) boys and 17 (50%) girls with a mean age of 9.31 ± 4.72 years. Initial echocardiographic evaluation revealed cardiac abnormality in 13 (38.2) patients; 4 (11.8%) pericardial effusion, 4 (11.8%) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 55%, and 5 (14.7%) coronary artery dilatation. Echocardiography showed normal LV systolic function in all patients during follow-up; coronary dilatation persisted in 2 of 5 (40%) patients at the 6th-month visit. Cardiac MRI was performed in 31 (91.2%) patients, and myocardial hyperemia was not detected in any patients (T1 relaxation time was < 1044 ms in all children). However, 9 (29%) patients’ MRI showed isolated elevated T2 levels, and 19 (61.3%) revealed at least one of the following findings: pericardial effusion, right ventricular dysfunction, or LVEF abnormality. In patients with MIS-C, a high rate of cardiac involvement, particularly pericardial effusion was determined by cardiac MRI performed at the earliest 2–6 months after diagnosis. Even if echocardiography does not reveal any abnormality in the initial phase, cardiac MRI should be suggested in MIS-C patients in the late period. This is the first study reporting cardiac MRI findings in the late period of MIS-C patients.

<%=header_description %> <%=header_description %>

Here, we report magnetic nanoparticle-based biosensor platforms for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses in human serum. The use of the proposed system enabled the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) proteins at a concentration of ng/mL in both buffer and real serum samples. In particular, the protocol, which is considered an indicator of innate immunity after vaccination or post-infection, could be useful for the evaluation of antibody response. We included a total of 48 volunteers who either had COVID-19 but were not vaccinated or who had COVID-19 and were vaccinated with CoronoVac or Biontech. Briefly, in this study, which was planned as a cohort, serum samples were examined 3, 6, and 12 months from the time the volunteers’ showed symptoms of COVID-19 with respect to antibody response in the proposed system. Anti-S Ab and anti-N Ab were detected with a limit of detection of 0.98 and 0.89 ng/mL, respectively. These data were confirmed with the corresponding commercial an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) assays. Compared with ECLIA, more stable data were obtained, especially for samples collected over 6 months. After this period, a drop in the antibody responses was observed. Our findings showed that it could be a useful platform for exploring the dynamics of the immune response, and the proposed system has translational use potential for the clinic. In conclusion, the MNP-based biosensor platform proposed in this study, together with its counterparts in previous studies, is a candidate for determining natural immunity and post-vaccination antibody response, as well as reducing the workload of medical personnel and paving the way for screening studies on vaccine efficacy.

Objective: This study compared the clinical presentations and disease severity between influenza A and B (FLUA and FLUB). Materials and Methods: The study included children hospitalized with virologically confirmed influenza between 2010 and 2020. The severity of the disease was evaluated based on admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), mechanical ventilation requirement, length of hospital stay, length of stay in the PICU, and death. Influenza viruses were compared within predefined age groups (0-2, 3-9, and 10-18 years) and in all age groups. Results: Of 343 patients, FLUA and FLUB were detected in 75.8% and 24.2% of children, respectively. FLUB was associated with a higher incidence of headache and abdominal pain (P < .001 and P = .01). Children with FLUB were prescribed antibiotics and antivirals 0.56 and 0.58- fold fewer than those with FLUA. Headache and abdominal pain rates were higher in patients between 3 and 9 years with FLUB. Children between 0 and 2 years with FLUA were more frequently admitted to the PICU than those with FLUB (23.6% vs. 4.0%; P < .004). Eight patients with FLUA died, while only 1 with FLUB died (P = .69). Conclusion: The clinical presentation of FLUA and FLUB appeared similar, except for headache and abdominal pain, which were more prevalent in older patients with FLUB. Our study revealed that children between 0 and 2 years with FLUA were at a significantly higher risk for admission to the PICU. As a result, greater attention and awareness should be paid to children under 2 years old with FLUA. Cite this article as: Eşki A, Kartal Öztürk G, Çiçek C, Gülen F, Demir E. Comparison of clinical presentations and disease severity of children hospitalized with influenza A and B. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2024;59(4):397-403.

Aim: The objective of this study was to explore the potential correlation between COVID-19 infection or vaccination and levels of anti-nucleocapsid (anti-N) and anti-spike (anti-S) antibodies. Methods: Among 6050 healthcare workers at the Ege University Hospital, a cohort study with 162 participants divided into three arms with 54 participants each was conducted. The three groups were selected as follows: those diagnosed with COVID-19 and not vaccinated (group 1), those diagnosed with COVID-19 and subsequently vaccinated with CoronaVac (group 2), and those not diagnosed with COVID-19 but vaccinated with two doses of CoronaVac (group 3). Antibody levels measured at the sixth month of follow-up were defined as the primary outcome. Results: At the sixth month, all serum samples tested positive for anti-S. Anti-S levels were found to be significantly higher in group 2 than in the other groups (p < 0.001). There were no differences in antibody levels between groups 1 and 3 (p = 0.080). Average antibody levels were found to be lower in office workers and males. Anti-N antibodies were found to be positive in 85.1% of subjects at the sixth month. In group 2, anti-N antibodies were detected in all samples at the sixth month. Anti-N antibody levels were not significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.165). Groups 1 and 2 had significantly higher antibody levels than group 3 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Vaccination or infection provide protection for at least 6 months. Those who have previously been diagnosed with COVID-19 do not need to be vaccinated in the early period before their antibody levels decrease.