Background: Ingestible capsule (IC) systems can assess gastrointestinal (GI) transit times as a surrogate for gut motility for extended periods of time within a minimally invasive, radiation-free and ambulatory setting. Methods: A literature review of IC systems and a systematic review of studies utilizing IC systems to measure GI transit times in healthy volunteers was performed. Screening for eligible studies, data extraction and bias assessments was performed by two reviewers. A narrative synthesis of the results was performed. Results: The literature review identified 23 different IC systems. The systematic review found 6892 records, of which 22 studies were eligible. GI transit time data were available from a total of 1885 healthy volunteers. Overall, seventeen included studies reported gastric emptying time (GET) and small intestinal transit time (SITT). Colonic transit time (CTT) was reported in nine studies and whole gut transit time (WGTT) was reported in eleven studies. GI transit times in the included studies ranged between 0.4 and 15.3 h for GET, 3.3–7 h for SITT, 15.9–28.9 h for CTT and 23.0–37.4 h for WGTT. GI transit times, notably GET, were influenced by the study protocol. Conclusions: This review provides an up-to-date overview of IC systems and reference ranges for GI transit times. It also highlights the need to standardise protocols to differentiate between normal and pathological function.

Background: The Motilis 3D‐Transit system allows ambulatory description of transit patterns throughout the gastrointestinal tract and offers an alternative method for studying gastric motility. We aimed to establish normative values for gastric motility assessed with the method.Method: A total of 132 healthy volunteers ingested the 3D‐Transit capsule for assessment of gastrointestinal transit times. Recordings from 125 subjects were used for definition of normative values. Forty‐six subjects were studied on two consecutive days. Recordings were reanalyzed using newly developed software providing information on gastric emptying (GE) as well as contraction frequency and movement during gastric contractions.Results: The median GE time was 2.7 hours (range 0.1‐21.2). In 89% of subjects, the capsule passed the pylorus within a postingestion period of 6 hours. The median frequency of gastric contractions was 3.1 per minute (range 2.6‐3.8). The frequency was higher in women (3.2, range 2.7‐3.8) than in men (3.0, range 2.6‐3.5) and increased with age (0.004 per year) (P < .05). The median amplitudes were 35° (range 4‐85) when based on rotation of the capsule and 11 mm (range 6‐31) when based on capsule change in position. The rotation amplitude was higher in women and decreased with increasing BMI (P < .05). The position amplitude was also higher in women and increased with the amount of calories in the test meal, but decreased with increasing BMI and age (P < .05). Day‐to‐day variation (P > .05) was considerable while inter‐rater variability was small.Conclusion and Inferences: We have established normative values for gastric motility assessed with the 3D‐Transit system.

Background/Objectives: Chronic nausea and vomiting (N/V) disorders are common in clinical practice. Our primary aim was to compare total and segmental gastrointestinal transit times as well as gastric contraction patterns in patients with chronic N/V syndrome to those of healthy volunteers (HVs). In the patient group, our secondary aim was to explore how symptoms and motility patterns were affected by a serotonin HT₄ receptor agonist (Prucalopride). Methods: Patients with chronic N/V syndrome and HVs underwent baseline assessment of regional gastrointestinal (GI) motility/transit using the Motilis 3D-Transit system. Patients were then treated with Prucalopride 2 mg daily for 28 days, with the 3D-transit examination repeated within 10–20 days after treatment onset. Two self-administered questionnaires (the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale [GSRS] and Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index [GCSI]) were used to assess patients’ symptoms. Results: A total of 19 patients (13 F; median age 25 years (IQR 22–39) and 55 HVs (25 F; median age 28 (24–35) were included. At baseline, no differences in regional GI transit times were found between groups. However, patients had a significantly lower gastric contraction amplitude than HVs (9 mmHg (IQR 8–11) vs. 12 (10–15: p < 0.001). In response to Prucalopride treatment, gastric emptying time was reduced from a median of 3.1 h to 1.6 h (p < 0.005). Further, the GCSI was significantly reduced from GCSI 3.0 (IQR 2.3–3.7) at baseline to GCSI 1.9 (IQR 1.3–3.2) with Prucalopride. Conclusions: Patients with chronic N/V syndrome have significantly lower gastric contraction amplitude than HVs and may symptomatically benefit from prokinetics. They do not, however, have evidence of panenteric dysmotility.